The Borda Count, the Intersection and the Highest Rank Method in a Dispersed Decision-Making System
The main aim of the article is to compare the results obtained using three different methods of conflict analysis in a dispersed decision-making system. The conflict analysis methods, used in the article, are discussed in the paper of Ho, Hull and Srihari  and in the book of Black . All these methods are used if the individual classifiers generate rankings of classes instead of unique class choices. The first method is the Borda count method, which is a generalization of the majority vote. The second is the intersection method, which belong to the class set reduction method. The third one is the highest rank method, which belong to the methods for class set reordering. All of these methods were used in a dispersed decision-making system which was proposed in the paper .
KeywordsDecision-making system Global decision Conflict analysis Borda count method Intersection method Highest rank method
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.