Types of Recombinant Vaccines
- 1.3k Downloads
The original scientific strategy behind vaccinology has historically been to “isolate, inactivate, and inject,” first invoked by Louis Pasteur.
KeywordsLactic Acid Bacterium West Nile Virus Rheumatic Heart Disease Varroa Destructor Varroa Mite
9.1 Live and Non-live Vaccines
The original scientific strategy behind vaccinology has historically been to “isolate, inactivate, and inject,” first invoked by Louis Pasteur.
The recombinant DNA and nanotechnology did much enlarge the repertoire on vaccines, which is today based on three adjusted principles, attenuation, inactivation, and recombination, as shown in Fig. 9.1. The three principles are regarded as equal, and all experimental possibilities for a new vaccine development against a pathogen should be studied in detail. The recombinant DNA and nanotechnology did not change the basic scientific strategy: live and non-live vaccines. Live vaccines are non-adjuvanted, and non-live vaccines are generally adjuvanted.
New developments against tuberculosis (TB) highlight this broad experimental approach:
Today, it estimated that about one-third of the world population is infected with the TB bacillus. Approximately 54 million people are infected every year, 9.4 million develop the disease, and 1.7 million die from this curable disease. The TB bacillus kills more people than any other infectious agent alone.
1921 and BCG.
Currently, BCG (Bacillus Calmette–Guérin) is the only vaccine recommended by the WHO, with more than three billion doses administered since its introduction in 1921. BCG is prepared from a strain of the attenuated live bovine tuberculosis bacillus, Mycobacterium bovis, which lost its virulence in humans by being specially subcultured in an artificial medium. However, although it protects newborns and children from severe forms of TB, its efficacy against pulmonary TB in adolescents and adults is far from optimal, with protection rates varying between 0 and 80 % according to the geographical area.
9.2 Efficacy and Safety Aspects
The various types of vaccines differ in eliciting an immune response. Live attenuated vaccines (LAVs) mimic a natural infection without being virulent and trigger the activation of the innate immune system through PAMPs. Following injections, LAVs rapidly disseminate throughout the vascular network to the draining lymph nodes. Therefore, the route of application of LAVs does not specifically influence the immune response. LAVs also don’t need an adjuvant; they possess a natural intrinsic adjuvancy. Safety concerns exist because of the replication competence and the possibility of recombination with a wild type.
9.3 DNA Vaccines
DNA vaccines entail the direct, in situ inoculation of DNA-based eukaryotic expression vectors that encode the sequence of a pathogenic protein antigen. The constructed plasmids are then subsequently grown in bacteria like E. coli and highly purified via chromatographic methods. LPS contamination of plasmids has to be prevented because of the immunotoxic properties of natural LPS.
After purification the circular double-stranded DNA plasmids are ready for vaccination. The de novo production of the encoded antigens in the host results in the elicitation of both the antibody and the cellular response by activating cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). Vaccine proteins made by the host are natural proteins and contain important posttranslational modifications such as the correct glycosylation. But like subunit vaccines, DNA vaccines must be adjuvanted. Naked DNA does not work.
The unique advantage of DNA vaccines is their ability to mimic the effects of live attenuated vaccines without the risk associated with the administration of infectious albeit attenuated material. DNA vaccines are able to stimulate a complete, humoral and cellular immune response. Peptide fragments are processed via the endogenous pathway, resulting in the presentation of antigen on the cell surface by MHC class I molecules.
Plasmid DNA is very stable also beyond a cold chain. Therefore, the storage, transportation, and distribution of DNA vaccines are more practical and also cheaper .
Strong promoter/enhancer sequence for driving the incorporated foreign gene
Convenient cloning site for insertion of foreign genes
Origin of replication for initiation of plasmid replication
Polyadenylation/termination sequence for production of mature mRNA
Resistance/antibiotic marker for selection
Immunomodulators, e.g., CpGs, interleukins, ubiquitin, etc.
(on the same plasmid or on extra plasmids)
Uptake of Plasmid DNA.
Some biological barriers have to be overcome by DNA vaccines on the way to the cell nucleus where the plasmid DNA is translated into cellular mRNA. After delivery of plasmid DNA to the target tissue, e.g., skeletal muscle or skin, lots of tissue nucleases attack and degrade a large amount of the applicated DNA. Also the extracellular matrix with collagen and hyaluronic acid influences the passage from the application site to the cell membrane.
Only a small portion (1 % estimated) of the still intact plasmid DNA will cross the cell membrane by phagocytosis or pinocytosis. Inside the cell the route toward the nucleus is also spiked with exo- and endonucleases so that probably only 0.1 % (estimated) is successfully and actively transported through the nucleus pore membrane (NPC). Small particles (<~40 kDa) are able to pass through the nuclear pore complex (NPC) by passive diffusion; larger particles need the support of carrier proteins for efficient passage through the complex.
Whereas in human medicine clinical trials with DNA vaccines are still ongoing without any registered product on the market, the first approved DNA vaccines for the veterinarian medicine are available since 2005 and are discussed now.
Approved DNA Vaccines in Veterinary Medicine
The first veterinarian DNA vaccines were developed for horses (Davis B.S., 2001 for WNV ; Giese M., 2002 for EAV ). Today the number of current clinical trials worldwide with veterinary DNA vaccines is unmanageable and probably all species are hit.
9.3.1 Dogs: Canine Malignant Melanoma
Metastases of the tumors will be found very often in distant parts of the body. The overall biology of CMM is similar to the biology of human melanoma. However the melanomas in dogs have diverse biologic behaviors due to the race and a variety of factors. Standardized treatments such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy are the common tools to fight canine malignant melanoma. These traditional tools have afforded minimal to modest stage-dependent clinical benefits.
Xenogeneic DNA Vaccine.
The plasmid DNA contains a cDNA for the human tyrosinase, huTyr, a tumor antigen (TA). This is a non-mutated differentiation antigen and specific to melanoma. Tyrosinase is a glycoprotein and essential in the process of melanin synthesis (Fig. 9.6). Like other TAs tyrosinase is overexpressed in tumor cells and therefore an ideal target in cancer therapy. Normally there is no strong immune reaction against the body’s own protein. But immunization of dogs with xenogeneic huTyr cDNA can break the immune tolerance against this self tumor differentiation antigen and induce antibody and cytotoxic T cell response against melanoma cells . Tyrosinase is highly conserved from dog to mouse to man.
In a recent clinical trial with 58 dogs diagnosed with stage II and III canine oral melanoma, the safety and efficacy of the xenogeneic DNA vaccine was investigated. Dogs received a 4-vaccination treatment series following surgical removal of the primary tumor and radiotherapy in cases with positive surgical margins or positive regional lymph nodes. One dose contains 102 μg DNA given in a volume of 0.4 ml by the transdermal route via a needle-free vaccination device. Booster immunizations were given at 6-month intervals.
The results of the xenogeneic immunization of dogs with huTyr cDNA as an adjunct therapy for CMM demonstrate a significant increase of survival time compared to the control group. None of the dogs developed systemic adverse reactions; no toxicity was seen. The overall safety of this DNA vaccine is confirmed. This vaccine development represents a tremendous milestone in DNA science and technology.
9.3.2 Horses: West Nile Virus, A Severe Zoonotic Infection
West Nile virus (WNV) is a mosquito-borne member of the family Flaviviridae, genus Flavivirus, and was first identified in 1937 in Uganda, Africa. It is a positive-sense, single-strand RNA virus, (+)ssRNA, of about 11 kb that encodes a single polyprotein with seven nonstructural proteins and three structural proteins. The RNA strand is held within a nucleocapsid. WNV replicates in the cytoplasm of infected cells.
WNV is a zoonotic virus. The primary reservoir is birds with a significant impact to spread the infection across countries and continents. More than 170 different species are described as carrier of this virus. WNV is spread from bird to bird by mosquitoes when they bite, or take a blood meal, from birds that are infected with the virus. Birds from some species get ill and die; others have no clinical signs and survive. Mosquitoes are also capable of spreading the virus to horses, dogs, cats, mice, alligators, and lots of other mammals but also to humans.
One-third of all horses bitten by carrier mosquitoes develop the disease and die or are so affected that euthanasia is required. The incubation period ranges from 3 to 14 days. Horses that do become ill vary in symptoms: muscle trembling, skin twitching, ataxia, sleepiness, dullness, and listlessness. WNV may cross the placenta from mother to gestating foal. Horses cannot spread the disease to humans.
WNV produces different outcomes in humans like in horses: fever, headache, chills, diaphoresis, weakness, swollen lymph nodes, drowsiness, and pain in the joints comparable to symptoms of influenza. More severe neuroinvasive infection includes meningitis and encephalitis.
The final expression plasmid for immunization of horses contains the human cytomegalovirus early gene promoter, signal sequences from Japanese virus, and a fusion gene of prM and E. The WNV DNA vaccines induce a stable and long-lasting complete immune response (12 months) and are safe in horses.
This vaccine was approved for veterinary use by USDA in July 2005 and released to public in December 2008.
9.3.3 Fish: Salmon and the First Commercial DNA Vaccine
Part of the fishing industry is aquaculture, also known as aqua farming, but it can be contrasted with commercial fishing, which is the harvesting of wild fish. Aquaculture involves cultivating freshwater and saltwater fish and other populations (shrimp, oyster) under controlled conditions. Salmon is one of the main food-producing fish in the world. A DNA vaccine for fish must be not only safe for the animal but especially safe for the fish consumer.
Salmon is the major economic contributor to the world production of farmed fish, representing over U$1 billion annually in the United States. Salmon farming is also very big in Norway, Scotland, Canada, and Chile and is the source for most salmon consumed in the United States and Europe. Like all other animals also fish is threatened by viruses, bacteria, and parasites. One major problem for salmons is the infectious hematopoietic necrosis (IHN) virus .
Infectious hematopoietic necrosis (IHN) virus is a common viral pathogen of both wild and farmed salmonids, in particular Pacific salmonids, rainbow trout, and Atlantic salmon. IHN virus is enzootic to the Pacific Northwest; however it has varying effects on different Pacific salmonids. It is a negative-sense single-stranded, (−)ssRNA virus that is a member of the Rhabdoviridae family, genus Novirhabdovirus. The RNA genome is 11,133 nucleotides long and contains a leader (L) and trailer (T) sequences at its 3′-end and 5′-end, respectively. The coding regions are N, P, M, G, NV, and L genes. G encodes the surface glycoprotein, so-called spikes, main target for the immune response.
IHNV is transmitted following shedding of the virus in the feces, urine, sexual fluids, and external mucus and by direct contact or close contact with surrounding contaminated water. The virus gains entry into fish at the base of the fins. Salmons are carnivorous and are currently fed a meal produced from catching other wild fish and other marine organisms – a permanent origin of possible infections with IHNV.
Clinical signs of infection with IHNV include anemia, skin darkening, bulging of the eyes, fading of the gills, and abdominal distension. Infected fish commonly hemorrhage in several areas, like the mouth, the pectoral fins, muscles near the anus, and the yolk sac of fry. Diseased fish weaken, eventually floating on the surface of the water. Necrosis is common in the kidney and spleen and sometimes in the liver. Mortality rates in older fish (2–3 kg) tend to range from 10 to 20 %; in smolts the mortality rate often exceeds 85 %. The average cumulative mortality following an outbreak is estimated at 47 %.
The antigen is the viral surface glycoprotein (G) capable of eliciting neutralizing antibody and the production of a protective immune response. The G gene was cloned into a eukaryotic expression vector by insertion of an intermediate-early promoter and a polyadenylation signal. But the speciality of this vaccine is to be prepared as a two-component vaccine in a single vaccine, one plasmid or more.
The second component is a portion of the nucleic acid sequence encoding a second peptide, derived from a fish pathogen other than the said rhabdovirus resulting in a fusion. This second pathogen can be any fish pathogen, e.g., ISAV, IPNV, iridovirus, NNV, SPDV, SVCV, VHSV, koi herpes virus, and more. The rationale behind this is that the presence of the IHNV G protein boosts the immune response to the second protein, resulting in a protective effect against infection by this fish pathogen. The vaccine is given intramuscularly with a dosage of only 10 μg in 50 μl on the left dorsal flank, in the area just below the dorsal fin [7, 8].
This first DNA fish vaccine was licensed in 2005 in Canada by the Veterinary Biologics Section (VBS), Animal Health and Production Division, Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) and is also used now in studies in Norway.
9.3.4 Honey Bees: Varroa Destructor1
There are many environmental stressors and diseases which influence and seriously threat the life of European honey bees, Apis mellifera. The European honey bee is professionally managed worldwide for honey production and pollination. The bee was imported to the United States 400 years ago with the first European settlers and called “white man’s fly” by the native Americans, the Indians.
First reported in the United States, a mysterious so-called colony collapse disorder (CCD) decimated the bee colonies there between 50 and 90 %, first observed during the winters of 1995–1996 and then 2000–2001 and without interruptions up to now. A similar situation is also given in Europe. About 20,000–60,000 bees live in a colony.
The first description originated from the 1950s. In the early nineteenth century, the colony losses were known in England as “Isle of Wight disease,” and the Americans called this phenomenon “disappearing disease” in the 1960s, whereas these colony losses in France in the late 1990s were called “mysterious bee losses.” Where have all the bees gone?
The huge loss of honey bees as pollinators has a dramatic impact on agricultural pollination. About 130 crops, nuts, fruits, and vegetables are pollinated by A. mellifera, with an overall value of more than $ 15 billion in the United States and more than € 14 billion for the EU in 2005. A bee colony produces some 1 kg/2205 lb honey per day. In return, these bees have to pollinate 10–15 million flowers.
One should keep in mind that besides European honey bees, wild insects, among them 30,000 species of wild bees, have also a very great impact on pollination and seem to be more efficient in pollination as managed honey bees . The industrial farming threatens also the natural biotope of wild insect pollinators.
The total global economic value of honey bee pollination was calculated in 2005 to more than € 150 billion or $ 202 billion. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations estimates that there are 65 million managed honey bee colonies worldwide. Beside this professional agriculture, honey bees are irreplaceable for the biodiversity. This organism appeared during evolution with the first flower plants and exists since 100 million years as described in Chap. 2, Fig. 2.10. After swine and cattle, bees are in Europe and North America the third important farm animal and since 2007 formally listed as farm animal in Switzerland. Therefore, CCD is not only an economical but also an essential global ecological problem which urgently must be solved in the future. “The bee is more than honey.”
What Is Causing CCD?
The colony collapse disorder of the last years seems to differ from past outbreaks: The worker bees disappear instead of dying in place, leaving behind the queen and young bees. High levels of bacteria, viruses, and fungi are measured in the gut of the remaining bees. Collapses can occur within 2 days.
A Complex Problem.
Different theories are discussed about what is causing CCD. Pesticide contamination, hotly debated to interfere with the nerve system affecting foraging behavior of bees, lead them to abandon their hives. Fungal diseases such as Nosema spp. is known for big bee losses in Spain. Monocultures or gene-manipulated crops. Electro smoke (radio waves) caused by cell phones destroys the bee’s compass. The rigors of travelling in trucks from crop to crop in the USA. Down from February professional US beekeepers travel with their colonies through the country until December. Thereby the bees must relocate up to 15 times. In Europe the bee colonies begin the winter sleep around September. Also the climate change, the temperature sensitivity is discussed to have an impact on crop pollination. CCD is likely caused by a combination of factors [10, 11].
But in all CCD cases, an overload of bloodsucking varroa mites is detectable and varroa is currently considered the major threat for apiculture. The infection and disease is called varroosis. Varroa destructor is an ectoparasite, has a reddish-brown flat shape, and is 1–1.8 mm long and 1.5–2 mm wide, with eight legs. V. destructor infest worker bees and drones and its brood. The mite develops inside the brood cells. Varroa is a real colossus compared to the size of bees as can be seen in Fig. 9.1. Varroa mites belong to the scientific class of Arachnida, subclass Acari. There are 50,000 species described alone from mites. Some mites prefer carbohydrates as food such as meal or crops. The house dust mites feed flakes of shed human skin. Varroa mites prefer fresh “blood” and the hemolymph of bees and can feed 0.1 mg/0.0000002205 lb within 2 h.
Varroa as Vector.
Varroa may be not considered as isolated agent for the disease. The mortality of adult bees and its brood must be considered in the context with secondary viral infections. At least 18 various viruses are able to infect honey bees, mostly ssRNA viruses. Eight viruses are known to be associated with varroa mites: acute bee paralysis virus (ABPV), black queen cell virus (BQCV), chronic bee paralysis virus (CBPV), deformed wing virus (DWV), Kashmir bee virus (KBV), sacbrood bee virus (SBV), cloudy wing virus (CWV), and slow bee paralysis virus (SBPV) [14, 15, 16, 17].
A number of natural and synthetic chemicals are commercially available for the control of varroa infestations. The first compounds were bromopropylate, fluvalinate, or other pyrethroid insecticides. And to make a long story short, varroa mites became resistant not only against one product of a given chemical class; the resistance was against the entire class with several related synthetic products. Also the use of natural products, such as formic acid, mineral oil, or thymol, is only partially and temporally effective and show adverse effects . There is no successful chemical treatment. Mites will quickly develop resistance to all chemicals.
The Immune System of Insects.
The basic difference between insect and vertebrate immunity is the missing highly specific antigen response of the acquired immune system in insects. Nevertheless, in the 400 million years of evolution, insects developed a powerful defense strategy against bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites. Only protected by this “primitive” immune system insects were so successful that they colonized all terrestrial ecosystems.
The insect innate immunity shows many similarities to the vertebrate and to the human innate immunity, is multifaceted, and involves both humoral and cellular components . Most insights on insect immunity are provided by Drosophila melanogaster research. The key mechanism is also observed in honey bees.
The humoral and systemic response to bacterial and fungal infections is controlled by antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). There are circulating receptors sensing a danger signal and activating the Toll pathway, whereas membrane-bound receptors activate the Imd pathway. Both pathways lead to the translocation of NF-kB-like transcription factors and the production of AMPs. NF-kB response elements can be detected in the promoter region of the diptericin gene.
The cellular immune response is mediated by specialized blood cells, the hemocytes, plasmatocytes, crystal cells, and lamellocytes . Plasmatocytes represent 95 % of the majority of hemocytes. They express phagocytic receptors and patrol through the body, clear microorganism and cell debris, and signal infections to the fat bodies. The bee genome was completely sequenced in 2006 .
The Bee DNA Vaccine.
An expression plasmid was constructed with a CMV promoter. Surprisingly, no bee or other insect specific promoter was essential to drive the expression of the protein. The enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) was chosen as reporter gene and inserted into the multiple cloning site, together with an SV40 enhancer element. The plasmid construct was produced in E. coli and highly purified by standard techniques.
European honey bees (Apis mellifera) were obtained from local beekeepers and cultivated under lab conditions. Varroa mites were collected from infested bees.
The oral vaccination of the EGFP plasmid was operated by feeding the bees with a mixed solution of sugar and plasmid DNA (vaccine sugar). Standard sugar solutions made by the beekeeper are the normal food for winter bees.
Over 10 days after onset of feeding, we measured the expression of EGFP by immunofluorescence and Western blot analysis with EGFP antibodies. Between day 3 and 10, a clear EGFP signal was detected in the thorax and especially in the Malpighian tubules. Control bees fed with DNA lacking the reporter did not show any signal. In parallel, control experiments with transformed E. coli were done to study the possibility of EGFP expression in gut bacteria instead of bee cells. No EGFP signal was detected in transformed bacteria.
We started with the simple idea that the biochemistry in eukaryotic cells remains the same, irrespective of the organism. A difference is given in the configuration of the immune system. That means, an insect can successfully fight against parasites and infections but with different weapons. No T cells, no B cells, and consequently no antibodies and no memory. We are able to stimulate targeted immune genes of bees and measure an insect typical immune response. A standard plasmid DNA vaccine, first developed for horses, bridges the evolution from fish to insects to mammals. No other vaccine type is able to do this job. How fascinating biology is!
9.4 Protein and Carbohydrate (Subunit) Vaccines
A protein subunit is based on a single protein molecule and able to stimulate a humoral immune response, but usually not a cellular response. After phagocytosis proteins are degraded by acid-dependent proteases in endosomes (endosomal or exogenous pathway), resulting in an MHC II presentation of the antigenic peptides. A peptide is one form of a subunit.
Carbohydrates are also used as subunits with a poor and age-dependent immunogenicity. Carbohydrate antigens induce a T cell-independent B cell response as discussed in Chap. 6. Therefore carbohydrates are mainly linked to a protein (conjugation) to enhance toe immune reaction as discussed here with the Hib conjugate vaccine.
The polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) capsule of Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) is a major virulence factor for the organism. PRP is a T cell-independent antigen characterized by, e.g., induction of a poor antibody response in less than 18-month-old infants and children and the inability to induce a booster response. Polysaccharide vaccines based on PRP alone were developed in the 1970s.
HbOC: Diphtheria CRM protein 197, mutant Corynebacterium – linkage: no spacer
HbOMP: Outer membrane protein, OMP, Neisseria meningitidis – linkage: spacer
PRP-D: Diphtheria toxoid, D – linkage: spacer
These Hib conjugate vaccines differ by protein carrier, polysaccharide size, and method of chemical conjugation, including use of a spacer between the PRP and protein carrier.
Subunit vaccines, while offering greater safety, are intrinsically poorly immunogenic and strong adjuvants are essential to boost the activation of immune responses.
9.4.1 Protein Subunit: Shigellosis2
Shigellosis remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality, with about 90 million episodes occurring each year and about 100,000 deaths per year. About 60 % of deaths occur in infants under 5 years of age living in third world countries. Four different species (S. flexneri, S. sonnei, S. boydii, and S. dysenteriae) have been described so far, along with more than 50 O-antigen serotype variations.
Serotype variability is dictated by modifications of the O-antigen portion of LPS. O antigens vary in the number of oligosaccharide unit repeats, the types and distribution of carbohydrates, and the intra- and intermolecular linkages . In S. flexneri, these genes are encoded in the bacterial chromosome. In contrast, S. sonnei, which shows no serotype variability, expresses plasmid-encoded O-antigen modification enzymes. The O antigen is one of the major immunogenic components of Shigella and is a virulence factor, in part, due to masking the exposure of type three secretion apparatus .
The inclusion of conserved proteins in vaccine compounds potentially solves the issue of serotype specificity, thus allowing the generation of a highly desirable pan-Shigella vaccine. In addition, recombinant proteins usually have increased safety profiles.
Another important impact in Shigella epidemiology that prompts vaccine development is the increasing frequency of antibiotic-resistant strains. Antibiotic resistance is continually rising for this pathogen .
Shigella spp. as Causative Agent of Shigellosis.
First defined as a causative agent of bacillary dysentery by Shiga in Japan, Shigella is a gram-negative bacillus that is noncapsulated and nonmotile. Diagnosis is generally based on symptoms  since bloody, mucoid stools are indicative of Shigella infections. However, because several diarrheal infections caused by other microorganisms share these symptoms (enteroinvasive E. coli and Campylobacter, among others), the sole analysis of symptoms is insufficient for an accurate diagnosis. Therefore, clinical diagnosis must be complemented with microbiological isolation from culture.
Shigella Invasion and Pathogenesis.
The genes associated with the T3SS are encoded on a 220-kB plasmid which is highly conserved among the Shigella species. At the heart of the T3SS is the type three secretion apparatus (T3SA) which is composed of a basal body similar to that of flagellar systems and an extracellular needle . Invasion plasmid antigen D (IpaD) is a 37 kDa protein that forms a pentameric ring at the tip of the needle. It controls secretion of effector proteins and is the environmental sensor for mobilization of IpaB to the T3SA tip complex. IpaB is a 64 kDa translocator that forms a ring atop the IpaD ring and is responsible for host cell contact. This contact is required for mobilization of IpaC to the needle tip and formation of a complete unidirectional conduit from the bacterial cytoplasm to the host cell cytoplasm. The initiation of inflammation and invasion processes occurs exclusively at the basolateral side of host cells, highlighting the importance of the previous steps of macrophage subversion in Shigella colonization of the gut.
Mouse lethal pulmonary challenge: Many of the recent vaccine development efforts have been tested in the mouse lethal pulmonary model. In this model, a high dose of virulent Shigella is administered to mice intranasally.
Mouse colonic infection: Another mouse model more recently developed involves the use of streptomycin to clear the intestinal commensal bacteria. After such treatment, Shigella is able to colonize the colon with viable Shigella being isolated from fecal samples for up to 30 days .
Sereny test: The Sereny test model  has long been used to test the invasive capabilities of Shigella. In this model, guinea pigs are inoculated in the eye with Shigella, which induces a keratoconjunctivitis. This model allows examination of Shigella invasion and the protective efficacy of candidate vaccines.
Rabbit cecal ligation model: In this model, diarrhea is used as an indicator of infection and disease. Although this model can be used to characterize the interactions of Shigella and the intestinal mucosa at the natural site of infection, it has the difficulty that is introduced by surgery in laboratory animals .
Nonhuman primate (NHP) models: NHP models have been used to define the ability of vaccines to elicit immune responses and protection (rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys) . The main advantage of this model is that Shigella is able to colonize the large intestine and generate symptoms that these bacteria generate in human infection.
Various Subunits Development
Shigella Outer Membrane Vesicles.
Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are particles composed of LPS, proteins, and nucleic acids. In a proposed vaccine formulation, these particles were purified from liquid cultures of S. boydii by centrifugation with subsequent filtering (Fig. 9.13). The precise identity and amount of the proteins included in this preparation is not currently known, although the presence of proteins having the same mass as IpaB, IpaC, and IpaD suggests its composition includes these proteins. When these OMVs are administered orally to mice, antibodies are generated against OMV lysates.
This vaccine has the advantage of heterologous protection (as shown by challenge against strains from each Shigella serogroup) and the absence of adjuvant dependency. In addition, immunity can be passively transferred to offspring, suggesting that the protective mechanism involves antibodies and raising the possibility that this vaccine can be used in infants, which is the main target population for a Shigella vaccine. The use of live, fully virulent Shigella during its formulation process, the presence of LPS, and lot-to-lot consistency are possible downsides of this preparation.
Another vaccine candidate that uses T3SS proteins and LPS as part of the formulation is the Invaplex . These complexes are obtained by aqueous extraction followed by ion exchange chromatography (Fig. 9.13). The precise composition of these extracts has not been completely characterized but includes LPS, IpaB, and IpaC . These complexes are able to elicit IgG and IgA responses against Ipa proteins as well as LPS in both mice and guinea pigs. In addition, they are protective against the Shigella species/serotype used for extract generation  in the mouse and guinea pig challenge models.
Two phase one studies have been performed using the Invaplex vaccine on adult volunteers  and showed no major side effects to delivery of intranasal doses of up to 690 μg. The highest dose employed in these studies generated an ASC response to LPS in 58 % of the volunteers. An advantage of this approach is that, other than the Invaplex itself, no additional adjuvants need to be administered. A drawback of this vaccine consists in a challenging production process that includes cultures of virulent Shigella as well as the presence of bacterial LPS products in the intermediate steps and final formulation. Another possible caveat is the uniformity of protein composition in these complexes through manufacturing lots.
Recombinant T3SS Proteins.
A 34-kDa outer membrane protein (OMP) was purified from S. flexneri 2a using ion exchange chromatography. Incubation of macrophages with this 34-kDa protein induced the production of nitric oxide and increased production of IL-12 and TNF-α. This protein was delivered parenterally five times in rabbits, giving protection against challenge by S. flexneri in the rabbit cecal ligation model . Subsequent work using a recombinant protein purified by affinity chromatography identified this 34-kDa OMP as OmpA, part of a family of immunomodulating proteins present in numerous gram-negative bacteria. This protein showed high protective efficacy in the mouse lethal pulmonary model  where it elicited serum IgG and mucosal IgA.
9.4.2 Protein Subunit: Ticks3
Ticks are widely distributed throughout the world, affecting 80 % of the world’s cattle population . The economic importance of ticks and tick-borne diseases (TBDs) has been estimated by a number of studies; however they most likely represent an underestimation of the real impact of these arthropod vectors and their transmitted diseases.
Tick feeding has devastating effects including disease transmission, paralysis, toxicosis, and secondary infections of the tick-feeding site . The effect of ticks and tick-borne diseases is particularly pronounced in the livestock sector where it is repeatedly rated highly for its impact on the livelihood of farmers, particularly in countries of the South which are heavily dependent on agricultural production.
There are six genera of ixodid ticks of importance, namely, Amblyomma, Dermacentor, Haemaphysalis, Hyalomma, Rhipicephalus, and Ixodes.
Historically, tick and tick-borne disease control has focused on the control of ticks at tolerable levels through acaricide use and treatment of disease with appropriate drugs. In some cases acaricide-based tick control is often the only method of reducing tick populations without sacrificing productivity .
Acaricides are commercially available in a number of formulations that are applied either directly onto livestock or in dipping vats where multiple animals can be passed through at regular time intervals. Acaricide application relies heavily on correct formulation and administration to be effective. A large number of chemical compounds have been found to be effective against ticks including arsenic (introduced ~1983), DDT (~1946), cyclodienes and toxaphene (~1947), organophosphates-carbamate group (~1955), formamides (~1975), and macrocyclic lactones (~1981). The potency and usefulness of many of the abovementioned compounds is gradually eroding with resistance developing in many tick species of Rhipicephalus, Amblyomma, and Hyalomma.
Multiple acaricide-resistant tick stocks have been identified, limiting or entirely excluding the use of many acaricides . In addition to resistance, chemical control through acaricide application results in environmental pollution and residue tainting of meat and milk products.
Vaccination Against Ticks
The guiding principle for anti-tick vaccination stems from early studies conducted on acquired host resistance to tick infestations. Repeated exposure of hosts to ticks or tick organ homogenates induced resistance to tick re-infestation. While the degree of resistance may vary between different tick and host species, evidence strongly suggests that natural resistance against tick infestation develops based on adaptive immune response mechanisms . Ticks feeding from hosts vaccinated with tick components take up effector molecules during feeding that mediate deleterious effects on the ticks. This effect manifests as reduction of feeding time, tick mortality (during or after feeding), reduced engorgement weights, and reduced reproductive capacity of adult females. Eggs laid from ticks fed on vaccinated hosts may also show reduced hatching rates. The overall result culminates in reduction of tick populations and tick-borne diseases.
Anti-tick Vaccine Candidates.
Many of the anti-tick vaccine targets have been identified using conventional immune-screening techniques. Immunization of vertebrate hosts with tick homogenates or purified tick extracts generates immune sera. These sera are used to screen for tick antigens detected by the host.
The identification of tick proteins essential for tick survival is a useful method for more targeted antigen discovery, which is made increasingly possible as information is gathered on tick biology. With the availability of genome sequences for a number of tick species, the number of candidates for discovery is expanding through reverse vaccinology. The use of other techniques such as RNA interference (RNAi) has been useful in confirming the importance of anti-tick vaccine candidates and is likely to play a role in future anti-tick vaccine antigen discovery .
Exposed or Concealed Antigens.
Anti-tick vaccine candidates have been classified into two categories: exposed or concealed antigens. Exposed antigens are secreted in tick saliva during attachment and feeding on a host while concealed antigens are normally hidden from the host immune response. Molecular mimicry by ticks of host components has been observed, and vaccination may induce host sensitivity and autoimmune reactions when exposed antigens are used .
One advantage of using exposed antigens is that natural boosting occurs through tick feeding. Mechanistically, vaccination with exposed antigens is thought to induce a focal hostile environment unsupportive for tick attachment and feeding. Concealed antigens do not come into contact with the host immune response during natural tick feeding. Although often contained within the thoracic cavity of the tick, some salivary gland proteins can be characterized as concealed if they are not secreted into the tick-feeding site.
One difficulty in the development of concealed anti-tick vaccines is that the antigen must be accessible to the induced humoral vaccine response. This often limits the number of candidates to those coming into prolonged and direct contact with the blood meal or where the humoral response can be transported over the gut barrier into the hemolymph [50, 51, 52]. The second limitation of concealed antigens relates to natural boosting of the immune response. As the antigens do not come into contact with the immune response within the host, sufficiently high antibody levels must be induced through repeated vaccination.
As the blood meal acts as the carrier for the effector immune responses, the anti-tick effect can take place over a longer period of time compared to exposed antigens. This effect may even extend beyond the mere feeding period into the inactive stages where digestion and molting/egg laying takes place.
Bm86 Anti-tick Vaccine.
The Bm86-based anti-tick vaccine remains the only anti-tick vaccine commercially produced and has become the benchmark for future anti-tick vaccine development and evaluation. The gut-associated Bm86 glycoprotein was first identified in R. microplus although homologues in other tick species have since been identified [53, 54, 55]. The biological function of Bm86 remains unknown although it is thought to play a role in the digestion of the blood meal . In R. microplus, expression of Bm86 is increased during embryogenesis, reaching the highest level in unfed larvae. Expression decreases during feeding and molting with lowest levels of expression detected during the resting stages of the tick.
Bm86 has a translated coding sequence of 650 amino acids and a size of 71.7 kDa. The protein contains four potential N-linked glycosylation sites and a leader peptide suggesting transport to the cell surface. Localization studies have shown the molecule is located predominantly on the microvilli of gut epithelial cells. A single C-terminal transmembrane sequence is present in the unprocessed protein which is replaced by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor in the mature protein. The protein also contains multiple predicted EGF repeats rich in cysteine residues.
Vaccination has been performed mostly with the whole molecule, and protective epitopes for Bm86 have not been well determined. The site of a protective B cell epitope was defined and additional epitopes are likely to exist. Overlapping cross-reactive immune-reactive epitopes have been found between Bm86 and the R. decoloratus homologue, Bd86. Vaccine efficacy is directly related to anti-Bm86 antibody titer and the ability to control tick populations is directly related to achieving a strong antibody response.
Substantial animal-to-animal variation has been observed in the ability to generate anti-Bm86 antibody titers which is likely related to the MHC class II haplotypes expressed. Antibodies to Bm86 and cattle complement system are taken up during the blood meal. Antibody binding results in lysis of the gut epithelial cells culminating in impaired blood meal digestion. Strong antibody responses may induce tick mortality due to blood leakage from the gut into the hemolymph and ticks may turn reddish instead of gray.
Recombinant expression of Bm86 has been attempted in several expression systems including Escherichia coli, Aspergillus nidulans, Aspergillus niger, and Pichia pastoris. Vaccine trials showed that Bm86 vaccination targeted mainly the adult stage of R. microplus, particularly the number of adult females fully engorging and post-engorgement mortality. Reproductive capacity of adult R. microplus females was affected in terms of egg-laying capacity and hatching of eggs .
Under field situations, vaccination of cattle reduced tick numbers by 56 % within a single generation and reduced the reproductive capacity by 72 %. Reversal of negative effects of tick feeding on live weight of vaccinated animals by an average increase in live weight of 18.6 kg over a 6-month period was observed. Extensive field trials in Cuba, Brazil, Argentina, and Mexico showed between 55 and 100 % control of R. microplus ticks within a 36-week period .
Importantly, complete control of acaricide-resistant ticks could be accomplished by integrating Bm86 vaccination with acaricide use , showing that integrated control systems are effective in controlling tick populations. Vaccination also decreased the amount of acaricides required to control tick populations and prolonged the time interval between cattle dipping. Bm86 vaccination has been extensively evaluated for its ability to control other tick species. Almost complete cross-protection against Rhipicephalus annulatus has been reported . Significant protection against Hyalomma anatolicum, H. dromedarii, and R. decoloratus has been observed; however no cross-protection was seen against R. appendiculatus or Amblyomma variegatum.
9.5 Vector Vaccines
Genetic attenuated microorganisms as vaccine delivery systems
Viral vector systems
Bacterial vector systems
Adenovirus (e.g., AdV5)
Lactococcus lactis and
Adeno-associated virus (AAV)a
Modified vaccinia virus (MVV) strain Ankara
Salmonella typhi b
Alphaviral vector (e.g., Semliki forest virus (SFV)
Avipoxvirus (NYVAC and ALVAC)
Listeria monocytogenes b
The first Laboratory Biosafety Manual was published in 1983 and is now available with the third edition. The manual covers risk assessment and safe use of recombinant DNA technology and provides guidelines for certification of laboratories. The primary factors to consider in risk assessment fall into the main two categories, agent hazards and laboratory procedure hazards. The four biosafety levels, BSLs, consist of combinations of laboratory practices and techniques, safety equipment, and laboratory facilities and are measured as BSL 1, 2, 3, and 4 in rising order of danger.
Work with vectors classified as BSL-1 does not require biosafety program approval. Work with vectors classified as BSL-2 or higher requires approval by the local Biosafety Committee.
As demonstrated for adenovirus 5 (Ad5), following i.m. injection, the vector persisted mainly near the injection site and in draining lymph nodes for up to 6 months. Low levels of integration into chromosomal DNA were observed, with a calculated mutation rate of 2 × 10−7 mutations per cell. The spontaneous mutation rate of a cell is 2 × 10−6 and therefore tenfold higher. Ad5 is classified as biosafety level 2 (BSL-2).
Live vectors are able to stimulate the mucosal as well as a systemic humoral and cellular immunity. A severe drawback of the vector technology is that, once used, the vector cannot be effectively used in the patient again because it will be recognized by antibodies. Repeated booster immunization will fail. Also preexisting immunity in the patient against the vector could render the vaccination ineffective. A heterologous prime-boost and vector priming as described in Chap. 2 could circumvent this barrier.
9.5.1 Lactic Acid Bacteria Vector and Plague Disease4
220.127.116.11 Lactobacillus plantarum Platform
Lactic acid bacteria have generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status and have been developed in the past decade as potent adjuvants for mucosal delivery of vaccine. A platform technology based on Lactobacillus plantarum (Fig. 9.21) was developed to deliver antigens against plague disease caused by Yersinia pestis, an aerobic, nonmotile, gram-negative bacillus belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae, which is transmitted to humans via fleabite or via aerosol droplet, causing bubonic or pneumonic plague, respectively .
Most human plague cases present as one of three primary forms – bubonic, septicemic, or pneumonic. Secondary plague septicemia, pneumonia, and meningitis are the most common complications. The pathogenicity of Y. pestis results from its impressive ability to overcome the defenses of the mammalian host and to overwhelm it with massive growth.
18.104.22.168 The Enzootic Cycle and Transmission
Humans acquire this zoonotic infection via an atypical bite from animal fleas, sometimes prompted by an animal’s death from plague, after which the flea seeks a new source of blood. Most infected fleas come from the domestic black rat Rattus rattus or the brown sewer rat Rattus norvegicus.
Y. pestis cells spread from the site of the infected fleabite to the regional lymph nodes, grow to high numbers causing the formation of a bubo, and spill into the bloodstream where bacteria are removed in the liver and spleen. Growth continues in these organs, spreads to others, and causes septicemia. Fleas feeding on septicemic animals complete the infection cycle. In humans, bubonic plague can develop into an infection of the lung (secondary pneumonic plague) that can lead to aerosol transmission (primary pneumonic plague) . Multiple antibiotic-resistant strains of Y. pestis occur naturally and they can be easily bioengineered. Thus, plague is a category A bioterrorism agent in need for novel strategies for its prevention.
22.214.171.124 Clinical Disease
Bubonic plague is the classic form of the disease. Patients usually develop symptoms of fever, headache, chills, and swollen, extremely tender lymph nodes (buboes) within 2–6 days of contact with the organism either by fleabite or by exposure of open wounds to infected materials. Primary septicemic plague is generally defined as occurring in a patient with positive blood cultures but no palpable lymphadenopathy. Patients are febrile, and most have chills, headache, malaise, and gastrointestinal disturbances. Primary pneumonic plague is a rare but deadly form of the disease that is spread via respiratory droplets through close contact (2–5 ft) with an infected individual. It progresses rapidly from a febrile flu-like illness to an overwhelming pneumonia with coughing and the production of bloody sputum. The incubation period for primary pneumonic plague is between 1 and 3 days. In general, patients who develop secondary plague pneumonia have a high fatality rate.
126.96.36.199 Laboratory Diagnosis
The laboratory diagnosis of plague is based on bacteriological and/or serological evidence . Samples for analysis can include blood, bubo aspirates, sputum, cerebrospinal fluid in patients with plague meningitis, and scrapings from skin lesions, if present. Staining techniques such as the Gram, Giemsa, Wright, or Wayson stain can provide supportive but not presumptive or confirmatory evidence of a plague infection.
188.8.131.52 LAB-Based Vector Vaccines
LAB have been consumed for centuries by humans in fermented foods and have an extraordinary safety profile. These intrinsic advantages turn LAB into excellent delivery vectors of novel preventive and therapeutic molecules for humans. A number of studies of oral vaccines generated from genetically engineered pathogenic or commensal bacteria have been reported [66, 67].
Live attenuated pathogenic bacteria, such as derivatives of Mycobacterium, Salmonella, and Bordetella spp., are the most popular live delivery vectors used currently. They are particularly well adapted to interact with mucosal surfaces as they have specialized machinery to initiate the infection process. The major disadvantages of live vaccines include inadequate attenuation and the potential to revert to virulence.
Lactic acid bacteria-based vaccines act as live attenuated vaccines but without the safety concern. LAB have a generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status and thus are not likely to cause harm.
Intracellular, which allows the protein to escape harsh external environmental conditions (such as gastric juices in the stomach) but requires cellular lysis for protein release and delivery
Extracellular, which allows the release of the protein into the external medium, resulting in direct interaction with the environment (food product or the digestive tract)
Cell wall anchored, which combines the advantages of the other two locations (i.e., interaction between the cell wall-anchored protein and the environment, in addition to protection from proteolytic degradation)
In this context, several studies have compared the production of different antigens in LAB, using all three locations, and evaluated the subsequent immunological impact. These studies demonstrated that the highest immune response was obtained with cell wall-anchored antigens exposed on the surface of LAB. Therefore, most of the recent LAB vaccination studies have selected surface exposure of the antigen of interest, rather than intra- or extracellular production .
Dendritic cells (DCs) play a central role in bridging the innate immune system with the adaptive immune system. DCs are found throughout the body and are especially common at mucosal surfaces. With only a single layer of epithelial cells separating the external from the internal world amid the constant need for particle exchange, intestinal dendritic cells (DCs) play a key role in maintaining intestinal homeostasis as well as governing protective immune responses against invading pathogens. To avoid activation of self-reactive T cells and to limit unnecessary responses, such as those against commensal flora, DCs can imprint tolerance onto T cells (Fig. 9.22).
Evidence suggests that the peptidoglycan layer of some LAB promote natural immuno-adjuvanticity , and antigen localization on the cell wall makes it more accessible to the immune system as compared to intracellular or secreted proteins. Leader peptides mark proteins for translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane, and lipid modification is of major importance both for anchoring exported proteins to the membrane and for protein function . It has been shown that lipidation at the first amino acid of the mature Borrelia burgdorferi OspA protein is essential to induce an immune response via TLR2 . The leader peptide of OspA targets the protein to the cell envelope of Lactobacillus and that the Cys  is recognized by the L. plantarum cell wall-sorting machinery that lipidates and anchors the protein to the cell envelope. The end result is a delivery system that exerts a potent adjuvant effect .
9.6 Virus-like Particles: Norovirus Gastroenteritis5
Gastroenteritis (GE) and its associated diarrheal diseases remain as one of the top causes of death in the world. Noroviruses (NoVs) are a group of genetically diverse RNA viruses that cause the great majority of nonbacterial gastroenteritis in humans. However, there is still no vaccine licensed for human use to prevent NoV GE. The lack of a tissue culture system and a small animal model further hinders the development of NoV vaccines.
Virus-like Particles (VLPs) that mimic the antigenic architecture of authentic virions, however, can be produced in insect, mammalian, and plant cells by the expression of the capsid protein. The particulate nature and high-density presentation of viral structure proteins on their surface render VLPs as a premier vaccine platform with superior safety, immunogenicity, and manufacturability. Therefore, this chapter focuses on the development of effective NoV vaccines based on VLPs of capsid proteins. The expression and structure of NoV VLPs, especially VLPs of Norwalk virus, the prototype NoV, are extensively discussed. The ability of NoV VLPs in stimulating a potent systemic and mucosal anti-NoV immunity through oral and intranasal delivery in mice is presented.
Gastroenteritis (GE) is a worldwide health problem that affects people of all ages. As its name implies, GE is characterized by inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract and often associated with symptoms of diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal cramping and pain. GE and its associated diarrheal diseases remain as one of the top causes of death in the world especially in developing countries and in young children with an estimated death toll of four to six million per year . GE can be caused by a variety of pathogens including viruses, bacteria, and parasites and by ingestion of noninfectious toxins or medications, with viruses as the most common offending agents. Norovirus (NoV) and rotavirus are the most common viruses that cause viral GE, while adenovirus, astrovirus, coronavirus, and parechovirus are also known to cause GE in humans.
NoVs are a group of genetically diverse RNA viruses that belong to the genus of Norovirus in the Caliciviridae family . They were first discovered and characterized in their prototype virus, the Norwalk virus (NV), in 1972 . Studies of NV revealed that NoVs are non-enveloped viruses with a RNA genome surrounded by a round capsid protein shell approximately 38 nm in diameter.
NoVs are divided into 5 genogroups and 29 clusters with 8 clusters in genogroup I (GI), 17 in GII, 2 in GIII, and 1 each in GIV and GV. Within the five genotypes, GI and GIV strains are found to infect humans exclusively and GII are found in both humans and pigs, while GIII and GV strains are animal viruses that infect cattle and murine species, respectively . Currently, strains in cluster 4 of GII (GII 4) are the most prevalent NoVs in human population .
Transmission and Infection Cycle of NoVs.
NoVs require an extremely low infectious dose, as challenge studies with NV have suggested that the probability of infection with a single virus particle is approximately 50 % among susceptible human populations. They can be transmitted by several routes including fecal-contaminated food or water, direct person to person contact, indirect exposure through droplets, or contaminated objects of infected persons.
NoVs are highly contagious and spread rapidly, and their outbreaks commonly occur in various social places and settings where people share common food and water sources or are in close physical proximity, such as cruise ships, schools, military units, nursing homes, daycare centers, hospitals, restaurants, and catered events .
The life cycle of NoV has not been fully understood due to the lack of an in vitro cell culture system and a small animal model of infection. The failure of NoV replication in mammalian cell cultures is not due to the lack of host factors to support intracellular expression of NoV RNA. Instead, the problem may lie in the steps of viral binding to cellular receptors, virus entry into cells.
Current Diagnostic Methods and Therapeutics for NoV GE.
Various diagnostic methods have been developed for NoV . While serum antibodies to NoV can be readily detected, this method has little clinical relevance due to the cross-reactivity of antibodies. Since there is no culture system available for NoV, the detection of virus in stool samples has become the preferred method of diagnosis. Traditionally, NoV infection was diagnosed by detecting the virus by immune transmission electron microscopy (TEM). TEM offers the advantage of direct visualization of any potentially responsible virus particles in stool samples. However, it does have the disadvantage of requiring sophisticated and expensive equipment and highly specialized technicians for its operation.
Several enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) that detect NoV antigens were later developed for NoV diagnosis. Studies have shown that NoV antigen-detecting ELISAs have high specificity (94–96 %) but poor sensitivity (40–60 %), most likely due to the antigenic diversity of NoV strains .
Similar to ELISA-based assays, RT-PCR is rapid and robust, because it can process large numbers of samples simultaneously and results can be obtained within a working day. However, it requires RNA extraction from fecal samples and needs expensive equipment and skilled workers to operate. Therefore, RT-PCR is more labor intensive and less economical than ELISAs.
Overall, TEM, ELISA, and RT-PCR-based methods all have their advantages and challenges. The three methods detect different components of the virus and therefore are complementary to each other.
Immunology of NoV Infection.
The immunological knowledge of NoV is mostly obtained from human challenge studies and natural outbreaks due to the lack of small animal models. Observations of repeat infections in adults suggest the scarcity of long-term immunity against these viruses. However, other studies showed that close to 50 % of the genetically susceptible subjects were not infected by NoV challenge, which support the possibility of long-term immunity .
Virus-like Particles as an Effective Vaccine Against NoV.
The lack of a tissue culture system also impedes the development of vaccines against NoV. Fortunately, the discovery of the spontaneous assembly of expressed VP1 into virus-like particles (VLPs) that are morphologically and antigenically similar to the native viruses has facilitated vaccine development. VLPs combine the best traits of whole-virus and subunit antigens for vaccine development.
VLPs are noninfectious, therefore, safer than inactivated or attenuated virus due to the lack of viral nucleic acid genome. Importantly, VLPs can induce potent cellular and humoral immune responses without adjuvants and are more effective vaccines than other subunit antigens because their architectures mimic infectious viruses. VLPs can be produced by recombinant technology in heterologous expression systems without requiring the ability to support viral replication. This is particularly important for NoV because no such culture system has been developed to support the growth of these viruses.
Studies have demonstrated that viruses and corresponding VLPs have a particle size ideal for DC and macrophage uptake to initiate antigen processing . Thus, the particulate nature of VLPs favors their targeting to relevant APCs for optimal induction of T cell-mediated immune responses.
VLPs can also be presented efficiently to B cells and induce strong antibody responses. Like live viruses, the quasicrystalline surface of VLPs, with its arrays of repetitive epitopes, presents a prime target that vertebrate B cells have evolved to specifically recognize. This recognition triggers the cross-linking of surface membrane-associated immunoglobulins (Ig) on B cells and leads to their proliferation and migration, T helper-cell activation, antibody production and secretion, and the generation of memory B cells. Thus, VLPs can directly activate B cells at much lower concentrations than other subunit antigens and induce high titer and durable B cell responses in the absence of adjuvants.
These inherent advantages of VLPs have made them one of the most successful recombinant vaccine platforms. For example, five VLP-based vaccines for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human papillomavirus (HPV) have been commercially licensed, and all have demonstrated excellent safety profiles and long-term protection against infection in humans.
Characterization of NoV VLPs.
The structure of NoV VLPs is exemplified by the VLP of NV capsid protein (NVCP). Studies of insect cell-baculovirus-derived NVCP VLPs by cryo-electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography reveal that the NV capsid is a 38 nm icosahedral arrangement of 180 copies of the 58 kDa capsid protein VP1 organized into 90 dimers in a T = 3 symmetry. While all dimers are formed from two identical NVCP monomers, two different dimer configurations are required to correctly form the complete assembled capsid .
As in native NV particles, the NVCP also folds into two distinctive domains in VLPs, with S domain forming the inner core of the shell and P domain protruding out from the capsid . Similarly, the P2 subdomain is also the most surface-exposed region in NV VLPs and may contain HBGA and neutralizing antibody-binding sites and determinants of strains specificity [93, 94]. The similarity between VLPs of NV and other NoVs including GII.4 viruses has been demonstrated .
Insect Cell-Baculovirus Vector-Produced NVCP VLPs.
It was shown that four oral doses of as little as 5 μg NVCP VLPs without any adjuvant triggered serum NV-specific anti-IgG response in the majority (8/11) of VLP-fed iCD1 outbred mice . Systemic IgG response was observed after two oral dosages and the highest titer was induced by four doses of 200 μg VLPs. Moreover, mice in the 200 μg dosage group developed NV-specific intestinal IgA in a level up to 0.1 % of total IgA. Inclusion of the mucosal adjuvant cholera toxin (CT) did not significantly change the number of positive responders of serum IgG or intestinal IgA but significantly enhanced the amplitude of serum IgG response, especially for higher doses of VLPs. Thus, NVCP VLP is clearly a potent oral immunogen and can induce both systemic and gut mucosal antibody responses.
9.7 Nanovaccines: GAS Infections6
Group A streptococcus (Streptococcus pyogenes) (GAS) is an important human mucosal pathogen that is responsible for a wide spectrum of diseases with varying clinical manifestations and severity [96, 97]: Pharyngitis (strep throat) is a common minor complication of GAS infection but when left untreated can lead to life-threatening diseases including the autoimmune sequelae rheumatic fever (RF) and rheumatic heart disease (RHD). RHD results in permanent damage to the heart tissues and valves.
GAS infections cause >500,000 deaths each year mostly in developing countries and indigenous populations within developed nations where poor socioeconomic conditions and overcrowding contribute to the high rates of GAS diseases. In developing countries, RF is the leading cause of heart disease among children . There is currently no available vaccine to prevent infection with GAS and consequently prevent GAS diseases.
GAS M Antigen.
An effective GAS vaccine needs to have broad antigenic reach because of the many different GAS strains (>150 different M types) circulating in a population and should not induce immune responses that are potentially cross-reactive with self tissue proteins. The GAS M protein is the major protective antigen and an ideal target for vaccine development; however it contains heart tissue cross-reactive epitopes particularly in the conserved region . Evidence suggests that cross-reactive T cells especially play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of RHD.
Multivalent GAS vaccine. A multivalent approach employs a combination of amino-terminal protein fragments representing different M types and is designed to target prevalent GAS strains in a population. Using this approach, a recombinant multivalent GAS vaccine containing M protein peptides from 26 different GAS serotypes prevalent in North America was demonstrated to evoke opsonic antibodies in animals . From epidemiological data, the 26-valent vaccine would cover the majority of pharyngitis and invasive GAS diseases, including RF, invasive fasciitis, and toxic shock syndrome. Recently, a new 30-valent GAS vaccine was shown to be immunogenic in rabbits and evoked opsonic antibodies against “non-vaccine” serotypes  potentially creating a vaccine with much broader coverage. This type of vaccine is population specific and therefore may not be effective universally. It may also need to be re-designed periodically to reflect changes in the epidemiology of GAS infections.
J8 vaccine. A GAS vaccine that employs peptide epitopes from the conserved C-repeat region of the M protein is the second approach and has the potential in theory for greater coverage of M types. Immunization of mice with a C-region peptide GAS vaccine candidate called J8 conjugated to the carrier protein diphtheria toxoid (dT) and co-delivery with an appropriate adjuvant led to protection against systemic and mucosal GAS infection  (Fig. 9.29).
J8 also elicited protective immunity against GAS when linked to lipopeptides [105, 106]. Other studies have shown that intranasal immunization of mice with C-region peptides conjugated to the experimental mucosal adjuvant cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) evoked protective immunity against GAS at the mucosal level . CTB could possibly enter olfactory regions of the central nervous system and cause neuronal damage following intranasal delivery  and therefore is not suitable for human use. Vector delivery approaches have included expressing the C-repeat region on vaccinia virus , the commensal bacterium Lactococcus lactis , or Streptococcus gordonii  .
J14. The third combination vaccine approach uses both serotypic and conserved M protein peptide epitopes. Initially, a heteropolymer GAS vaccine construct was synthesized by free radical-induced polymerization of acryloyl peptides to combine seven serotypic epitopes and a highly conserved C-region peptide epitope called J14 . The M types that were targeted in the heteropolymer represented GAS infections prevalent in the Northern Territory of Australia – a region highly endemic for GAS. Immunization of mice with the heteropolymer demonstrated excellent immunogenicity and protection against homologous and heterologous GAS strains, indicating its potential to provide broad coverage.
However, batch-to-batch variation led to altered immune responses, which limited its applicability for human use. The vaccine also required the addition of an adjuvant to be effective, further limiting its use as a mucosal vaccine due to a lack of safe and effective mucosal adjuvants. Later, multiepitope GAS vaccine candidates were synthesized based on the LCP system that induced highly opsonic antibodies following parenteral delivery to mice , as well as protection against mucosal GAS infection following intranasal immunization  (Fig. 9.29).
Safety and Efficacy.
The main concern when using large regions of the M protein in a GAS vaccine is the potential for inducing an autoimmune response due to immunological cross-reactivity with host proteins. It is therefore important to identify protective antigenic determinants and to separate the biological relevant epitopes from those that are host tissue cross-reactive and potentially harmful. Epitope mapping studies were used to identify the conserved GAS vaccine candidate J8, which contains a conformational protective B cell epitope and was designed to lack a human heart cross-reactive T cell epitope [115, 116].
Oral vaccination of honey bees against Varroa destructor by Sebastian Giese and Matthias Giese in Molecular Vaccines – From Prophylaxis to Therapy, Volume 2, Springer-Verlag Wien, 2013, Ed. Matthias Giese.
Development of subunit vaccines against shigellosis: An update by Francisco J. Martinez-Becerra, Olivia Arizmendi, Jamie C. Greenwood II and Wendy L. Picking in Molecular Vaccines – From Prophylaxis to Therapy, Volume 2, Springer-Verlag Wien, 2013, Ed. Matthias Giese.
Anti-tick vaccines for the control of ticks affecting livestock by Cassandra Olds, Richard Bishop and Claudia Daubenberger in Molecular Vaccines – From Prophylaxis to Therapy, Volume 2, Springer-Verlag Wien, 2013, Ed. Matthias Giese.
Lactic acid bacteria vector vaccines by Maria Gomes-Solecki in Molecular Vaccines – From Prophylaxis to Therapy, Volume 2, Springer-Verlag Wien, 2013, Ed. Matthias Giese.
Virus-like Particle Vaccines for Norovirus Gastroenteritis by Qiang Chen in Molecular Vaccines – From Prophylaxis to Therapy, Volume 2, Springer-Verlag Wien, 2013, Ed. Matthias Giese.
Development of subunit vaccines for group A streptococcus by Colleen Olive in Molecular Vaccines – From Prophylaxis to Therapy, Volume 2, Springer-Verlag Wien, 2013, Ed. Matthias Giese.
- 1.Rodrigo Ferracine, R., Rogério Silva, R., Fabiani Gai, F., Frederico Gonzalez Colombo, A., Gaziola de la Torre, L., Celio Lopes, S.: TB vaccines – state of the art and progresses. In: Matthias, G. (ed.) Molecular Vaccines – From Prophylaxis to Therapy, vol. 2. Springer, Wien (2013)Google Scholar
- 3.Davis, B.S., et al.: West Nile virus recombinant DNA vaccine protects mouse and horse from virus challenge and expresses in vitro a noninfectious recombinant antigen that can be used in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. J. Virol. 75, 4040–4047 (2001). doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.9.4040-4047.2001 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Mondet, F., Goodwin, M., Mercer, A.: Age-related changes in the behavioural response of honeybees to Apiguard(R), a thymol-based treatment used to control the mite Varroa destructor. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 197, 1055–1062 (2011). doi: 10.1007/s00359-011-0666-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.McCosker, P.J.: Global aspects of the management and control of ticks of veterinary importance. In: Rodriguez, J. (ed.) Recent Advances in Acarology. Academic, New York (1979)Google Scholar
- 53.Peconick, A.P., Sossai, S., Girão, F.A., Rodrigues, M.Q., Souza, E.S., Guzman, Q.F., Patarroyo, V.A.M., Vargas, M.I., Patarroyo, J.H.: Synthetic vaccine (SBm7462) against the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus: preservation of immunogenic determinants in different strains from South America. Exp. Parasitol. 119, 37–43 (2008)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 55.Kamau, L., Skilton, R.A., Odongo, D.O., Mwaura, S., Githaka, N., Kanduma, E., Obura, M., Kabiru, E., Orago, A., et al.: Differential transcription of two highly divergent gut-expressed Bm86 antigen gene homologues in the tick Rhipicephalus appendiculatus (Acari: Ixodida). Insect Mol. Biol. 20, 105–114 (2011)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 63.Straley, S.C., Starnbach, M.N.: Yersinia: Strategies That Thwart Immune Defenses, pp. 71–92. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia (2000)Google Scholar
- 64.Poland, J. D. a. A. M. B.: Plague. In: CRC Handbook Series in Zoonoses. Section A. Bacterial, Rickettsial, Chlamydial and Mycotic Diseases, vol. I, pp. 515–559. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA (1979)Google Scholar
- 66.Peters, C., Peng, X., Douven, D., Pan, Z.K., Paterson, Y.: The induction of HIV Gag-specific CD8+ T cells in the spleen and gut-associated lymphoid tissue by parenteral or mucosal immunization with recombinant Listeria monocytogenes HIV Gag. J. Immunol. 170, 5176–5187 (2003)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 104.Batzloff, M.R., Hayman, W.A., Davies, M.R., Zeng, M., Pruksakorn, S., Brandt, E.R., Good, M.F.: Protection against group A streptococcus by immunization with J8-diptheria toxoid: Contribution of J8- and diphtheria toxoid-specific antibodies to protection. J. Infect. Dis. 187, 1598–1608 (2003)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 105.Batzloff, M.R., Hartas, J., Zeng, W., Jackson, D.C., Good, M.F.: Intranasal vaccination with a lipopeptide containing a minimal, conformationally constrained conserved peptide, a universal T-cell epitope and a self-adjuvanting lipid protects mice from Streptococcus pyogenes and reduces throat carriage. J. Infect. Dis. 194, 325–330 (2006)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 111.Kotloff, K.L., Wasserman, S.S., Jones, K.F., Livio, S., Hruby, D.E., Franke, C.A., Fischetti, V.A.: Clinical and microbiological responses of volunteers to combined intranasal and oral inoculation with a Streptococcus gordonii carrier strain intended for future use as a group A streptococcus vaccine. Infect. Immun. 73, 2360–2366 (2005)PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 114.Olive, C., Kuo Sun, H., Ho, M.-F., Dyer, J., Horvath, A., Toth, I., Good, M.F.: Intranasal administration is an effective mucosal vaccine delivery route for self-adjuvanting lipid core peptides targeting the group A streptococcal M protein. J. Infect. Dis. 194, 316–324 (2006)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar