Advertisement

Information, Policy, and Sustainability: The Role of Information Technology in the Age of Big Data and Open Government

  • Jing ZhangEmail author
  • Luis F. Luna-Reyes
  • Theresa A. Pardo
Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 20)

Abstract

Sustainability has become an important focus for government, civil society, and the corporate community worldwide (United Nations Environment Programme 2011). Growing interest in addressing environmental deterioration and associated social inequality and economic challenges is shifting focus to this important issue. The lack of fresh water and arable land, extreme weather, rising cost of relying on fossil fuels, and poverty and regional instability are drawing attention to the need for government intervention and policy instruments that encourage the development of sustainable alternatives.

Keywords

Environmental Sustainability Stakeholder Engagement Policy Modeling Stakeholder Involvement Sustainable Consumption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This book was supported in part the U.S. National Science Foundation, Grant # 0955935 and the Mexican Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (National Council on Science and Technology, CONACYT) Grant # 133670. We wish to acknowledge Alan Kowlowitz, Government Fellow at the Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, State University of New York, for his help in producing this chapter.

References

  1. Ackermann F, Andersen DF, Eden C, Richardson GP (2011) ScriptsMap: a tool for designing multi-method policy-making workshops. Omega 39:427–434. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2010.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen DF (1980) How differences in analytic paradigms can lead to differences in policy conclusions. In: Randers J (ed) Elements of the system dynamics method. Productivity Press, Cambridge, pp 61–75Google Scholar
  3. Andersen DF, Richardson GP (1997) Scripts for group model building. Syst Dyn Rev 13:107–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett CL, Eubank S, Marathe A et al (2011) Information integration to support model-based policy informatics. Innov J 16:1–19Google Scholar
  5. Basiago AD (1995) Methods of defining “sustainability”. Sustain Dev 3:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Black LJ, Andersen DF (2012) Using visual representations as boundary objects to resolve conflict in collaborative model-building approaches. Syst Res Behav Sci 29:194–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown BJ, Hanson ME, Liverman DM, Merideth RW Jr (1987) Global sustainability: toward definition. Environ Manage 11:713–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brundtland GH (1987) Report of the World Commission on environment and development: our common future. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Bryson JM, Ackermann F, Eden C, Finn CB (2004) Visible thinking: unlocking causal mapping for practical business results, 1st edn. Wiley, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  10. Charalabidis Y, Triantafillou A, Karkaletsis V, Loukis E (2012) Public policy formulation through non moderated crowdsourcing in social media. In: Tambouris E, Macintosh A, Sæbø Ø (eds) Electronic participation. Springer, Berlin, pp 156–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cockerill K, Daniel L, Malczynski L, Tidwell V (2009) A fresh look at a policy sciences methodology: collaborative modeling for more effective policy. Policy Sci 42:211–225. doi: 10.1007/s11077-009-9080-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dawes SS (2010) Stewardship and usefulness: policy principles for information-based transparency. Gov Inf Q 27:377–383. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dawes SS, Helbig N (2010) Information strategies for open government: challenges and prospects for deriving public value from government transparency. In: Wimmer MA, Chappelet J-L, Janssen M, Scholl HJ (eds) Electronic Government: 9th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2010, Lausanne, Switzerland, August/September 2010: Proceedings. Springer, Berlin, pp 50–60Google Scholar
  14. Dawes SS, Janssen M (2013) Policy informatics: addressing complex problems with rich data, computational tools, and stakeholder engagement. ACM, New York, pp 251–253Google Scholar
  15. Dawes SS, Pardo TA, Cresswell AM (2004a) Designing electronic government information access programs. Gov Inf Q 21:3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dawes SS, Pardo TA, Simon S et al (2004b) Making smart IT choices: understanding value and risk in government IT investments. Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, SUNY, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  17. Dawes SS, Helbig N, Nampoothiri S (2014) Workshop report: exploring the integration of data-intensive analytical skills in public affairs education. Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, SUNY, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  18. Dovers S (2005) Environment and sustainability policy: creation, implementation, evaluation. Federation, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  19. Eden C, Ackermann F, Bryson JM et al (2009) Integrating modes of policy analysis and strategic management practice: requisite elements and dilemmas. J Oper Res Soc 60:2–13. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602575 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Forrester JW (1973) World dynamics, 2nd edn. Pegasus Communications, WalthamGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerald D, Lave LB (2005) Implementing technology-forcing policies: the 1970 clean Air Act amendments and the introduction of advanced automotive emissions controls in the United States. Technol Forecast Soc Change 72:761–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harrison TM, Pardo TA, Cook M (2012) Creating open government ecosystems: a research and development agenda. Future Internet 4:900–928. doi: 10.3390/fi4040900 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Helbig N, Cresswell AM, Burke BG, Luna-Reyes LF (2012a) The dynamics of opening government data. Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, SUNY, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  24. Helbig N, Nakashima M, Dawes SS (2012b) Understanding the value and limits of government information in policy informatics: a preliminary exploration. In: Proceedings of the 13th annual international conference on Digital Government Research. ACM, New York, pp 291–293Google Scholar
  25. Hovmand PS, Andersen DF, Rouwette E et al (2012) Group model-building “scripts” as a collaborative planning tool. Syst Res Behav Sci 29:179–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hovmand PS, Rouwette EAJA, Andersen DF et al (2013) Scriptapedia 4.0.6Google Scholar
  27. Huq M, Wheeler D (1993) Pollution reduction without formal regulation: evidence from Bangladesh. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Jackson MC (2003) Systems thinking: creative holism for managers, 1st edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  29. Jaffe AB, Newell RG, Stavins RN (2005) A tale of two market failures: technology and environmental policy. Ecol Econ 54:164–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Janssen M, Cresswell AM (2005) An enterprise application integration methodology for e-government. J Enterp Inf Manag 18:531–547. doi: 10.1108/17410390510623990 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Janssen M, Charalabidis Y, Zuiderwijk A (2012) Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Inf Syst Manag 29:258–268. doi: 10.1080/10580530.2012.716740 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnston E, Kim Y (2011) Introduction to the special issue on policy informatics. Innov J 16:1–4Google Scholar
  33. Kim Y, Johnston EW, Kang HS (2011) A computational approach to managing performance dynamics in networked governance systems. Public Perform Manag Rev 34:580–597. doi: 10.2753/PMR1530-9576340407 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Klievink B, Janssen M (2010) Simulation gaming as a social development instrument: dealing with complex problems. Inf Polity Int J Gov Democr Inf Age 15:153–165. doi: 10.3233/IP-2010-0204 Google Scholar
  35. Klischewski R (2012) Identifying informational needs for open government: the case of Egypt. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 2482–2490Google Scholar
  36. Lampe C, LaRose R, Steinfield C, DeMaagd K (2011) Inherent barriers to the use of social media for public policy informatics. Innov J 16:1–17Google Scholar
  37. Lampe C, Zube P, Lee J et al (2014) Crowdsourcing civility: a natural experiment examining the effects of distributed moderation in online forums. Gov Inf Q 31:317–326. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maheshwari D, Janssen M (2014) Reconceptualizing measuring, benchmarking for improving interoperability in smart ecosystems: the effect of ubiquitous data and crowdsourcing. Gov Inf Q 31:S84–S92. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Noveck BS (2009) Wiki government: how technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Brooking Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. Nunamaker JF Jr (1989) Experience with and future challenges in GDSS (group decision support systems): preface. Decis Support Syst 5:115–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pardo TA, Gil-Garcia JR, Luna-Reyes LF (2008) Collaborative governance and cross-boundary information sharing: envisioning a networked and IT-enabled public administration. Lake PlacidGoogle Scholar
  42. Pidd M (2010) Tools for thinking: modelling in management science, 3rd edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  43. Puron-Cid G, Gil-Garcia JR, Luna-Reyes LF (2012) IT-enabled policy analysis: new technologies, sophisticated analysis and open data for better government decisions. In: Proceedings of the 13th annual international conference on Digital Government Research. ACM, New York, pp 97–106Google Scholar
  44. Puron-Cid G, Gil-Garcia JR, Luna-Reyes LF (2014) Opportunities and challenges of policy informatics: tackling complex problems through the combination of open data, technology and analytics. Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económica CIDE, AguascalientesGoogle Scholar
  45. Randers J (2012) 2052: a global forecast for the next forty years. Chelsea Green, White River JunctionGoogle Scholar
  46. Rethemeyer RK (2007) Policymaking in the Age of internet: is the internet tending to make policy networks more or less inclusive? J Public Adm Res Theory 17:259–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Richardson GP, Andersen DF (1995) Teamwork in group model building. Syst Dyn Rev 11:113–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Richardson GP, Andersen DF, Luna-Reyes LF (2015) Joining minds: group system dynamics modeling to create public value. In: Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Bloomberg L (eds) Valuing public value. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  49. Robinson DG, Yu H, Zeller WP, Felten EW (2009) Government data and the invisible hand. Yale J Law Technol 11:160Google Scholar
  50. Rohrbaugh J (1992) Cognitive challenges and collective accomplishments. In: Bostrom RWR, Kinney ST (eds) Computer augmented teamwork: a guided tour. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 299–324Google Scholar
  51. Ruiz Estrada MA (2011) Policy modeling: definition, classification and evaluation. J Policy Model 33:523–536. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2011.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ruiz Estrada MA, Yap SF (2013) The origins and evolution of policy modeling. J Policy Model 35:170–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2011.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sayogo DS, Zhang J, Luna-Reyes L et al (2014) Challenges and requirements for developing data architecture supporting integration of sustainable supply chains. Inf Technol Manag 16(1):5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schlosberg D, Zavestoski S, Shulman SW (2007) Democracy and E-rulemaking: web-based technologies, participation, and the potential for deliberation. J Inf Technol Polit 4:37–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sonntagbauer P, Nazemi K, Sonntagbauer S et al (2014) Handbook of research on advanced ICT integration for governance and policy modeling. IGI Global, HersheyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Spiro ES, Johnson B, Fitzhugh S et al (2014) Warning tweets: serial transmission of messages during the warning phase of a disaster event. Inf Commun Soc 17:765–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stavins, R. N. (2007). A US Cap and Trade System to Address Global Climate Change, Research Working Paper 07-052, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  58. Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  59. UN General Assembly (2000) United Nations Millennium Declaration: resolution. UN, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. United Nations Environment Programme (2011) Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. United Nations Environment Programme, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  61. Zagonel AA, Rohrbaugh J, Richardson GP, Andersen DF (2004) Using simulation models to address “what if” questions about welfare reform. J Policy Anal Manage 23:890–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zuiderwijk A, Janssen M, Davis C (2014) Innovation with open data: essential elements of open data ecosystems. Inf Polity Int J Gov Democr Inf Age 19:17–33. doi: 10.3233/IP-140329 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jing Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Luis F. Luna-Reyes
    • 2
  • Theresa A. Pardo
    • 2
  1. 1.Clark UniversityWorcesterUSA
  2. 2.University at AlbanyAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations