Robotic Urologic Surgery: How to Make an Effective Robotic Program

  • Firas AbdollahEmail author
  • Tarun Jindal
  • Craig Rogers


Robotic urology is here to stay and the its acceptability is increasing by each passing day. The hospitals are keen to initiate the program but as this is a huge undertaking and involves major financial investment along with the need for appropriate infrastructure and medical team. This chapter aims at guiding the institutions in identifying the thrust areas that need to be addressed to ensure the establishment of a successful robotic program.


Robotic surgery Urology Hospital Surgery 


  1. 1.
    Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology. 2002;60(5):864–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith JA Jr, Herrell SD. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: do minimally invasive approaches offer significant advantages? J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2005;23(32):8170–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Patel VR. Essential elements to the establishment and design of a successful robotic surgery programme. Int J Med Robot. 2006;2(1):28–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yu HY, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Kowalczyk KJ, Hu JC. Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol. 2012;187(4):1392–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):701–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tewari A, Kaul S, Menon M. Robotic radical prostatectomy: a minimally invasive therapy for prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep. 2005;6(1):45–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hemal AK, Menon M. Robotics in urology. Curr Opin Urol. 2004;14(2):89–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, Ho R, Cadeddu JA, Roehrborn CG, et al. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2010;57(3):453–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim SP, Shah ND, Karnes RJ, Weight CJ, Shippee ND, Han LC, et al. Hospitalization costs for radical prostatectomy attributable to robotic surgery. Eur Urol. 2013;64(1):11–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steinberg PL, Merguerian PA, Bihrle W 3rd, Seigne JD. The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology. 2008;72(5):1068–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burgess SV, Atug F, Castle EP, Davis R, Thomas R. Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2006;20(10):827–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alemozaffar M, Chang SL, Kacker R, Sun M, DeWolf WC, Wagner AA. Comparing costs of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2013;27(5):560–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hyams E, Pierorazio P, Mullins JK, Ward M, Allaf M. A comparative cost analysis of robot-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2012;26(7):843–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee R, Ng CK, Shariat SF, Borkina A, Guimento R, Brumit KF, et al. The economics of robotic cystectomy: cost comparison of open versus robotic cystectomy. BJU Int. 2011;108(11):1886–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leow JJ, Reese SW, Jiang W, Lipsitz SR, Bellmunt J, Trinh QD, et al. Propensity-matched comparison of morbidity and costs of open and robot-assisted radical cystectomies: a contemporary population-based analysis in the United States. Eur Urol. 2014;66(3):569–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abdollah F, Budaus L, Sun M, Morgan M, Johal R, Thuret R, et al. Impact of caseload on total hospital charges: a direct comparison between minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy—a population based study. J Urol. 2011;185(3):855–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Herron DM, Marohn M. A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(2):313–25. discussion 1-2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zorn KC, Gautam G, Shalhav AL, Clayman RV, Ahlering TE, Albala DM, et al. Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons. J Urol. 2009;182(3):1126–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu M, Curet M. A review of training research and virtual reality simulators for the da Vinci surgical system. Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(1):12–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wolanski P, Chabert C, Jones L, Mullavey T, Walsh S, Gianduzzo T. Preliminary results of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) after fellowship training and experience in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). BJU Int. 2012;110(Suppl 4):64–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sood A, Ghani KR, Ahlawat R, Modi P, Abaza R, Jeong W, et al. Application of the statistical process control method for prospective patient safety monitoring during the learning phase: robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia (IDEAL phase 2a-b). Eur Urol. 2014;66(2):371–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and EvaluationHenry Ford Hospital, Vattikuti Institute of UrologyDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations