Advertisement

Smart City Governance: A Local Emergent Perspective

  • Albert MeijerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 11)

Abstract

This chapter presents a local emergent perspective on smart city governance. Smart city governance is about using new technologies to develop innovative governance arrangements. Cities all around the world are struggling to find smart solutions to wicked problems and they hope to learn from successful techno-governance practices in other cities. Learning about successes of smart city governance is important but lessons need to be contextualized: approaches that work in one city may fail in another one. This chapter presents the local cooperative knowledge potential and the nature of the problem domain as key contextual factors and develops a model for studying and assessing smart city governance in context.

Keywords

Smart cities Contextual approach Multidimensional evaluation framework 

References

  1. Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alford, J. (2009). Engaging public sector clients. From service-delivery to co-production. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber, B. (2013). If mayors ruled the world: Dysfunctional nations, rising cities. New York: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Caragliu, A., & Del Bo, C. (2012). Smartness and European urban performance: Assessing the local impacts of smart urban attributes. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 97–113.Google Scholar
  5. Driessen, P. P. J., Dieperink, C., Laerhoven, F., Runhaar, H. A., & Vermeulen, W. J. (2012). Towards a conceptual framework for the study of shifts in modes of environmental governance—experiences from the Netherlands. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(3), 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (Eds.). (1997). Universities in the global economy: A Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. London: Cassell Academic.Google Scholar
  7. Florida, R. L. (2002). The rise of the creative class and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
  8. Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state. Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2012). Enacting electronic government success: An integrative study of government-wide websites, organizational capabilities, and institutions. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoh, B., Gruteser, M., Herring, R., Ban, J., Work, D., Herrera, J. C., Bayen, M., Annavaram, M., & Jacobson, Q. (2008). Virtual trip lines for distributed privacy-preserving traffic monitoring. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services (pp. 15–28). ACM.Google Scholar
  12. Hoon Lee, J. H., Phaal, R., & Lee, S.-H. (2013). An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2), 286–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Inayatullah, S. (2011). City futures in transformation: Emerging issues and case studies. Futures, 43(7), 654–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koppenjan, J., & Klijn, E. H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision-making. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Kuk, G., & Janssen, M. (2011). The business models and information architectures of smart cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Landry, C. (2006). The art of city making. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Lathrop, D., & Ruma, L. (2010). Open government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice. Beijing: O’Reilly.Google Scholar
  18. Lazariou, G., & Roscia, M. (2012). Definition methodology of the smart cities model. Energy, 47(1), 326–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leydesdorff, L., & Deakin, M. (2011). The triple-helix model of smart cities: A neo-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Light, P. C. (2008). The search for social entrepreneurship. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  21. Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lyon, D. (2001). Surveillance society. Monitoring everyday life. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data. A revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  24. Meijer, A. J. (2009). Complex responsibilities. An empirical analysis of responsibilities and technological complexity in Dutch immigration policies. Public Management Review, 11(6), 771–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meijer, A. J., & Thaens, M. (2013). Social media strategies: Understanding the differences between North American police departments. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 343–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meijer, A. J., Bannister, F., & Thaens, M. (Eds.). (2013). ICT, public administration and democracy in the coming decade. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  27. Michels, A., & Meijer, A. (2008). Safeguarding public accountability in horizontal government. Public Management Review, 10(2), 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nijkamp, P., & Kourtit, K. (2013). The “New Urban Europe”: Global challenges and local responses in the urban century. European Planning Studies, 21(3), 291–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3, 398–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pierre, J. (1999). Models of urban governance the institutional dimension of urban politics. Urban Affairs Review, 34(3), 372–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pierre, J. (2011). The politics of urban governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61, 414–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Radaelli, C., & De Francesco, F. (2010). Regulatory impact assessment. In M. Cave, R. Baldwin, & M. Lodge (Eds.), Oxford handbook of regulation (pp. 279–301). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., & Oliveira, A. (2011). Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In J. Domingue, A. Galis, A. Gavras, T. Zahariadis, & D. Lambert (Eds.), The future internet (pp. 431–446). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schulz, M., van der Steen, M., & van Twist, M. (2013). De koopman als dominee. Sociaal ondernemerschap in het publieke domein. Den Haag: Boom Lemma.Google Scholar
  37. Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stone, C. N. (1993). Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walravens, N. (2012). Mobile business and the smart city: Developing a business model framework to include public design parameters for mobile city services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3), 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Washburn, D., Sindhu, U., Balaouras, S., Dines, R. A., Hayes, N. M., & Nelson, L. E. (2010). Helping CIOs understand “Smart City” initiatives: Defining the smart city, its drivers, and the role of the CIO. Cambridge: Forrester Research, Inc.Google Scholar
  42. Winters, J. V. (2011). Why are smart cities growing? Who moves and who stays. Journal of Regional Science, 51(2), 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yigitcanlar, T., Velibeyoglu, K., & Martinez-Fernandez, C. (2008). Rising knowledge cities: The role of urban knowledge precincts. Journal of knowledge management, 12(5), 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of GovernanceUtrecht UniversityUtrechtNetherlands

Personalised recommendations