Advertisement

Smart City Implementation Framework for Developing Countries: The Case of Egypt

  • Karim HamzaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 11)

Abstract

Current smart city frameworks and models are not enough to fulfill the requirements of developing countries in order to face their challenges in applying the smart city concept due to weak integration of social, economic, and political needs, and lack of a holistic and integrated approach to sustainable city development. In addition, most of the developing countries lack the proper means for implementation, proper infrastructures, enough funding, sufficient economic growth, and political stability. Moreover, the challenges that can prevent the success of such a concept are poverty, inequality, cultural barriers, and the continual rise of slums and unplanned immigration from rural areas to cities.

This chapter recommends a “strategic implementation framework for smart city” tailored for developing countries such as Egypt. This general framework aims to assist different successive governments in countries such as Egypt to develop and maintain smart city strategies that help sustainable development of the country instead of building separate isolated cities that cannot face different political, economic, social, and environmental challenges.

Keywords

Smart city Developing countries Egypt Government Urban planning Sustainability framework Technology 

References

  1. Boulton, A., Brunn, S., & Devriendt, L. (2011). Cyberinfrastructures and “smart” world cities. In P. Taylor, B. Derudder, M. Hoyler, & F. Witlox, International handbook of globalization and world. UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  2. Central Agency for Public Mobilization And Statistics. (2014). Egyptian population report 2013. Cairo: Central Agency for Public Mobilization And Statistics.Google Scholar
  3. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., et al. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Hawaii.Google Scholar
  4. Dirks, S., Keeling, M., & Dencik, J. (2009). How smart is your city?: Helping cities measure progress. (IBM Global Business Services). ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/gbe03248usen/GBE03248USEN.PDF. Accessed 1 Jan 2014.
  5. Dirks, S., Gurdgiev, C., & Keeling, M. (2010). Smarter cities for smarter growth: How cities can optimize their systems for the talent-based economy. IBM Global Business Services. ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/gbe03348usen/GBE03348USEN.PDF.
  6. Falconer, G., & Mitchell, S. (2012). Smart city framework a systematic process for enabling smart + connected communities. Cisco Internet Business Solutions Group (IBSG). https://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac79/.../Smart-City-Framework.pdf. Accessed 1 Jan 2014.
  7. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanović, N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna: Centre of Regional Science (SRF), Vienna University of Technology.Google Scholar
  8. Harrison, C., & Donnelly, I. (2011). A theory of smart cities. 55th Annual meeting of the international society for the systems sciences. New York: IBM Corporation.Google Scholar
  9. Hollands, R. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? City, 12(3), 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). (2008). Strategic development master plan for sustainable development of the greater Cairo region. Cairo: Japan International Cooperation Agency.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, B. (2008). Cities, systems of innovation and economic development. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 10(2–3), 146–155.Google Scholar
  12. Kim, J., & Steenkamp, A. (2013). Analysis of smart city models and the four-foci taxonomy for smart city design. Architectural research conference—Urbanism: Technology, connectedness and the urban environment (pp. 638–649). Southfield: Lawrence Technological University.Google Scholar
  13. Natural Resources Defense Council. (2014, October 11). Sustainable Communities. Natural Resources Defense Council. http://www.nrdc.org/sustainable-communities/. Accessed 1 Sept 2014.
  14. Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. State Information Services. (2014). State information services Tourism importance. State information services. http://www.sis.gov.eg/En/Templates/Articles/tmpArticles.aspx?ArtID=67693. Accessed 6 March 2014.
  16. Toppeta, D. (2010). The smart city vision: How innovation and ICT can build smart, “Livable”, sustainable cities. (The Innovation Knowledge). http://www.thinkinnovation.org/file/research/23/en/Toppeta_Report_005_2010.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2014.
  17. UNdata. (2012). UNdata | country profile | Egypt. http://data.un.org/CountryProfile.aspx?crName=EGYPT. Accessed 8 Jan 2014.
  18. UN-HABITAT. (1998). Strategic urban development planning in Lake Victoria region: Lessons of experience. Toronto: International Council for Local Environmental Initiative (ICLEI).Google Scholar
  19. United Nations Population Fund. (2009). UNFPA Annual Report 2008. United Nations Population Fund. http://www.unfpa.org/publications/unfpa-annual-report-2008. Accessed 1 Oct 2014.
  20. United Nation Development Program. (2007). Strategic urban development plan for greater Cairo. Cairo: UNDP.Google Scholar
  21. United Nations. (2012). World population prospects: The 2012 revision. http://esa.un.org/wpp/unpp/panel_indicators.htm. Accessed 1 Dec 2013.
  22. World Bank. (2010). Egypt—Cairo traffic congestion study—phase 1. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for European Studies (IES)Vrije Universiteit BrusselCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations