The Future of the Internet as a Rhizomatic Revolution toward a Digital Meanings Society

  • Sirkka HeinonenEmail author
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 17)


In futures studies, various futures images are sketched and explored at three main levels: possible, probable, and preferred ones. This chapter is concerned with identifying and discussing possible images of the future of the Internet. The Internet is a very recent phenomenon in humankind’s history. However, its development is fast and may divert into directions beyond our present expectations. Therefore, it is of crucial importance to explore various futures images in order to evaluate and foresee the ones that are worth attaining through active plans and measures. The current evolution of the Internet seems to follow a rhizomatic model, where knowledge is not disseminated systematically or logically based on a hierarchical binary tree-model, but instead follows the organic way of rhizomes to grow in all directions, penetrating all available niches. This new model heralds a digital meanings society, where people using the Internet are empowered in their search for meaning in all activities and meaning becomes the main capital. Three possible scenarios of the future Internet are presented, which vary according to their probability and desirability.


Futures studies Internet Meanings society Digitalization Scenario 



This chapter contains some material drawing on the discussions with the following persons: Juho Ruotsalainen, Sofi Kurki, Markus Heinonen, and Marjukka Parkkinen. A few ideas from the Finnish reports written in the MEDEIA project ( as well as Neo-Carbon Energy project ( have also been included in this chapter.


  1. Ahlqvist T, Bäck A, Heinonen S, Halonen M (2008) Social media roadmaps: Exploring the futures triggered by social media. VTT Research Notes 2454. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. Retrieved from
  2. Amara R (1981) The futures field: searching for definitions and boundaries. The Futurist 15, 25–29 Feb 1981Google Scholar
  3. Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G (2010) The Internet of Things: a survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2787–2805CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell W (1997a) Foundations of futures studies: history, purpose, and knowledge. Transaction Publishers, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell W (1997b) Foundations of futures studies: values, objectivity, and the good society. Transaction Publishers, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  6. Botkin JW, Elmandjra M, Malitza M (1979) No limits to learning. Bridging the human gap. A report to the Club of Rome. Pergamon Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  7. Castells M (1996) The rise of the network society: the information age: economy, society and culture, vol 1. Blackwell Publishers, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Dator J, Seo Y (2004) Korea as the wave of a future: the emerging dream society of icons and aesthetic experience. J Future Stud 9(1):31–44Google Scholar
  9. Day GS, Schoemaker PJH (2006) Peripheral vision: detecting the weak signals that will make or break your company. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  10. Deleuze G, Guattari F (1987) A thousand plateaus (Massumi B, Trans). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, Original work published 1980Google Scholar
  11. Flechtheim O (1970) Futurologie: Der Kampf um die Zukunft. Wissenschaft und Politik, KölnGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibson W (1984) Neuromancer. Ace Books, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  13. Gordon E, Silva ADSE (2011) Net locality: why location matters in a networked world. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heinonen S (2013) Dance of the black swans. In: Finnish Parliament’s Committee for the Future (edn) Black swans: what will change the world next? Entries from the writing contest of the Committee for the Future of the Parliament of Finland. + 2013.pdfGoogle Scholar
  15. Heinonen S (Interviewer), Dator J (Interviewee) (2012) Interview of Jim Dator by Sirkka Heinonen on futures of Ubiquitous Dream Society and privacy [Interview video file].
  16. Heinonen S, Ruotsalainen J (2013) Futures clinique: method for promoting futures learning and provoking radical futures. Eur J Future Res 1(7):1–11Google Scholar
  17. Heylighen F, Bollen J (1996) The World-Wide Web as a super-brain: from metaphor to model. In: Trappl R (ed) Cybernetics and systems ’96.
  18. Jensen R (1999) Dream society: how the coming shift from information to imagination will transform your business. McGraw-Hill, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  19. Joy B (2000) Why the future doesn’t need us. Wired. Scholar
  20. Kenney M (2000) Understanding Silicon Valley: the anatomy of an entrepreneurial region. Stanford Business Books, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  21. Kurzweil R (2005) The singularity is near: when humans transcend biology. Viking Penguin, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  22. Malaska P, Holstius K (2009) Modern futures approach. Futura 28(1):85–96Google Scholar
  23. Malaska P, Masini E (eds) (2009) Philosophical essays of knowledge of the future, Futura 1. The Finnish Society for Futures Studies, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  24. Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW III (1972) The limits to growth: a report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  25. Perry Piscione D (2013) Secrets of Silicon Valley: what everyone else can learn from the innovation capital of the world. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  26. Rifkin J (2000) The age of access: the new culture of hypercapitalism, where all of life is a paid-for experience. Putnam Publishing Group, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  27. Rifkin J (2014) The zero marginal cost society. The Internet of Things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  28. Ruotsalainen J, Heinonen S (2015) Media ecology and the future ecosystemic society. Eur J Future Res 3(9):1–10Google Scholar
  29. Schwartz P (1998) The art of the long view: planning for the future in an uncertain world. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West SussexGoogle Scholar
  30. Taleb N (2007) The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Penguin Random House, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Taleb N (2012) Antifragile: things that gain from disorder. Penguin Random House, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Watson R (2012) 50 Ideas you really need to know the future. Quercus Editions Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Finland Futures Research Centre (FFRC)University of TurkuHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations