Advertisement

Rectal Prolapse

  • Brooke GurlandEmail author
  • Massarat Zutshi
Chapter

Abstract

Rectal prolapse is a debilitating condition with both functional and anatomic sequelae. There are a myriad of surgical options to repair rectal prolapse with low quality evidence directing the best approach. Surgeons treating rectal prolapse should be familiar with both abdominal and perineal surgery for both primary and secondary prolapse procedures and individualize the treatments. There is a trend towards more durable abdominal procedures for elderly and infirm patients. Multidisciplinary evaluation and surgical repair can be performed safely in patients with both vaginal and rectal prolapse.

Keywords

Rectal prolapse Perineal surgery Rectopexy Elderly Laparoscopic surgery Robotic surgery 

Supplementary material

Video 60.1

Delorme procedure (WMV 207357 kb)

Video 60.2

Perineal rectosigmoidectomy (Altemeier procedure) (WMV 228700 kb)

Video 60.3

Rectopexy for rectal prolapse (WMV 106278 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Peters 3rd WA, Smith MR, Drescher CW. Rectal prolapse in women with other defects of pelvic floor support. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(7):1488–94. discussion 1494–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kairaluoma MV, Kellokumpu IH. Epidemiologic aspects of complete rectal prolapse. Scand J Surg. 2005;94(3):207–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marceau C, Parc Y, Debroux E, Tiret E, Parc R. Complete rectal prolapse in young patients: psychiatric disease a risk factor of poor outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7(4):360–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mitchell N, Norris ML. Rectal prolapse associated with anorexia nervosa: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Eat Disord. 2013;1:39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim DS, Tsang CB, Wong WD, Lowry AC, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD. Complete rectal prolapse: evolution of management and results. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42(4):460–6. discussion 466–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glasgow SC, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW, Dietz DW. Preoperative anal manometry predicts continence after perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(7):1052–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Snooks SJ, Henry MM, Swash M. Anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse: differential assessment of the innervation to puborectalis and external anal sphincter muscles. Gut. 1985;26(5):470–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Madoff RD, Mellgren A. One hundred years of rectal prolapse surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42(4):441–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Varma M, Rafferty J, Buie WD, Standards Practice Task Force of American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the management of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(11):1339–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pescatori M, Spyrou M, Pulvirenti d’Urso A. A prospective evaluation of occult disorders in obstructed defecation using the ‘iceberg diagram’. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(5):452–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Renzi A, Izzo D, Di Sarno G, De Iuri A, Bucci L, Izzo G, et al. Cinedefecographic findings in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome. A study in 420 cases. Minerva Chir. 2006;61(6):493–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Myers JO, Rothenberger DA. Sugar in the reduction of incarcerated prolapsed bowel. Report of two cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34(5):416–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hamalainen KJ, Raivio P, Antila S, Palmu A, Mecklin JP. Biofeedback therapy in rectal prolapse patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(3):262–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gourgiotis S, Baratsis S. Rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22(3):231–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deen KI, Grant E, Billingham C, Keighley MR. Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair versus perineal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 1994;81(2):302–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Senapati A, Gray RG, Middleton LJ, Harding J, Hills RK, Armitage NC, et al. PROSPER: a randomised comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(7):858–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuijpers HC. Treatment of complete rectal prolapse: to narrow, to wrap, to suspend, to fix, to encircle, to plicate or to resect? World J Surg. 1992;16(5):826–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lieberth M, Kondylis LA, Reilly JC, Kondylis PD. The Delorme repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a retrospective review. Am J Surg. 2009;197(3):418–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tsunoda A, Yasuda N, Yokoyama N, Kamiyama G, Kusano M. Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse: clinical and physiological analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(9):1260–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liberman H, Hughes C, Dippolito A. Evaluation and outcome of the Delorme procedure in the treatment of rectal outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(2):188–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chun SW, Pikarsky AJ, You SY, Gervaz P, Efron J, Weiss E, et al. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for rectal prolapse: role of levatorplasty. Tech Coloproctol. 