Advertisement

Adopting Social Media in the Local Level of Government: Towards a Public Administration 2.0?

  • J. Ignacio CriadoEmail author
  • Francisco Rojas-Martín
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 15)

Abstract

This chapter analyses the dynamics of adoption of social media in Spanish local governments with over 50,000 inhabitants. Specifically, the study seeks to respond to the following questions: (1) What are the key factors that explain the use of social media in public administrations? (2) What is the perception of those who manage social media regarding the level of development in their institution? (3) What are the key inhibitors for the development of these technologies in local administrations? This chapter is based on a questionnaire aimed at those in charge of social media in all Spanish local governments with over 50,000 inhabitants (146), which obtained a response rate above 97 % and presents the results through descriptive statistics relating to the defined indicators. The most significant conclusions are, on the one hand, that despite there being a high level of diffusion of these technologies at the level of local administrations, initial actions and strategies for their promotion have either not been clearly defined, or have been inadequately implemented. Second, we are at an early stage of development of social media in the local government sphere. Nonetheless, this is a field of widespread academic interest, bearing in mind the potential for innovation in management and in improved public administration interaction with citizens.

Keywords

Local Government Social Medium Public Administration Public Organisation User Guide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research has been funded by the grant CSO2013-48641-C2-1-R, Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, project: A new local architecture: efficiency, dimension, and democracy.

References

  1. Agostino, D. (2013). Using social media to engage citizens: A study of Italian municipalities. Public Relations Review, 39(3), 232–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, K. N., Medaglia, R., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2012). Social media in public health care: Impact domain propositions. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 462–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, C., & Singleton, R. (2010). National survey of social media use in state government. Lexington, KY: NASCIO.Google Scholar
  4. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonsón, E., Royo, S., & Ratkai, M. (2013). Analysis of European municipalities’ Facebook channels activity and citizens’ engagement. Retrieved August 16, 2014, from http://www.aeca.es/pub/on_line/comunicaciones_xviicongresoaeca/cd/84g.pdf.
  7. Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chun, S. A., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., & Hovy, E. (2010). Government 2.0. Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 15(1–2), 1–9.Google Scholar
  10. Chun, S. A., & Warner, J. (2010). Finding information in an era of abundance: Towards a collaborative tagging environment in government. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 15(1–2), 89–103.Google Scholar
  11. Criado, J. I., & Gil-García, J. R. (2013). Gobierno Electrónico, Gestión y Políticas Públicas. Gestión y Política Pública, 22, 3–48.Google Scholar
  12. Criado, J.I., & Rojas-Martin, F. (2012). Strategies and realities of social media diffusion in the public sector: Evidence from the regional government in Spain. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the European Group of Public Administration. Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
  13. Criado, J.I., & Rojas-Martin, F. (2013a). (Eds.). Las redes sociales digitales en la gestión y las políticas públicas. Avances y desafíos para un gobierno abierto. Barcelona: EAPC.Google Scholar
  14. Criado, J. I., & Rojas-Martín, F. (2013b). Social media and public administration in Spain: A comparative analysis of the regional level of government. In J. Gil-Garcia (Ed.), E-Government success around the world: Cases, empirical studies, and practical recommendations (pp. 276–298). IGI Global: Hershey, PA.Google Scholar
  15. Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazán, R., & Gil-García, R. (2013). Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 320–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Generalitat de Cataluña (2013). Guía de usos y estilo en las redes sociales de la Generalitat de Cataluña. Retrieved August 2014, from http://www.gencat.cat/web/meugencat/documents/guia_usos_xarxa_es.pdf.
  17. Dixon, B. E. (2010). Towards e-government 2.0: An assessment of where e-government 2.0 is and where it is headed. Public Administration & Management, 15(2), 418–454.Google Scholar
  18. Ellison, N., & Hardey, M. (2014). Social media and local government: Citizenship, consumption and democracy. Local Government Studies, 40(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elogia (2014). V Estudio Anual sobre Redes Sociales IAB. Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  20. Gil-García, J. R. (2012). Enacting electronic government success: An integrative study of government-wide websites, organizational capabilities, and institutions. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Graells i Costa, J., & Ramilo Araujo, M. (2013). Ciudadanía y administraciones en red: la Administración Pública ante la nueva sociedad en red. Oleiros: Netbiblo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Han, B.-C. (2013). La Sociedad de las transparencia. Barcelona: Herder.Google Scholar
  23. Heidinger, C., Buchmann, E., & Böhn, K. (2010). Impact assessment in public policy: Towards a web 2.0 application. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 15(1–2), 33–50.Google Scholar
  24. Hrdinová, J., Helbig, N., & Peters, C. S. (2010). Designing social media policy for government: Eight essential elements, Albany: The Research foundation of State University of New York. Retrieved August 16, 2014, from http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications.
  25. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mainka, A., Hartmann, S., Stock, W. G., & Peters, I. (2014). Government and social media: A case study of 31 informational world cities. In R. H. Sprague (Ed.), Proceeding of the 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 1715–1724). Waikoloa: CPS.Google Scholar
  28. Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2010). Alignment 2.0: Strategic use of new internet technologies in government. Government Information Quarterly, 27(2), 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mergel, I. (2012). The social media innovation challenge in the public sector. Information Polity, 17(3–4), 281–292.Google Scholar
  30. Mergel, I. (2013). Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal government. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mossberger, K., Wu, Y., & Crawford, J. (2013). Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nam, T. (2012). Dual effects of the internet on political activism: Reinforcing and mobilizing. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sáez-Martín, A., Haro-de-Rosario, A., & Caba-Perez, C. (2014). A vision of social media in the Spanish Smartest Cities. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(4), 521–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sharif, M. H. M., Troshani, I., & Davidson, R. (2014). Adoption of social media services: The case of local government organizations in Australia. In Z. Sun & J. Yearwood (Eds.), Handbook of research on demand-driven web services: Theory, technologies, and applications (pp. 207–308). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  35. Urueña (2011). Las Redes Sociales en Internet. Madrid:ONTSI. Retrieved August 14, 2014, from http://www.ontsi.red.es/ontsi/es/estudios-informes.
  36. Urueña, A. (2013). La Sociedad en Red. Informe Anual 2013. Madrid:ONTSI. Retrieved August 14, 2014, from http://www.ontsi.red.es/ontsi/es/estudios-informes.
  37. Vallés, J. M., & Brugué, Q. (2001). El gobierno local. In M. Alcántara & A. Martínez (Eds.), Política y Gobierno en España (pp. 267–302). Valencia: Tirant lo blanch.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science and International RelationsUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations