Advertisement

Social Media and Local Governments: An Overview

  • Mehmet Zahid SobaciEmail author
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 15)

Abstract

Today, social media provide public institutions with new channels for rapidly spreading information, transparency, self-promotion to improve their image in the public eye, methods for designing and delivering public services with citizens. Taking advantage of the opportunities offered by social media is not limited to central government. Local governments deploy Internet-based innovative technologies that complement traditional methods in implementing different functions. However, social media tools provide opportunities as well as risk and challenges for local governments. In this context, aim of this chapter is to provide an overall evaluation of the relationship between local governments and social media.

Keywords

Local Government Social Medium Public Service Corporate Social Responsibility Activity Local Official 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Agostino, D. (2013). Using social media to engage citizens: A study of Italian municipalities. Public Relations Review, 39, 232–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avery, E. J., & Graham, M. W. (2013). Political public relations and the promotion of participatory, transparent government through social media. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 7(4), 274–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ben-Yehuda, G. (2012, Fall/Winter). Road hazards: Recognizing the risks of social media. The Business of Government Magazine, 68–70.Google Scholar
  5. Berman, E. M. (1997). Dealing with cynical citizens. Public Administration Review, 57(2), 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., Munson, S., & Glaisyer, T. (2010). Social media technology and government transparency. Computer, 43(11), 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonsón, E., Royo, S., & Ratkai, M. (2013). Analysis of European municipalities’ Facebook channels activity and citizens’ engagement. In XVII Congreso AECA ‘Ética y emprendimiento: valores para un nuevo desarrollo’, Pamplona, Spain. Retrieved from http://www.aeca1.org/pub/on_line/comunicaciones_xviicongresoaeca/cd/84g.pdf
  9. Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2006). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services. Public Management Review, 8(4), 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cassia, F., & Magno, F. (2009). Public services co-production: Exploring the role of citizen orientation. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 1(3), 334–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Center for Technology in Government. (2009). Exploratory social media project: Phase I—Identifying benefits and concerns surrounding use of social media in government. Retrieved from http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/reports/social_media/social_media.pdf
  14. Chang, A., & Kannan, P. K. (2008). Leveraging web 2.0 in government (E-Government/technology series). Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.Google Scholar
  15. Chu, H., & Xu, C. (2009). Web 2.0 and its dimensions in the scholarly world. Scientometrics, 80(3), 717–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chun, A. S., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., & Hovy, E. (2010). Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity, 15, 1–9.Google Scholar
  17. CIO Council. (2009). Guidelines for secure use of social media by federal departments and agencies. Retrieved from https://cio.gov/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/09/Guidelines_for_Secure_Use_Social_Media_v01-0.pdf
  18. Coleman, S., & Gøtze, J. (2001). Bowling together: Online public engagement in policy deliberation. London: Hansard Society.Google Scholar
  19. Commonwealth Secretariat. (2010). The global financial crisis and local government. Commonwealth Secretariat, Discussion Paper No. 9.Google Scholar
  20. Council of European Municipalities and Regions. (2009). The economic and financial crisis: The impact on local and regional authorities. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  21. Criado, J. I., & Martinez-Fuentes, G. (2010). Mayors’ usage of blogs in local election campaign: The Spanish case study. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 3(4), 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Criado, J. I., Martinez-Fuentes, G., & Silvan, A. (2012). Social media for political campaigning: The use of Twitter by Spanish mayors in 2011 local elections. In C. G. Reddick & S. K. Aikins (Eds.), Web 2.0 technologies and democratic governance (pp. 219–232). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2013). Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 319–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dadashzadeh, M. (2010). Social media in government: From eGovernment to eGovernance. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 8(11), 81–86.Google Scholar
  25. Effing, R., Van Hillegersberg, J., & Huibers, T. W. C. (2013). Social media participation and local politics: A case study of the Enschede council in the Netherlands. In M. A. Wimmer, E. Tambouris, & A. Macintosh (Eds.), Electronic participation (pp. 57–68). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ellison, N., & Hardey, M. (2013). Developing political conversations? Social media and English local authorities. Information, Communication & Society, 16(6), 878–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ellison, N. R., & Hardey, M. (2014). Social media and local government: Citizenship, consumption and democracy. Local Government Studies, 40(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Evans-Cowley, J. (2010). Planning in the age of Facebook: The role of social networking in planning processes. GeoJournal, 75(5), 407–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Evans-Cowley, J., & Hollander, J. (2010). The new generation of public participation: Internet-based participation tools. Planning Practice & Research, 25(3), 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Facebook. (2014). Retrieved from http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/
  31. Fredericks, J., & Foth, M. (2013). Augmenting public participation: Enhancing planning outcomes through the use of social media and web 2.0. Australian Planner, 50(3), 244–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Freeman, R. J., & Loo, P. (2009). Web 2.0 and e-government at the municipal level. Paper presented at 2009 World Congress on Privacy, Security, Trust and the Management of e-Business, August 25–27, 2009, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 70–78.Google Scholar
  33. Gibson, A. (2010). Local by social: How local authorities can use social media to achieve more for less. London: IDeA.Google Scholar
  34. Graham, M., & Avery, J. E. (2013). Public relations and social media: An analysis of the perceptions and trends of social media use at the local government level. Public Relations Journal, 7(4), 1–21.Google Scholar
  35. Hennessy, K. S. (2012, February). Are city governments and social media a good match? Quality Cities Magazine, 16–19.Google Scholar
  36. Hofmann, S., Beverungen, D., Räckers, M., & Becker, J. (2013). What makes local governments’ online communications successful? Insights from a multi-method analysis of Facebook. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 387–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Howard, A. (2012). Connecting with communities: How local government is using social media to engage with citizens. Sydney, New South Wales: ANZSOG Institute for Governance at the University of Canberra and Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government.Google Scholar
  38. Hrdinová, J., Helbig, N., & Stollar Peters, C. (2010). Designing social media policy for government: Eight essential elements. New York: Center for Technology in Government.Google Scholar
  39. IDeA. (2010). Connected councillors: A guide to using social media to support local leadership. London: Author.Google Scholar
  40. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kingsley, C. (2009). Making the most of social media: 7 lessons from successful cities. Fels Institute of Government. Retrieved from http://www.fels.upenn.edu/sites/www.fels.upenn.edu/files/PP3_SocialMedia.pdf
  42. Kuzma, J. (2010). Asian government usage of web 2.0 social media. European Journal of ePractice, 9, 69–81.Google Scholar
  43. Landsbergen, D. (2010). Government as part of the revolution: Using social media to achieve public goals. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 8(2), 135–147.Google Scholar
  44. Larsson, A. (2013). Bringing it all back home? Social media practices by Swedish municipalities. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 681–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lev-On, A. (2012). YouTube usage in low-visibility political campaigns. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9(2), 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Local Government and Public Service Initiative. (2009). The impact of the economic downturn on local government: What is happening and what can be done about it? Report by OSI/LGI to the Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  47. Lovari, A., & Parisi, L. (2012). Public administrations and citizens 2.0: Exploring digital public communication strategies and civic interaction within Italian municipality pages on Facebook. In F. Comunello (Ed.), Networked sociability and individualism: Technology for personal and professional relationships (pp. 238–263). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ma, L. (2014). Diffusion and assimilation of government microblogging: Evidence from Chinese cities. Public Management Review, 16(2), 274–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mainka, A., Hartmann, S., Stock, W. G., & Peters, I. (2014). Government and social media: A case study of 31 informational world cities. In R. H. Sprague (Ed.), Proceeding of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1715–1724), Waikoloa, HI: CPS.Google Scholar
  50. Mambrey, P., & Dörr, R. (2011). Local government and social networking technologies in Germany: The example of Twitter. In P. Parycek, M. J. Kripp, & N. Edelmann (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference for e-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM11) (pp. 249–259). Krems an der Donau, Austria: Edition Donau-Universitat Krems.Google Scholar
  51. Mayfield, A. (2007). What is social media. Retrieved from http://www.iCrossing.com/ebooks
  52. Meijer, A., Koops, B., Pieterson, W., Overman, S., & ten Tije, S. (2012). Government 2.0: Key challenges to its realization. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 10(1), 59–69.Google Scholar
  53. Mergel, I. (2013a). Social media in public sector: A guide to participation, collaboration and transparency in networked world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  54. Mergel, I. (2013b). A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Mossberger, K., Wu, Y., & Crawford, J. (2013). Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mundy, D., & Umer, Q. (2012). United Kingdom Local Authority Challenges in the use of Twitter and other social media. In SOTICS 2012: The Second International Conference on Social Eco-Informatics, October 21–26, 2012, Venice, Italy.Google Scholar
  58. O’Reilly, T. (2007). What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & Strategies, 65(1), 17–37.Google Scholar
  59. OECD. (2009). Focus on citizens: Public engagement for better policy and services. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. OECD. (2011). Together for better public services: Partnering with citizens and civil society (OECD public governance reviews). Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Oliveira, G. H. M., & Welch, E. W. (2013). Social media use in local government: Linkage of technology, task, and organizational context. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 397–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Omar, K., Scheepers, H., & Stockdale, R. (2012). Adoption of social media in Victorian local governments. In 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems, December 3–5, 2012, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
  63. Osborne, S. P. (2006). Editorial: New public governance. Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Osimo, D. (2008). Web 2.0 in government: Why and how? Luxembourg: European Communities.Google Scholar
  65. Oxley, A. (2011). A best practices guide for mitigating risk in the use of social media. Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government.Google Scholar
  66. Ozdesim Ikiz, O., Sobaci, M. Z., Yavuz, N., & Karkin, N. (2014). Political use of Twitter: The case of metropolitan mayor candidates in 2014 local elections in Turkey. In ICEGOV 2014, October 27–30, 2014, Guimaraes, Portugal.Google Scholar
  67. Panagiotopoulos, P., Bigdeli, A. Z., & Sams, S. (2014). Citizen–government collaboration on social media: The case of Twitter in the 2011 riots in England. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Panagiotopoulos, P., & Sams, S. (2011). Twitter in local government: A study of Greater London Authorities. In 2011 Pre-ICIS Workshop: Open Innovation in eGovernment, Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
  69. Panagiotopoulos, P., & Sams, S. (2012). An overview study of Twitter in the UK local government. In Transforming Government Workshop, May 8–9, 2012, Brunel University, London.Google Scholar
  70. Paulais, T. (2009). Local governments and the financial crisis: An analysis. Washington, DC: Cities Alliance.Google Scholar
  71. Picazo-Vela, S., Gutiérrez-Martínez, I., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2012). Understanding risks, benefits, and strategic alternatives of social media applications in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 504–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Purser, K. (2012). Using social media in local government: 2011 survey report. Sydney, New South Wales: Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government, University of Technology.Google Scholar
  73. Putnam, R. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Raynauld, V., & Greenberg, J. (2014). Tweet, click, vote: Twitter and the 2010 Ottawa municipal election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(4), 412–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Reddick, C. G., & Norris, D. F. (2013). Social media adoption at the American grass roots: Web 2.0 or 1.5? Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 498–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rustad, E., & Sæbø, Ø. (2013). How, why and with whom do local politicians engage on Facebook? In M. A. Wimmer, E. Tambouris, & A. Macintosh (Eds.), Electronic participation (pp. 69–79). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schellong, A., & Girrger, P. (2010). Government 2.0 in betaphase—An analysis of eparticipation and web 2.0 applications of Germany’s 50 largest cities and 16 federal states (Policy paper series). Wiesbaden, Germany: CSC.Google Scholar
  78. Scullion, J. (2013). Old rules for new technologies: Institutional responses to social media use by local councilors. Paper presented at European Consortium for Political Research Conference, September 4–7, 2013, Bordeaux, France.Google Scholar
  79. Segaard, S. B. (2012). Local election campaign on social media—Horizontal or vertical conversation? In ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, April 10–15, 2012, Antwerp, Belgium.Google Scholar
  80. Segaard, S. B., & Nielsen, J. A. (2013). Local election blogs: Networking among the political elite. Information Polity, 18(4), 299–313.Google Scholar
  81. Sharif, M. H. M., Troshani, I., & Davidson, R. (2014). Adoption of social media services: The case of local government. In Z. Sun & J. Yearwood (Eds.), Handbook of research on demand-driven web services: Theory, technologies, and applications (pp. 287–303). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Skogerbø, E., & Krumsvik, A. H. (2014). Newspapers, Facebook and Twitter: Intermedial agenda setting in local election campaigns. Journalism Practice, 1–17.Google Scholar
  83. Sobaci, M. Z., & Karkin, N. (2013). The use of twitter by mayors in Turkey: Tweets for better public services? Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 417–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Spurrell, D. (2012). An opportunity or a threat? How local government uses social media today. The Guardian. Retrieved February 7th Tuesday, 2012, from http://www.theguardian.com/local-government-network/2012/feb/07/local-government-social-media-today
  85. Tappendorf, J. A. (2012). Social media. In IMLA 2012 Annual Conference, October 21–24, 2012, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  86. Tyshchuk, Y., & Wallace, W. (2013). The use of social media by local government in response to an extreme event: Del Norte County, CA response to the 2011 Japan Tsunami. In T. Comes, F. Fiedrich, S. Fortier, J. Geldermann, & T. Müller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International ISCRAM Conference (pp. 802–811), Baden, Germany.Google Scholar
  87. United Cities and Local Governments. (2009). The impact of the global crisis on local governments, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  88. Vaccari, C. (2013). City hall 2.0? Italian local executive officials’ presence and popularity on web 2.0 platforms. In P. Nixon, R. Rawal, & D. Mercea (Eds.), Politics and the Internet in comparative context: Views from the cloud (pp. 169–185). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  89. Williamson, W., & Parolin, B. (2013). Web 2.0 and social media growth in planning practice: A longitudinal study. Planning, Practice & Research, 28(5), 544–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Yannas, P., Kleftodimos, A., & Lappas, G. (2011). Online political marketing in 2010 Greek local elections: The shift from web to web 2.0 campaigns. In G. Panigyrakis, P. Theodoridis, & A. Panopoulos (Eds.), Proceeding of the 16th International Conference on Corporate and Marketing Communications (pp. 38–50), Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
  91. Young Foundation. (2010). A social media framework for local government: A local 2.0 think-piece. London: Author.Google Scholar
  92. Zavattaro, S. M., & Sementelli, A. J. (2014). A critical examination of social media adoption in government: Introducing omnipresence. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Zheng, L. (2013). Social media in Chinese government: Drivers, challenges and capabilities. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative SciencesUludağ UniversityNiluferTurkey

Personalised recommendations