Advertisement

Social Media Use in Crisis Communication Management: An Opportunity for Local Communities?

  • Rocio Zamora MedinaEmail author
  • Jose Carlos Losada Diaz
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 15)

Abstract

Social media has changed the way public administrations face their strategic communications, to the point that social media networks are considered even more effective tools for managing a risk or a crisis than traditional media. This chapter reflects on the opportunity Twitter presents for local governments facing critical scenarios, according to the main principles of the theory of Crisis Communication Management. A qualitative analysis from this perspective of how the Madrid city government faced the Madrid Arena tragedy lets us learn from the city government’s main mistakes, allowing us to think about the opportunity that social media presents local communities.

Keywords

Social Medium Crisis Management Traditional Medium Crisis Situation Twitter Account 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bonson, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., & Benevenutoz, F. (2010). Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. In Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 10–17). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chun, S., Shulman, S., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Hovy, E. (2010). Government 2.0: Marking connections between citizens, data and government. Information Policy, 15, 1–9.Google Scholar
  5. Coombs, T. (2013). Crisis and crisis management en encyclopedia of public relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Cromer, C. (2010). Understanding web 2.0’s influences on public e-services: A protection motivation perspective. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 12, 192–205.Google Scholar
  7. Currye, D. (2010). Expert round table on social media and risk communication during times of crisis: Strategic challenges and opportunities. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association (APHA).Google Scholar
  8. Freberg, K. (2012). Intention to comply with crisis messages communicated via social media. Public Relations Review, 38(2012), 416–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gonzalez-Herrero, A., & Smith, S. (2010). Crisis communications management 2.0: Organizational principles to manage crisis in an online world. Organizational Development Journal, 28(1), 97–105.Google Scholar
  10. Hughes, A. L., & Palen, L. (2010). Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events. International Journal of Emergency Management, 6(3–4), 248–260.Google Scholar
  11. Jin, Y., & Liu, B. F. (2010). The blog-mediated crisis communication model: Recommendations for responding to influential external blogs. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22(4), 429–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Keller, S. (2011). Adaptivity in risk communication. Studies in Communication Sciences, 11(1), 85–103.Google Scholar
  13. Kim, S., & Liu, B. F. (2012). Are all crisis opportunities? A comparison of how corporate and government organizations responded to the 2009 flu pandemic. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(1), 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lathrop, D., & Ruma, L. (2010). Open government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.Google Scholar
  15. Lerbinger, O. (1997). The crisis manager facing risk and responsibility. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. O’Leary, M. (Ed.). (2004). The first 72 hours: A community approach to disaster preparedness. New York: iUniverse.Google Scholar
  17. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatime Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 266–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Parmelee, J. H., & Bichard, S. L. (2012). Politics and the Twitter revolution: How tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  20. Ray, S. J. (1999). Strategic communication in crisis management lessons from the airline industry. Westport, CT: Quorum.Google Scholar
  21. Reynolds, B., & Seeger, M. (2005). Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. Journal of Health Communication, 10(1), 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sandman, P. M. (2006). Crisis communication best practices: Some quibbles and additions. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schultz, F., Utz, S., & Göritz, A. (2011). Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via twitter, blogs and traditional media. Public Relations Review, 37, 20–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Segerberg, A., & Bennett, W. L. (2011). Social media and the organization of collective action: Using Twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests. The Communication Review, 14(3), 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith, B. G. (2010). Socially distributing public relations: Twitter, Haiti, and interactivity in social media. Public Relations Review, 36, 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stephens, K. K., Malone, P. C., & Bailey, C. M. (2005). Communicating with stakeholders during a crisis: Evaluating message strategies. Journal of Business Communication, 42(4), 390–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Syme, C. (2011). Using social media in crisis: A study from Penn State [Blog]. Retrieved from http://cksyme.org/penn-state-social-media-in-crisis
  28. Ulmer, R., & Sellnow, T. L. (2000). Consistent question of ambiguity in organization crisis communication: Jack-in-the-Box as a case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Utz, S., Schultz, F., & Glocka, S. (2013). Crisis communication online: How medium, crisis type and emotions affected public reactions in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. Public Relations Review, 39, 40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Van der Meer, T., & Verhoeven, P. (2013). Public framing organizational crisis situations: Social media versus news media. Public Relations Review, 39, 229–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Veil, S. R., Buehner, T., & Palenchar, M. J. (2011). A work-in-process literature review: Incorporating social media in risk and crisis communication. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 19(2), 110–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weller, K., Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Mahrt, M., & Puschmann, C. (Eds.). (2014). Twitter and society. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  33. Wendling, C., Radisch, J. & Jacobzone, S. (2013). The use of social media in risk and crisis communication (OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 25). Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/5k3v01fskp9s-en
  34. Zerfass, A., Tench, R., Verčič, D., Verhoeven, P., & Moreno, A. (2013). European communication monitor 2013. Retrieved from http://www.zerfass.de/ecm/ECM2013-Results-ChartVersion.pdf
  35. Zerfass, A., Tench, R., Verčič, D., Verhoeven, P., & Moreno, A. (2014). European communication monitor 2014. Retrieved from http://www.zerfass.de/ecm/ECM-2014-Results-ChartVersion.pdf
  36. Zhang, W., Johnson, T. J., & Seltzer, T. (2010). The revolution will be networked: The influence of social networking sites on political attitudes and behavior. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhao, D., & Rosson, M. B. (2009). How and why people Twitter: The role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009, International Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 243–252). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rocio Zamora Medina
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jose Carlos Losada Diaz
    • 1
  1. 1.Facultad de Comunicación y DocumentaciónUniversidad de MurciaMurciaSpain

Personalised recommendations