Advertisement

Liquid Democracy and the Futures of Governance

  • José RamosEmail author
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 17)

Abstract

World Wide Web technologies create fundamentally new potentials for social interaction and decision-making among diverse social actors. A new generation of Web technologies, accompanied by new political cultures, portends an ushering of radical transformations in democratic decision-making. This chapter asks three critical questions: (1) How do emerging Web technologies deepen democratic participation? (2) How do we avoid or transform scenarios where Web technologies are employed to maintain political-economic oligarchies of power? and (3) What new political cultures or political contracts may emerge through the convergence of Web technology and political engagement? This chapter uses the recent precedent of Liquid Democracy online decision-making experiments in Germany, to answer these questions and peer into the futures of governance. The study came to the following conclusions: (1) We are witnessing a shift from formal representative democracy to situational and fluid forms of governance; (2) Alongside this we are seeing a deepening of political participation, which may bring forth new political cultures and political contracts; and, (3) A number of possible scenarios emerge from the decline of formal representative democracy—A possible “Liquid Revolution” where online governance has transformed democracy; a “Steady-state Oligarchy” where pseudo-representative and oligarchic powers persist; a “Partner State” where representative and online variegated governance is blended; and a “War of the Worlds” where statist and variegated governance online systems aggressively compete for power.

Keywords

Liquid Democracy Lateral power Digital technology Political culture Political contract Governance futures 

References

  1. Albert M (2003) Parecon: life after capitalism. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauwens M (2012) Blueprint for a P2P society: the partner state & ethical economy. http://www.shareable.net/blog/blueprint-for-p2p-society-the-partner-state-ethical-economy
  3. Behrens J, Kistner A, Nitsche A, Swierczek B (2014) The principles of LiquidFeedback. Interaktive Demokratie e. V, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. Bollier D, Helfrich S (eds) (2014) The Wealth of the commons: a world beyond market and state. Levellers Press, Amherst, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Cavanagh J, Mander J (2003) Alternatives to economic globalisation. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  6. Dodgson CL (1884) The principles of parliamentary representation. Harrison and Sons, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Fukuyama F (1989) The end of history? The National Interest 1989:3–18Google Scholar
  8. Held D (2005) At the global crossroads: the end of the Washington Consensus and the rise of global social democracy? Globalizations 2(1):95–113CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Herman E, McChesney R (1997) The global media. Cassell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Hiltunen E (2008) The future sign and its three dimensions. Futures 40(3):247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hines C (2002) Localization: a global manifesto. Earthscan, OxfordshireGoogle Scholar
  12. Inayatullah S (2008) Six pillars: futures thinking for transforming. Foresight 10(1):4–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keane J (2005) Cosmocracy and global civil society. In: Chandler D, Baker G (eds) Global civil society: contested futures. Routledge, New York, pp 149–170Google Scholar
  14. Keane J (2009) The life and death of democracy. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Korten DC (1999) The post-corporate world: life after Capitalism. Kumarian Press, West Hartford, CTGoogle Scholar
  16. Molitor G (2010) Timeline 22-step model for tracking and forecasting public policy change. J Future Stud 14(3):1–12Google Scholar
  17. Orsi C (2009) Knowledge-based society, peer production and the common good. Capital Class 33(1):31–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ponniah T (2006) The World social forum vision: radical democracy vs. neoliberal globalisation. Doctoral dissertation, Clark UniversityGoogle Scholar
  20. Ramos J (2010) Alternative futures of globalisation: a socio-ecological study of the World Social Forum process. Department of Research and Commercialisation, Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  21. Ramos J (2013) The futures of power in the Network Era. J Future Stud 17(4):71–92Google Scholar
  22. Ramos J (2014a) Anticipatory governance: traditions and trajectories for strategic design. J Future Stud 19(1):35–52Google Scholar
  23. Ramos J (2014b) Liquid Democracy: the App that turns everyone into a politician. http://www.shareable.net/blog/liquid-democracy-the-app-that-turns-everyone-into-a-politicianGoogle Scholar
  24. Robinson W (2004) A theory of global capitalism. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  25. Sharp D (2011) City budgeting & Gov 2.0: a match made in heaven? http://www.shareable.net/blog/city-budgeting-gov-20-a-match-made-in-heavenGoogle Scholar
  26. Sklair L (2002) Globalisation: capitalism and its alternatives, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Wallerstein I (2004) New revolts against the system. In: Mertes T (ed) A movement of movements: is another world really possible? Verso, London, pp 262–274Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Grundversorgung 2.0 Project, Centre for Digital CulturesLeuphana UniversitätLüneburgGermany

Personalised recommendations