A Three-Way Decision Making Approach to Malware Analysis
Malware analysis techniques generally classify software behaviors as malicious (i.e., harmful) or benign (i.e., not harmful). Due to ambiguous nature of application behavior, there are cases where it may not be possible to confidently reach two-way conclusions. This may result in higher classification errors which in turn affect users trust on malware analysis outcomes. In this paper, we investigate a three-way decision making approach based on probabilistic rough set models, such as, information-theoretic rough sets and game-theoretic rough sets, for malware analysis. The essential idea is to add a third option of deferment or delaying a decision whenever the available information is not sufficient to reach certain conclusions. We demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach with an example from system call sequences of a vulnerable Linux application.
This work was partially supported by a discovery grant from NSERC canada.
- 2.Biddle, R., van Oorschot, P.C., Patrick, A.S., Sobey, J., Whalen, T.: Browser interfaces and extended validation ssl certificates: an empirical study. In: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM Workshop on Cloud Computing Security, pp. 19–30 (2009)Google Scholar
- 6.Forrest, S., Hofmeyr, S.A., Somayaji, A., Longstaff, T.A.: UNM dataset. http://www.cs.unm.edu/immsec/data-sets.htm. Accessed 6 April 2015
- 7.Forrest, S., Hofmeyr, S.A., Somayaji, A., Longstaff, T.A.: A sense of self for unix processes. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 120–128 (1996)Google Scholar
- 8.Gandotra, E., Bansal, D., Sofat, S.: Malware analysis and classification: a survey. J. Inf. Secur. 5, 56–64 (2014)Google Scholar
- 12.Mehdi, B., Ahmed, F., Khayyam, S.A., Farooq, M.: Towards a theory of generalizing system call representation for in-execution malware detection. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–5 (2010)Google Scholar
- 14.Symantec: Internet security threat report, vol. 19. http://www.symantec.com/security_response/publications/threatreport.jsp. Accessed 12 April 2015
- 15.Tanenbaum, A.S., Woodhull, A.S.: Operating systems: design and implementation, vol. 2. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1987) Google Scholar
- 16.Wright, C., Cowan, C., Morris, J., Smalley, S., Kroah-Hartman, G.: Linux security module framework. In: Ottawa Linux Symposium, vol. 8032, pp. 6–16 (2002)Google Scholar
- 17.Yang, H., Li, T., Hu, X., Wang, F., Zou, Y.: A survey of artificial immune system based intrusion detection. The Scientific World Journal (2014)Google Scholar
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.