Advertisement

Characterizing the Role of Governments in Smart Cities: A Literature Review

  • Manuel Pedro Rodríguez BolívarEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 11)

Abstract

The growth of smart cities is forcing governments to think the need to advance in the implementation of information and communication technologies (ICTs) for the improvement of the citizenry’s participation in decision-making processes, the increasing efficiency of public services, and the improvement of transparency and accountability. In this regard, governments in smart cities are called to play a key role in promoting and managing these cities. Based on prior research, this chapter seeks to analyze the role of governments in smart cities, trying to identify different patterns of management styles in these cities. Also, differences between theoretical and empirical studies about the role of governments in smart cities are identified proposing new research themes for the future.

Keywords

Smart cities Smart governance Role of governments Management styles 

Abbreviations

ICTs

Information and communication technologies

PPP

Public–private partnerships

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was carried out with financial support from the Regional Government of Andalusia (Spain), Department of Innovation, Science and Enterprise (Research project number P11-SEJ-7700).

References

  1. Aurigi, A. (2005). Making the digital city: The early shaping of urban internet space. Farnborough: Ashgate Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  2. Bae, J., & Feiock, R. C. (2013). Forms of government and climate change policies in U.S. cities. Urban Studies, 50(4), 776–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbry, E. (2012). The internet of things, legal aspects. What will change (everything). Communications and Strategy, 87(3), 83–100.Google Scholar
  4. Bătăgan, L. (2011). Smart cities and sustainability models. Informatica Economică, 15(3), 80–87.Google Scholar
  5. Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G., Portugali, Y., et al. (2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 481–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Behan, K., Maoh, H., & Kanaroglou, P. (2008). Smart growth strategies, transportation and urban sprawl: Simulated futures for Hamilton, Ontario. The Canadian Geographer, 52(3), 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berg, A., & Hukkinen, J. (2011). The paradox of growth critique: Narrative analysis of the Finnish sustainable consumption and production debate. Ecological Economics, 72, 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coe, A., Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (2001). E-governance and smart communities: A social learning challenge. Social Science Computer Review, 19(1), 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conroy, R. M. (2012). What hypotheses do “nonparametric” two-group tests actually test? Stata Journal, 12(2), 182–190.Google Scholar
  11. Considine, M., & Lewis, J. (1999). Governance at ground level: The front-line bureaucrat in the age of markets and networks. Public Administration Review, 59(6), 467–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crabtree, B., & Miller, W. (Eds.). (1999). Doing qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. D'Alessandro, S., Luzzati, T., & Morroni, M. (2010). Energy transition towards economic and environmental sustainability: Feasible paths and policy implications. Journal of Cleaner Production 18(4), 291–298.Google Scholar
  14. Daneshpour, A., & Shakibamanesh, A. (2011). Compact city; dose it create an obligatory context for urban sustainability? International Journal of Architectural Engineering and Urban Planning, 21(2), 110–118.Google Scholar
  15. Deakin, M. (2012). Intelligent cities as smart providers: CoPs as organizations for developing integrated models of eGovernment services. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 115–135.Google Scholar
  16. Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farris, J. T. (2001). The barriers to using urban infill development to achieve smart growth. Housing Policy Debate, 12(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fazekas, M., & Burns, T. (2012). Exploring the complex interaction between governance and knowledge in education. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 67. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k9flcx2l340-en.
  20. Ferro, E., Caroleo, B., Leo, M., Osella, M., & Pautasso, E. (2013). The role of ICT in smart cities governance. Proceedings to the International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, Krems, Austria, May 22–25, 2013.Google Scholar
  21. Flipo F., & Schneider, F. (2008). Proceedings of the first conference for ecological sustainability and social equity. Paris: Research & Degrowth, Telecom Sud-Paris.Google Scholar
  22. Fotopoulos, T. (1997). Towards an inclusive democracy: The crisis of the growth economy and the need for a new liberatory project. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  23. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Meijers, E., & Pichler-Milanović, N. (2007). Smart cities: Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna. http://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf.
  24. Goodwin, M., & Painter, J. (1996). Local governance, the crises of Fordism and the changing geographies of regulation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 21(4), 635–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gouldson, A., Hills, P., & Welford, R. (2008). Ecological modernisation and policy learning in Hong Kong. Geoforum, 39(1), 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hawkins, C. V. (2011). Smart growth policy choice: A resource dependency and local governance explanation. Policy Studies Journal, 39(4), 679–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up. City, 12(3), 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Huber, J. C., & Wagner-Döbler, R. (2003). Using the Mann–Whitney test on informetric data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(8), 798–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hueting, R. (1980). New scarcity and economic growth: More welfare through less production? Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  30. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Kettl, D. F. (2006). Managing boundaries in American administration: The collaboration imperative. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 256–270). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. King, N. (2014). Template analysis [www page]. School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield Web. http://hhs.hud.ac.uk/w2/research/template_analysis/. Accessed 9 March 2014.
  34. Komninos, N. (2002). Intelligent cities. London: Spon.Google Scholar
  35. Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Kooiman, J., Banvick, M., Chuenpadgee, R., Mahon, R., & Pullin, R. (2008). Interactive governance and governability: An introduction. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 7(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  37. Koppenjan, J., & Klijn, E.-H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Kourtit, K., & Nijkamp, P. (2012). Smart cities in the innovation age. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 93–95.Google Scholar
  39. Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., & Arribas, D. (2012). Smart cities in perspective—A comparative European study by means of self-organizing maps. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 229–246.Google Scholar
  40. Lee, M., & Park, H. W. (2012). Exploring the web visibility of world-class universities. Scientometrics, 90(1), 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee, J. H., Hancockb, M. G., & Hu, M.-G. (2013). Towards an effective framework for building smart cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. In press, corrected proof. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162513002187. Accessed Jan 2014.
  42. Leydesdorff, L., & Deakin, M. (2011). The triple-helix model of smart cities: A neo-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L., & Stoker, G. (2001). Trends in public participation: Part 1—local government perspectives. Public Administration, 79(1), 205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mah, D. N.-Y., & Hills, P. (2012). Collaborative governance for sustainable development: Wind resource assessment in Xinjiang and Guangdong provinces, China. Sustainable Development, 20(2), 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Margetts, H. (2005). Smartening up to risk in electronic government. Information Polity, 10(1–2), 81–94.Google Scholar
  47. Martinez-Alier, J. (2009). Socially sustainable economic de-growth 2009. Development and Change, 40(6), 1099–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McLaverty, P. (Ed.). (2002). Public participation and innovations in community governance. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  49. Meijer, A. J., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2013). Governing the smart city: Scaling-up the search for socio-techno synergy. Paper presented at EGPA Conference 2013, Edinburgh, Scotland.Google Scholar
  50. Mergel, I. (2013). Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the US federal government. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mohamed, R. (2008). Who would pay for rural open space preservation and inner-city redevelopment? Identifying support for policies that can contribute to regional land use governance. Urban Studies, 45(13), 2783–2803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance, Tallinn, Estonia, 26–28 September 2011. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2072100.
  53. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2012). Transforming city government: A case study of Philly311. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance, ICEGOV 2012. Albany, NY, United States, 22–25 October, 2012, pp. 310–319.Google Scholar
  54. Neuman, M. (2005). The compact city fallacy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(1), 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Odendaal, N. (2003). Information and communication technology and local governance: Understanding the difference between cities in developed and emerging economies. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 27(6), 585–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Odum, H. T., & Odum, E. C. (2001). The prosperous way down. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  57. Ortiz-Fournier, L. V., Márquez, V., Flores, F. R., Rivera-Vázquez, J. C., Colón, P. A., et al. (2010). Integrating educational institutions to produce intellectual capital for sustainability in Caguas, Puerto Rico. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 8, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pierre, J., & Peter, G. (2000). Governance, politics and the state. Macmillan Press: Basingstoke, Hampshire.Google Scholar
  60. Portney, K. E., & Berry, J. M. (2010). Participation and the pursuit of sustainability in US cities. Urban Affairs Review, 46(1), 119–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration and Research Theory, 18(2), 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Puppim de Oliveira, J. A., Doll, C. N. H., Balaban, O., Jiang, P., Dreyfus, M., et al. (2013). Green economy and governance in cities: Assessing good governance in key urban economic processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 58, 138–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rapkin, B. D., & Luke, D. A. (1993). Cluster analysis in community research: Epistemology and practice. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21(2), 247–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rohman, I. K. (2012). Will telecommunications development improve the quality of life in African countries? Info, 14(4), 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sauer, S. C. (2012). Do smart cities produce smart entrepreneurs? Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3), 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schneider, F., Kallis, G., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2010). Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 511–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Scholl, H. (2009). Profiling the EG research community and its core. In M. A. Wimmer, H. J. Scholl, M. Janssen, & R. Traunmüller (Eds.), Proceedings of 8th international conference on electronic government, EGOV 2009 (pp. 1–12). Berlin: Springer LNCS 5693.Google Scholar
  69. Scholl, H. J., & Scholl, M. C. (2014). Smart governance: A roadmap for research and practice. iConference 2014 proceedings. Berlin, Germany, 4–7 March 2014, pp. 163–176.Google Scholar
  70. Schuurman, D., Baccarne, B., De Marez, L., & Mechant, P. (2012). Smart ideas for smart cities: Investigating crowdsourcing for generating and selecting ideas for ICT innovation in a city context. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3), 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Scott, J. W. (2007). Smart growth as urban reform: A pragmatic ‘recoding’ of the new regionalism. Urban Studies, 44(1), 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sheskin, D. J. (2007). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC, Taylor & Francis Group LLC.Google Scholar
  73. Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1981). Statistical methods. Iowa: The Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Span, K. C. L., Luijkx, K. G., Schols, J. M. G. A., & Schalk, R. (2012). The relationship between governance roles and performance in local public interorganizational networks: A conceptual analysis. American Review of Public Administration, 42(2), 186–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Spangenberg, J. H. (2010). The growth discourse, growth policy and sustainable development: Two thought experiments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 561–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sprent, P., & Smeeton, N. C. (2007). Applied nonparametric statistical methods. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC, Taylor & Francis Group LLC.Google Scholar
  77. Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stoker, G., Smith, G., Malony, W., & Young, S. (2003). Voluntary organisations and the generation of social capital. In M. Boddy & M. Parkinson (Eds.), City matters. Competitiveness, cohesion and urban governance (pp. 389–407). Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  79. Torfing, J., Sorensen, E., & Christensen, L. P. (2003). Nine competing definitions of governance, governance networks and meta-governance. Denmark: Roskilde University.Google Scholar
  80. Torfing, J. B., Peters, G., Pierre, J., & Sörensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tranos, E., & Gertner, D. (2012). Smart networked cities? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 175–190.Google Scholar
  82. Walravens, N. (2012). Mobile business and the smart city: Developing a business model framework to include public design parameters for mobile city services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3), 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Walravens, N., & Ballon, P. (2013). Platform business models for smart cities: From control and value to governance and public value. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(6), 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review (Editorial). MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Business StudiesUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations