Advertisement

Abstract

There are many reasons for performing a perinatal necropsy, foremost of which is identifying an accurate cause of death. Pathologists and administrators who fail to understand the importance and enormity of the problem of stillbirths and neonatal losses and the important role of the necropsy fail the many parents who suffer these losses. By doing so, it can also exclude some causes of death and identify disorders with implications for counseling for the family as well as for future pregnancies. The standard of perinatal necropsies is far superior when performed by pediatric pathologists to when histopathologists other than pediatric pathologists perform them, and this may necessitate the regionalization of perinatal services.

This chapter summarizes the equipment requirements and formalities for performing a necropsy. The necessary preliminary examinations and investigations prior to any dissection, such as mensuration to document growth, imaging, and photography, are discussed. A proposed method of dissection of the body is provided, and the reasons for sampling for histology, biochemistry, microbiology, and molecular studies are provided.

Keywords

Autopsy Necropsy Method Intrauterine growth Dysmorphology Cause of death 

References

  1. 1.
    Perinatal Mortality Special Interest Group of the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand. Clinical practice guideline for perinatal mortality audit. Brisbane: Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand; 2004.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rushton DI. West midlands perinatal mortality survey, 1987. An audit of 300 perinatal autopsies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;98:624–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Porter HJ, Keeling JW. Value of perinatal necropsy examination. J Clin Pathol. 1987;40:180–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saller DN, Lesser KB, Harrel U, Rogers BB, Oyer CE. The clinical utility of the perinatal autopsy. JAMA. 1995;273:663–5.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khong TY. A review of perinatal autopsy rates worldwide, 1960s to 1990s. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1996;10:97–105.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brodlie M, Laing IA, Keeling JW, McKenzie KJ. Ten years of neonatal autopsies in tertiary referral centre: retrospective study. BMJ. 2002;324:761–3.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Healthcare Improvement Scotland. Scottish perinatal and infant mortality and morbidity report 2011. Edinburgh; 2013. http://www.isdscotland.org/Health-Topics/Maternity-and-Births/Publications/2013-03-26/2013-03-26-SPIMMR2011-report.pdf.
  8. 8.
    Gould S. Are perinatal deaths adequately scrutinised? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011;96:F241–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Becher JC, Laing IA, Keeling JW, McIntosh N. Restoring high neonatal autopsy rates. Lancet. 2004;364:2019–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hickey L, Murphy A, Devaney D, Gillan J, Clarke T. The value of neonatal autopsy. Neonatology. 2012;101:68–73.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Pattinson R, Cousens S, Kumar R, Ibiebele I, et al. Stillbirths: where? When? Why? How to make the data count? Lancet. 2011;377:1448–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    International Agency for Research on Cancer. Globocan 2012: estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. WHO; 2014 [updated 29 Sept 2014]; Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_population.aspx.
  13. 13.
    Huisman TA. Magnetic resonance imaging: an alternative to autopsy in neonatal death? Semin Neonatol. 2004;9:347–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sebire NJ, Weber MA, Thayyil S, Mushtaq I, Taylor A, Chitty LS. Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic postmortem examination (“keyhole autopsy”): feasibility and initial experience. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:513–8.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cartlidge PH, Dawson AT, Stewart JH, Vujanic GM. Value and quality of perinatal and infant postmortem examinations: cohort analysis of 400 consecutive deaths. BMJ. 1995;310:155–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thornton CM, O’Hara MD. A regional audit of perinatal and infant autopsies in Northern Ireland. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:18–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vujanic GM, Cartlidge PH, Stewart JH. Improving the quality of perinatal and infant necropsy examinations: a follow up study. J Clin Pathol. 1998;51:850–3.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vujanic GM, Cartlidge PH, Stewart JH, Dawson AJ. Perinatal and infant postmortem examinations: how well are we doing? J Clin Pathol. 1995;48:998–1001.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sun CC, Revell VO, Belli AJ, Viscardi RM. Discrepancy in pathologic diagnosis of placental lesions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126:706–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    NHS England. 2013/14 Standard NHS contract for perinatal pathology. London; 2013.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ashley D, McCaw-Binns A, Golding J, Keeling J, Escoffery C, Coard K, et al. Perinatal mortality survey in Jamaica: aims and methodology. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1994;8:6–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Adappa R, Paranjothy S, Roberts Z, Cartlidge PH. Perinatal and infant autopsy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;92:F49–50.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kumar M, Singh A, Gupta U, Anand R, Thakur S. Relevance of labor room fetal autopsy in increasing its acceptance. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:1–6.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Langley FA. The perinatal postmortem examination. J Clin Pathol. 1971;24:159–69.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hall JG, Allanson JE, Gripp KW, Slavotinek AM. Handbook of physical measurements. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Valdes-Dapena M, Huff DS. Perinatal autopsy manual. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1983.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    Wigglesworth JS. Performance of the perinatal autopsy. In: Wigglesworth JS, editor. Perinatal pathology. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1984. p. 48–83.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chambers HM. The perinatal autopsy: a contemporary approach. Pathology. 1992;24:45–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wainwright HC. My approach to performing a perinatal or neonatal autopsy. J Clin Pathol. 2006;59:673–80.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Barson AJ. The perinatal postmortem. In: Barson AJ, editor. Laboratory investigation of fetal disease. Bristol: Wright; 1981. p. 476–97.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bove KE. Practice guidelines for autopsy pathology: the perinatal and pediatric autopsy. Autopsy Committee of the College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;121:368–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Royal College of Pathologists. Appendix 6: guidelines for autopsy investigation of fetal and perinatal death. London: Royal College of Pathologists; 2002.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gardosi J, Figueras F, Clausson B, Francis A. The customised growth potential: an international research tool to study the epidemiology of fetal growth. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011;25:2–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hutcheon JA, Zhang X, Platt RW, Cnattingius S, Kramer MS. The case against customised birthweight standards. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011;25:11–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Villar J, Cheikh Ismail L, Victora CG, Ohuma EO, Bertino E, Altman DG, et al. International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the newborn cross-sectional study of the intergrowth-21st project. Lancet. 2014;384:857–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Saugstad OD. New growth charts for newborn babies. Lancet. 2014;384:833–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    McCarthy EA, Walker SP. International fetal growth standards: one size fits all. Lancet. 2014;384:835–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Singer DB, Sung C-R, Wigglesworth JS. Fetal growth and maturation: with standards for body and organ development. In: Wigglesworth JS, Singer DB, editors. Textbook of fetal and perinatal pathology. 2nd ed. London: Blackwell Science; 1998. p. 8–40.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Figueras F, Torrents M, Munoz A, Comas C, Antolin E, Echevarria M, et al. References intervals for fetal biometrical parameters. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;105:25–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chambers HM, Knowles S, Staples A, Tamblyn M, Haan EA. Anthropometric measurements in the second trimester fetus. Early Hum Dev. 1993;33:45–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Conway DL, Hansen NI, Dudley DJ, Parker CB, Reddy UM, Silver RM, et al. An algorithm for the estimation of gestational age at the time of fetal death. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013;27:145–57.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Marton T, Hargitai B, Bowen C, Cox PM. Elevated brain weight/liver weight ratio in normal body weight centile term perinatal deaths: an indicator of terminal intrauterine malnourishment. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2013;16:267–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Charles AK, Khong TY. Stillbirth and intrauterine growth restriction. In: Cohen M, Scheimberg I, (eds). The Pediatric and Perinatal Autopsy Manual. Cambridge University Press, London, 2014.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kalifa G, Barbet JP, Labbe F, Houette A, Sellier N. Value of systemic post mortem radiographic examinations of fetuses – 400 cases. Pediatr Radiol. 1989;19:111–3.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kjaer I, Keeling JW, Graem N. The midline craniofacial skeleton in holoprosencephalic fetuses. J Med Genet. 1991;28:846–55.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    van der Harten HJ, Brons JT, Schipper NW, Dijkstra PF, Meijer CJ, van Geijn HP. The prenatal development of the normal human skeleton: a combined ultrasonographic and post-mortem radiographic study. Pediatr Radiol. 1990;21:52–6.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sherwood RJ, Meindl RS, Robinson HB, May RL. Fetal age: methods of estimation and effects of pathology. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000;113:305–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Stempflé N, Huten Y, Fondacci C, Lang T, Hassan M, Nessmann C. Fetal bone age revisited: proposal of a new radiographic score. Pediatr Radiol. 1995;25:551–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Foote GA, Wilson AJ, Stewart JH. Perinatal post-mortem radiography–experience with 2500 cases. Br J Radiol. 1978;51:351–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bourlière-Najean B, Russel AS, Panuel M, Piercecchi-Marti MD, Sigaudy S, Fredouille C, et al. Value of fetal skeletal radiographs in the diagnosis of fetal death. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1046–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Brookes JS, Hagmann C. MRI in fetal necropsy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24:1221–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Langer B, Choquet P, Ravier S, Gasser B, Schlaeder G, Constantinesco A. Low-field dedicated magnetic resonance imaging: a potential tool for assisting perinatal autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12:271–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Pauli RM, Reiser CA. Wisconsin stillbirth service program: Ii. Analysis of diagnoses and diagnostic categories in the first 1,000 referrals. Am J Med Genet. 1994;50:135–53.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gilbert-Barness E, Spicer DE, Steffensen TS. Handbook of pediatric autopsy pathology. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2013.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Archie JG, Collins JS, Lebel RR. Quantitative standards for fetal and neonatal autopsy. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;126:256–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Maroun LL, Graem N. Autopsy standards of body parameters and fresh organ weights in nonmacerated and macerated human fetuses. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2005;8:204–17.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Correa RR, Rocha LP, Petrini CG, Teixeira Vde P, Castro EC. Influence of cause of death on body and internal organs weight in perinatal autopsies. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Rev Federacao Bras Soc Ginecol Obstet. 2014;36:23–8.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Wigglesworth JS, Husemeyer RP. Intracranial birth trauma in vaginal breech delivery: the continued importance of injury to the occipital bone. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1977;84:684–91.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Chi JG, Dooling EC, Gilles FH. Gyral development of the human brain. Ann Neurol. 1977;1:86–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Isaacson G. Postmortem examination of infant brains. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1984;108:80–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kelehan P. Technique for removal of the newborn middle and inner ear. In: Wigglesworth JS, editor. Perinatal pathology. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1984. p. 431–3.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Muller J, McCombs RV. Brain-cutting device for correlation with CT-scan planes of section. Acta Neuropathol. 1984;62:257–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Laurence KM, Martin D. A technique for obtaining undistorted specimens of the central nervous system. J Clin Pathol. 1959;12:188–90.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Yates PO. Birth trauma to the vertebral arteries. Arch Dis Child. 1959;34:436–41.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Naeye RL. The investigation of perinatal deaths. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:611–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Rushton DI. Prognostic role of the perinatal postmortem. Br J Hosp Med. 1994;52:450–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Emery JL, Kalpaktsoglou PK. The costochondral junction during later stages of intrauterine life, and abnormal growth patterns found in association with perinatal death. Arch Dis Child. 1967;42:1–13.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Ernst LM, Ruchelli ED, Huff DS, editors. Color atlas of fetal and neonatal histology. New York: Springer; 2011.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Mueller RF, Sybert VP, Johnson J, Brown ZA, Chen WJ. Evaluation of a protocol for post-mortem examination of stillbirths. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:586–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Barson AJ. A postmortem study of infection in the newborn from 1976 to 1988. In: de Louvois J, Harvey D, editors. Infection in the newborn. Chichester: Wiley; 1990. p. 13–4.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Pryse-Davies J, Hurley R. Infections and perinatal mortality. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1979;5:59–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Kiviat NB, Watts DH, Eschenbach DA. Microbiologic causes and neonatal outcomes associated with chorioamnion infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:955–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Zaaijman JT, Wilkinson AR, Keeling JW, Mitchell RG, Turnbull AC. Spontaneous premature rupture of the membranes: bacteriology, histology and neonatal outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982;2:155–60.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Becher J-C, Ashworth M, Bell J, Bevan C, Dalton RN, Fitzpatrick D, et al. Guidelines for the investigation of newborn infants who suffer a sudden and unexpected postnatal collapse in the first week of life: recommendations from a professional group on sudden unexpected postnatal collapse. London: Wellchild; 2011.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Spencer MK, Khong TY. Conformity to guidelines for pathologic examination of the placenta. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127:205–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Curtin WM, Krauss S, Metlay LA, Katzman PJ. Pathologic examination of the placenta and observed practice. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:35–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Blanc WA. Pathology of the placenta, membranes and umbilical cord in bacterial, fungal and viral infections in man. In: Naeye RK, Kissane JM, Kaufman N, editors. Perinatal disease. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1981. p. 67–132.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Pinar H, Sung CJ, Oyer CE, Singer DB. Reference values for singleton and twin placental weights. Pediatr Pathol Lab Med. 1996;16:901–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Pinar H, Stephens M, Singer DB, Boyd TK, Pflueger SM, Gang DL, et al. Triplet placentas: reference values for weights. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2002;5:495–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Thompson JM, Irgens LM, Skjaerven R, Rasmussen S. Placenta weight percentile curves for singleton deliveries. BJOG. 2007;114:715–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Naeye RL. Umbilical cord length: clinical significance. J Pediatr. 1985;107:278–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    van Diik CC, Franx A, de Laat MW, Bruinse HW, Visser GH, Nikkels PG. The umbilical coiling index in normal pregnancy. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;11:280–3.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Khong TY. Evidence-based pathology: umbilical cord coiling. Pathology. 2010;42:618–22.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    de Laat MWM, van Alderen ED, Franx A, Visser GHA, Bots ML, Nikkels PGJ. The umbilical coiling index in complicated pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;130:66–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Machin GA, Ackerman J, Gilbert-Barness E. Abnormal umbilical cord coiling is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2000;3:462–71.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Boyd PA, Brown RA, Stewart WJ. Quantitative structural differences within the normal term human placenta: a pilot study. Placenta. 1980;1:337–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Anonymous. ACOG committee opinion no. 383: evaluation of stillbirths and neonatal deaths. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:963–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pathology, Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyUniversity of AdelaideNorth AdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Department of HistopathologyWomen’s & Children’s HospitalNorth AdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations