Technology Helps, People Make: A Smart City Governance Framework Grounded in Deliberative Democracy
In sharp contrast to perspectives which overestimate the role played by technology in promoting smart cities initiatives, this chapter explores an important dimension for a full development of smart cities, the integration of human dimensions. Based on the theoretical model of Habermasian deliberative democracy, the chapter proposes a revision of the Chourabi et al. (2012) analytical framework for smart cities initiatives, in which people are as important as technology. In particular, we state that success of smart city initiatives depends upon the capability of integrating people and communities engagement with the advantages of information and communication technologies (ICTs), within a comprehensive smart city governance framework.
KeywordsTechnology Habermasian model Governance People and communities Smart city Framework
Information and Communication Technologies
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
- Al-Dalou, R., & Abu-Shanab, E. (2013). E-participation levels and technologies. The 6th International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT 2013), Amman, Jordan, 8–10 May (pp. 1–8). http://sce.zuj.edu.jo/icit13/images/Camera%20Ready/E-Technology/656.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
- Alexander, C. (Ed.). (1998). Digital democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bessette, J. M. (1980). Deliberative democracy: The majority principle in republican government. In R. Goldwin & W. Schambra (Eds.), How democratic is the constitution? Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
- Bohman, J., & Rehg, W. (Eds.). (1997). Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Bowker, N., & Tuffin, K. (2003). Dicing with deception: People with disabilities’ strategies for managing safety and identity online. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 8(2). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00209.x.Google Scholar
- Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2004). Citizen adoption of electronic government initiatives. System Sciences. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on IEEE (p. 10). http://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/2004/2056/05/205650119c.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
- Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., & Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. System Science (HICSS). 45th Hawaii International Conference on IEEE (pp. 2289–2297). http://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/2012/4525/00/4525c289.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
- Christiano, T. (1996). The rule of the many. Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Clarke, M., & Stewart, J. (1998). Community governance, community leadership and the new local government. YPS for the Joseph Rowntree foundation. http://www.jrf.org.uk/system/files/lgr119.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
- Denters, B., & Rose, L. E. (2005). Comparing local governance—Trends and developments. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Department of Innovation, Industry and Regional Development, State Government of Victoria, Australia. (2009). Web 2.0: The new tools for democratic conversations—A snapshot of initiatives in government. http://www.egov.vic.gov.au/. Accessed 29 July 2014.
- Edwards, A. R. (2002). The moderator as an emerging democratic intermediary: The role of the moderator in Internet discussions about public issues. Information Polity, 7(1), 3–20.Google Scholar
- European Commission. (2009). Public services 2.0: The impact of social computing on public services. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC54203.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
- Giffinger, R., Kramar, H., & Haindl, G. (2007). The role of rankings in growing city competition. Proceedings of the 11th European Urban Research Association (EURA) Conference, Milan, Italy, October 9–11. http://publik.tuwien.ac.at/files/PubDat_167218.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
- Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Habermas, J. (1998). Facticidad y validez. Madrid: Trotta.Google Scholar
- Habermas, J. (2003). Truth and justification. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Habermas, J. (2005a). Between naturalism and religion. Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Hall, R. E. (2000). The vision of a smart city. Proceedings of the 2nd International Life Extension Technology Workshop, Paris, France, September 28. http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/773961oyxp82/webviewable/773961.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
- Harding, A. (1995). Elite theory and growth machines. In D. Judge, G. Stoker, & H. Wolman (Eds.), Theories of urban politics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Holzer, M., Melitski, J., Rho, S., & Schwester, R. (2004). Restoring trust in government: The potential of digital citizen participation. E-Government Series, IBM Center for The Business of Government. http://www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/HolzerReport.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
- Internet Content Syndication Council. (2008). Content creation and distribution in an expanding Internet universe: A white paper. http://internetsyndication.org. Accessed 29 July 2014.
- Johnston, E. W., & Hansen, D. L. (2011). Design lessons for smart governance infrastructures. American Governance, 3, 197–212.Google Scholar
- Judge, D., Stoker, G., & Wolman, H. (1995). Urban politics and theory. In D. Judge, G. Stoker, & H. Wolman (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (pp. 1–12). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Kamarck, E. C., & Nye, J. S. (Eds. 2002). Governance.com: Democracy in the Information Age. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- Kersting, N., & Vetter, A. (Eds.). (2003). Reforming local government in Europe: Closing the gap between democracy and efficiency. Opladen: Springer DE, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
- Kim, M. K., & Jee, K. Y. (2006). Characteristics of individuals influencing adoption intentions for portable Internet service. ETRI Journal, 28(1), 67–76.Google Scholar
- Kooiman, J. (Ed.). (1993). Modern governance: New government-society interactions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Komninos, N., Pallot, M., & Schaffers, H. (2013). Special issue on smart cities and the future internet in europe. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(2), 119–134. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0083-x.
- Lynn, L. E., Heinrich, C. J., & Hill, C. J. (2000). Studying governance and public management: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 233–262.Google Scholar
- Mooij, J. (2003). Smart governance? Politics in the policy process in Andhra Pradesh, India. (Working Paper 228). London: Overseas Development Institute. http://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/2464.pdf.
- Mossberger, K., & Jimenez, B. (2009). Can e-government promote civic engagement? A study of local government websites in Illinois and the US. Institute for Policy and Civic Engagement Research Partnership. http://www.uic.edu/cuppa/ipce/interior/egovtfinalreport2009.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
- Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship. The internet, society, and participation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times (pp. 282–291). Accessed 29 July 2014.Google Scholar
- Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2001). Citizens as partners. Information, consultation, and public participation in policy making. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/4201131e.pdf?expires=1435076834&id=id&accname=id15861&checksum=2B2313630BEA54DF1FD511B4E55792A3.
- Osborne, S., & McLaughlin, K. (2002). The new public management in context. In K. McLaughlin, S. Osborne, & E. Ferlie (Eds.), New public management. Current trends and future prospects (pp. 7–14). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Pierre, J. (2000). Debating governance: Authority, steering, and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Polat, R. K., & Pratchett, L. (2009). E-citizenship: Reconstructing the public online. Changing local governance, changing citizens. doi:10.1332/policypress/9781847422170003.0011. Accessed 29 July 2014.Google Scholar
- Prats, J. (2003). El concepto y el análisis de la gobernabilidad. Revista Instituciones y Desarrollo, 14–15, 239–269.Google Scholar
- Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Rubaii-Barrett, N., & Wise, L. R. (2006). Language minorities and the digital divide: A study of state e-government accessibility. Journal of Public Management & Social Policy, 12(2), 5–27.Google Scholar
- Stone, D. A. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly, 104(2), 281. http://search.proquest.com/docview/208315275?accountid=1325.
- Toppeta, D. (2010). The smart city vision: How innovation and ICT can build smart, “Livable”, sustainable Cities. The Innovation Knowledge Foundation. http://www.thinkinnovation.org/file/research/23/en/Toppeta_Report_005_2010.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
- Washburn, D., Sindhu, U., Balaouras, S., Dines, R. A., Hayes, N. M., & Nelson, L. E. (2010). Helping CIOs understand “Smart City” initiatives: Defining the smart city, its drivers, and the role of the CIO. Cambridge: Forrester Research, Inc. http://public.dhe.ibm.com/partnerworld/pub/smb/smarterplanet/forr_help_cios_und_smart_city_initiatives.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.Google Scholar