2004;8(1):3–8. discussion 8–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Altomare DF, Binda G, Ganio E, De Nardi P, Giamundo P, Pescatori M, et al. Long-term outcome of Altemeier’s procedure for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(4):698–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Graf W, Karlbom U, Pahlman L, Nilsson S, Ejerblad S. Functional results after abdominal suture rectopexy for rectal prolapse or intussusception. Eur J Surg. 1996;162(11):905–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khanna AK, Misra MK, Kumar K. Simplified sutured sacral rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Eur J Surg. 1996;162(2):143–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Novell JR, Osborne MJ, Winslet MC, Lewis AA. Prospective randomized trial of Ivalon sponge versus sutured rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 1994;81(6):904–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bachoo P, Brazzelli M, Grant A. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2)(2):CD001758.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aitola PT, Hiltunen KM, Matikainen MJ. Functional results of operative treatment of rectal prolapse over an 11-year period: emphasis on transabdominal approach. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42(5):655–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Frykman HM, Goldberg SM. The surgical treatment of rectal procidentia. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1969;129(6):1225–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sayfan J, Pinho M, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MR. Sutured posterior abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy compared with Marlex rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 1990;77(2):143–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Luukkonen P, Mikkonen U, Jarvinen H. Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992;7(4):219–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tou S, Brown SR, Malik AI, Nelson RL. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(4)(4):CD001758.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hsu A, Brand MI, Saclarides TJ. Laparoscopic rectopexy without resection: a worthwhile treatment for rectal prolapse in patients without prior constipation. Am Surg. 2007;73(9):858–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    El Muhtaseb MS, Bartolo DC, Zayiae D, Salem T. Colonic transit before and after resection rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18(3):273–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Formijne Jonkers HA, Draaisma WA, Wexner SD, Broeders IA, Bemelman WA, Lindsey I, et al. Evaluation and surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: an international survey. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(1):115–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gurland B. Ventral mesh rectopexy: is this the new standard for surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse? Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(12):1446–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ripstein CB, Lanter B. Etiology and surgical therapy of massive prolapse of the rectum. Ann Surg. 1963;157:259–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Winde G, Reers B, Nottberg H, Berns T, Meyer J, Bunte H. Clinical and functional results of abdominal rectopexy with absorbable mesh-graft for treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Eur J Surg. 1993;159(5):301–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tjandra JJ, Fazio VW, Church JM, Milsom JW, Oakley JR, Lavery IC. Ripstein procedure is an effective treatment for rectal prolapse without constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(5):501–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    McMahan JD, Ripstein CB. Rectal prolapse. An update on the rectal sling procedure. Am Surg. 1987;53(1):37–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Roberts PL, Schoetz Jr DJ, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Ripstein procedure. Lahey Clinic experience: 1963–1985. Arch Surg. 1988;123(5):554–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 2004;91(11):1500–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Samaranayake CB, Luo C, Plank AW, Merrie AE, Plank LD, Bissett IP. Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(6):504–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mackenzie H, Dixon AR. Proficiency gain curve and predictors of outcome for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy. Surgery. 2014;156(1):158–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    van Geluwe B, Wolthuis A, Penninckx F, D’Hoore A. Lessons learned after more than 400 laparoscopic ventral rectopexies. Acta Chir Belg. 2013;113(2):103–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Badrek-Al Amoudi AH, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR. How to deal with complications after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: lessons learnt from a tertiary referral centre. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(6):707–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rajamaheswari N, Agarwal S, Seethalakshmi K. Lumbosacral spondylodiscitis: an unusual complication of abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(3):375–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Draaisma WA, van Eijck MM, Vos J, Consten EC. Lumbar discitis after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(2):255–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Formijne Jonkers HA, Maya A, Draaisma WA, Bemelman WA, Broeders IA, Consten EC, et al. Laparoscopic resection rectopexy versus laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18(7):641–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Panis Y. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: resection or no resection? That is the question…. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18(7):611–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mehmood RK, Parker J, Bhuvimanian L, Qasem E, Mohammed AA, Zeeshan M, et al. Short-term outcome of laparoscopic versus robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Is robotic superior? Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29(9):1113–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rondelli F, Bugiantella W, Villa F, Sanguinetti A, Boni M, Mariani E, et al. Robot-assisted or conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2014;12 Suppl 2:S153–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Heemskerk J, de Hoog DE, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND. Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(11):1825–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Fang SH, Cromwell JW, Wilkins KB, Eisenstat TE, Notaro JR, Alva S, et al. Is the abdominal repair of rectal prolapse safer than perineal repair in the highest risk patients? An NSQIP analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(11):1167–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Magruder JT, Efron JE, Wick EC, Gearhart SL. Laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse to reduce surgical-site infections and length of stay. World J Surg. 2013;37(5):1110–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wijffels N, Cunningham C, Dixon A, Greenslade G, Lindsey I. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse is safe and effective in the elderly. Does this make perineal procedures obsolete? Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(5):561–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Germain A, Perrenot C, Scherrer ML, Ayav C, Brunaud L, Ayav A, et al. Long-term outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse in elderly patients. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16(3):198–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hotouras A, Ribas Y, Zakeri S, Bhan C, Wexner SD, Chan CL, et al. A systematic review of the literature on the surgical management of recurrent rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis. 2015. doi: 10.1111/codi.12946.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Steele SR, Goetz LH, Minami S, Madoff RD, Mellgren AF, Parker SC. Management of recurrent rectal prolapse: surgical approach influences outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(4):440–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hool GR, Hull TL, Fazio VW. Surgical treatment of recurrent complete rectal prolapse: a thirty-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40(3):270–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ding JH, Canedo J, Lee SH, Kalaskar SN, Rosen L, Wexner SD. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for primary and recurrent rectal prolapse: are the results comparable the second time? Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(6):666–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jackson SL, Weber AM, Hull TL, Mitchinson AR, Walters MD. Fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(3):423–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Riansuwan W, Hull TL, Bast J, Hammel JP. Combined surgery in pelvic organ prolapse is safe and effective. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(3):188–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Watadani Y, Vogler SA, Warshaw JS, Sueda T, Lowry AC, Madoff RD, et al. Sacrocolpopexy with rectopexy for pelvic floor prolapse improves bowel function and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(12):1415–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ayav A, Bresler L, Brunaud L, Zarnegar R, Boissel P. Surgical management of combined rectal and genital prolapse in young patients: transabdominal approach. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005;20(2):173–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    VanderPas Lamb S, Massengill J, Sheridan MJ, Stern LE, von Pechmann W. Safety of combined abdominal sacral colpopexy and sigmoid resection with suture rectopexy: a retrospective cohort study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(1):18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ortega AE, Klipfel N, Kelso R, Petrone P, Roman I, et al. Changing concepts in the pathogenesis, evaluation, and management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Am Surg. 2008;74(10):967–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Lee TH, Hong SJ, Lee JS. Thickened internal anal sphincter has been reported to be a typical finding in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;21(1):140–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Rao SS, Benninga MA, Bharucha AE, Chiarioni G, Di Lorenzo C, et al. ANMS-ESNM position paper and consensus guidelines on biofeedback therapy for anorectal disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(5):594–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Vaizey CJ, van den Bogaerde JB, Emmanuel AV, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, et al. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Br J Surg. 1998;85(12):1617–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Waniczek D, Rdes J, Rudzki MK, Piecuch J, Rubicz N, et al. Effective treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome using argon plasma coagulation. Prz Gastroenterol. 2014;9(4):249–53.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Evans C, Ong E, Jones OM, Cunningham C, Lindsey I. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is effective for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome when associated with rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16(3):O112–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Badrek-Amoudi AH, Roe T, Mabey K, Carter H, Mills A, et al. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a cause for optimism? Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(5):575–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Beck DE. Surgical therapy for colitis cystica profunda and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2002;5(3):231–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASCRS (American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons) 2016

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Colorectal SurgeryCleveland Clinic, Lerner College of MedicineClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations