Advertisement

Metadata Analytics, Law, and the Future of the Internet

  • Ana BosslerEmail author
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 17)

Abstract

The handling of information by governments and corporations has become a sensitive legal issue, because people feel increasingly uncomfortable with the capacity of data analytics to predict behavior. These violations of privacy are creating precedents for serious abuses. Possible futures of the Internet must deal with the tension among security, economic incentives, and personal privacy. The Internet, as a political-economic space, establishes a new frontier where the relationship between constitutional law (e.g., the political dimension) and regulation (e.g., the economic dimension) has the potential to produce a new legal framework that takes into account developments such as metadata. This chapter reflects on the changing nature of political interactions via the Internet. The rise of metadata and related privacy implications are discussed. Then, legal and regulatory responses are outlined. Finally, three scenarios related to future of the Internet are presented.

Keywords

Metadata Big data Privacy Security Law 

References

  1. Agambem G (1995) Homo sacer. Il potere sovrano e la nuda vita. ¿ Giulio Einaudi editore s.p.a.Google Scholar
  2. Bauman Z (2006) Liquid times: living in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. Brazil (2012) Lei 12.737.2012. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2012/lei/l12737.htmGoogle Scholar
  4. Byrne C (2015) The golden age of quantum computing is upon us (once we solve these tiny problems). http://www.fastcompany.com/3045708/big-tiny-problems-for-quantum-computingGoogle Scholar
  5. European Commission (2012) Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/document/review2012/com_2012_11_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
  6. European Court of Human Rights (2014) Factsheet on the “Right to be Forgotten” ruling (C-131-12). http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/files/factsheets/factsheet_data_protection_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferran L (2014) Ex-NSA chief: ‘We kill people based on metadata.’ http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2014/05/ex-nsa-chief-we-kill-people-based-on-metadata/Google Scholar
  8. Hill K (2012) How Target figured out a teen girl was pregnant before her father did. http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2012/02/16/how-target-figured-out-a-teen-girl-was-pregnant-before-her-father-did/Google Scholar
  9. Hui K-L, Png IPL (2006) The economics of privacy. In: Hendershott T (ed) Handbooks in information systems, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 471–497Google Scholar
  10. Husovec M (2014) First European Constitutional Court suspends data retention after the decision of the Court of Justice of EU. http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2014/04/first-european-constitutional-court-suspends-data-retention-after-decision-courtGoogle Scholar
  11. Ipsos MORI (2014a) Privacy and personal data. Ipsos MORI, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Ipsos MORI (2014b) Personalization vs. privacy. Ipsos MORI, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Kostakis V, Giotitsas C (2014) The (a)political economy of Bitcoin. Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 12(2). http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/606/578Google Scholar
  14. Luther WJ (2013) Cryptocurrencies, network effects, and switching costs. Mercatus Center Working Paper 13–17. Retrieved from http://mercatus.org/publication/cryptocurrencies-network-effects-and-switching-costs
  15. Nakamoto S (2008) Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdfGoogle Scholar
  16. Olson P (2014) WhatsApp hits 600 million active users. http://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2014/08/25/whatsapp-hits-600-million-active-users-founder-says/Google Scholar
  17. Philippines Court of Justice (2012) Republic Act no. 10173 [Privacy Act invalidated ruling.] http://www.gov.ph/2012/08/15/republic-act-no-10173/Google Scholar
  18. Privacy International (2014) Metadata. https://www.privacyinternational.org/?q=node/53Google Scholar
  19. Schneier B (2013a) The public/private surveillance partnership. https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/08/the_publicpriva_1.htmlGoogle Scholar
  20. Schneier B (2013b) ‘Stalker economy’ here to stay. http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/20/opinion/schneier-stalker-economy/Google Scholar
  21. Sterner E (2014) The security vs. privacy debate is already over, and privacy lost. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/the-security-vs.-privacy-debate-is-already-over-and-privacy-lost/article/2545407Google Scholar
  22. Streitfeld D (2014) European court lets users erase records on the Web. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/14/technology/google-should-erase-web-links-to-some-personal-data-europes-highest-court-says.html?Google Scholar
  23. Tocqueville A (1992) De la democratie en Amérique. Les Éditions Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  24. Warmerdam E (2014) Lawsuit over Google’s data usage to proceed. http://www.courthousenews.com/2014/07/23/69762.htmGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations