Social Media Experiences at County Level: The Case of the State of Mexico

  • Rodrigo Sandoval-AlmazánEmail author
  • Juan Carlos Núñez Armas
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 11)


Social media started to be used in public administration in the 1990s. After the Web 2.0 tools impacted government websites, the new trend of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram were implemented in home pages. However, very little is known regarding the consequences of these new technologies and their relationship with citizens and public officials. The focus of this chapter is to understand the link between social media and smart cities. Since citizens use information technologies to communicate, collaborate, and interact, these same activities can be used in smart cities. In order to understand this linkage, we developed a questionnaire based on two different but complementary frameworks related to social media and smart cities and interviewed the chief information officers (CIO)’s of eight cities in the State of Mexico. Our findings reveal that social media tools are immersed into the smart cities’ practices. As a consequence, they are bringing changes in the departments, systems, and relationships among internal agencies. If social media tools are going to be used, then important issues such as inclusion, empowerment, and information quality need to be addressed.


Smart Cities Social media Twitter Facebook Mixed research 


  1. Agostino, D. (2013). Using social media to engage citizens: A study of Italian municipalities. Public Relations Review, 39, 232–234. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.02.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alfano, G. (2011). Adapting bureaucracy to the Internet. The case of Venice Local Government. Information Polity, 16, 5–22.Google Scholar
  3. Asgarkhani, M. (2005). The effectiveness of e-service in local government: A case study. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 3, 157–166.Google Scholar
  4. Attour-Oueslati, A., Dufresne, D., & Longhi, C. (2007). The development of the local e-administration: Empirical evidences from the French case.Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, J., Algermissen, L., & Niehaves, B. (2003). Processes in e-government focus: A procedure model for process oriented reorganisation in public administrations on the local level. In R. Traunmüller (Ed.), Electronic government: Second international conference, EGOV 2003, Prague, Czech Republic, September 2003: Proceedings, lecture notes in computer science (pp. 147–150). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Bertot, J. C. (1998). Challenges and issues for public managers in the digital era. Public Manager, 27, 27.Google Scholar
  7. Bochicchio, M. A., Celentano, M. G., & Longo, A. (2004). Innovation needs in the e-government scenario: A survey. In R. Traunmüller (Ed.), Electronic government, lecture notes in computer science (pp. 347–354). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, M. M. (2001). The benefits and costs of information technology innovations: An empirical assessment of a local government agency. Pubic Performance & Management Review, 24, 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T. A., & Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS ’12. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 2289–2297. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2012.615.Google Scholar
  11. Chun, S. A., Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Sandoval-Almazán, R. (2012). Collaborative e-government. Transforming Goverment: People, Process and Policy, 6, 5–12. doi:10.1108/17506161211214868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crano, W., & Marilynn, B. (2002). Principles and methods of social research. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. De Saulles, M. (2011). Social media and local government in England: Who is doing what? Presented at the 11th European Conference on eGovernment (ECEG 2011), Academic Conference International Ltd., 2011, pp. 187–192.Google Scholar
  14. Deb, G. K. (1999). Electronic governance—A vehicle for the new world order. Electronics Information & Planning, 27, 29–33.Google Scholar
  15. Dobrev, B., Stoewer, M., Makris, L., & Getsova, E. (2002). E-MuniS—Electronic municipal information services—Best practice transfer and improvement project: Project approach and intermediary results. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Flick, U. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Freeman, R. J. (2004). The Los Angeles county experience: A field study of information technology issues challenging local government. Journal of E-Government, 1, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gil-Garcia, J. R., Aldama-Nalda, A., (2013). Making a city smarter through information integration: Angel network and the role of political leadership. 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS 2013). pp. 1724–1733.Google Scholar
  19. Griffin, D., & Halpin, E. (2005). An exploratory evaluation of UK local e-government from an accountability perspective. The Electronic Journal of E-Government, 3, 13–28.Google Scholar
  20. Griffin, D., Trevorrow, P., & Halpin, E. (2006). Using SMS texting to encourage democratic participation by youth citizens: A case study of a project in an English local authority. The Electronic Journal of E-Government, 4, 63–70.Google Scholar
  21. Ho, A. T. K. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62, 434–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ho, A. T.-K., & Smith, J. F.( 2001). Information technology planning and the Y2K problem in local governments. American Review of Public Administration, 31, 158–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holden, S. H., Norris, D. F., & Fletcher, P. D. (2003). Electronic government at the local level: Progress to date and future issues. Public Performance and Management Review, 26, 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holland, C. P., & Cahill, M. (2006). 3G technology in local government: Case examples of business process change and strategic innovation. Mobile government consortium international LLC.Google Scholar
  25. Hoogwout, M. (2002). Organizing for online service delivery: The effects of network technology on the organization of transactional service delivery in Dutch local government.Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Huerta-Carvajal, M. I., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2009). City boosterism through Internet marketing: An institutional perspective. In M. Gascó-Hernández & T. Torres-Coronas (Eds.), Information communication technologies and city marketing: Digital opportunities for cities around the world (pp. 130—151). Hershey: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. INEGI. (2010). Censo de Población y Vivienda 2010 (Population and Households Census).Online Scholar
  28. Jacumeit, V. (2002). Administration 2000 Networking municipal front and back offices for one-stop government. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Joo, I.-H., Kim, K.-S., & Kim, M.-S. (2004). Fire service in Korea: Advanced emergency 119 system based on GIS technology. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Jorgensen, D. J., & Cable, S. (2002). Facing the challenges of e-goverment: A case study of the city of Corpus Christi, Texas. S. A. M. Advanced Management Journal, 67, 15–21.Google Scholar
  31. Kim, H. J., & Bretschneider, S. (2004). Local government information technology capacity: An exploratory theory. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’04)—Track 5. Computer Societry Press, Island of Hawaii (Big Island), p. 50121b (1–10).Google Scholar
  32. Klang, M., & Nolin, J. (2011). Disciplining social media: An analysis of social media policies in 26 Swedish municipalities. First Monday, 16, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koussouris, S., Charalabidis, Y., Gionis, G., Tsitsanis, T., & Psarras, J. (2007). Building a local administration services portal for citizens and businesses: Service composition, architecture and back-office interoperability issues.Berlin: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  34. Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly (Selections from the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o2011)), 29, 446–454. doi: Scholar
  35. Lodge, J. (2003). Towards an e-commonwealth? A tool for peace and democracy? Round Table (372), 609–622.Google Scholar
  36. Mainka, A., Hartmann, S., Stock, W. G., & Peters, I. (2014). Government and social media: A case study of 31 informational world cities. 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS 2014). p. 10.Google Scholar
  37. Meer, A. van der, & Winden, W. van (2003). E-governance in cities: A comparison of urban information and communication technology policies. Regional Studies, 37, 407–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mergel, I. (2013a). Social media in the public sector: A guide to participation, collaboration and transparency in the networked world (1st ed.) Australia:Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  39. Mergel, I. (2013b). Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. Federal Government. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 123–130. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mossberger, K., Wu, Y., & Crawford, J. (2013). Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 351–358. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. O’Toole Jr., L. J., Brown, M. M., & Brudney, J. L. (1998). Implementing information technology in government: An empirical assessment of the role of local partnerships. Journal of Public Administration, 8, 499–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oliveira, G. H. M., & Welch, E. W. (2013). Social media use in local government: Linkage of technology, task, and organizational context. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 397–405. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parvez, Z. (2003). Local democracy shaping e-democracy. In R. Traunmüller (Ed.), Electronic government: Second international conference, EGOV 2003, Prague, Czech Republic, September 2003. Proceedings, lecture notes in computer science (pp. 63–68). Berlin: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  44. Pawlowska, A. (2002). Computing in Polish local administration—Nnew technology, old experience. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government Democracy in the Information Age, 7, 49–64.Google Scholar
  45. Pérez, M. D. C. C., De Rosario, A. H., Sáez Martín, A., Fernández, A., & Martínez-Monje, P. (2013). The Spanish smart cities and the social media. 7th International Conference on Methodologies, Technologies and Tools Enabling E-Government (MeTTeG 2013). pp. 11–20.Google Scholar
  46. Raths, D. (2011). Cities add citizen engagement mobile apps to their portfolios. KM World, 20, 10–11.Google Scholar
  47. Reddick, C. G. (2005). Citizen-initiated contacts with government: Comparing phones and websites. Journal of E-Government, 2, 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Richter, P., Cornford, J., & McLoughlin, I. (2004). The e-citizen as talk, as text and as technology: CRM and e-Government. Electronic Journal of E-government, 2, 207–218.Google Scholar
  49. Sandoval Almazan, R., & Gil Garcia, J. R. (2013). Social media in state governments: Preliminary results about the use of Facebook and Twitter in México. In E-Government Implementation and Practice in Developing Countries (pp. 128–146). United States of America: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  50. Sandoval-Almazan, R., Mendoza-Colín, J., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Luna-Reyes, D. E. (2011). Local government websites: Cases of innovation and best practices in Mexico. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times. ACM, College Park, Maryland, pp. 349–350. doi:10.1145/2037556.2037620.Google Scholar
  51. Scholl, H. J. (2006). Is e-government research a flash in the pan or here for the long shot?Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  52. Sekiguchi, Y., & Andersen, K. V. (1999). Information systems in Japanese government[a]. Information Infrastructure and Policy, 6, 109.Google Scholar
  53. Shah, B. P., & Lim, N. (2011). Using social media to increase e-government adoption in developing countries. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ICEGOV ’11. ACM, Tallinn, Estonia, pp. 205–213.Google Scholar
  54. Stoica, V., & Ilas, A. (2009). Romanian urban e-government. Digital services and digital democracy in 165 cities. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 7, 171–182.Google Scholar
  55. Thomson, C. S. (2002a). Enlisting on-line residents: Expanding the boundaries of e-government in a Japanese rural township. Government Information Quarterly, 19, 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thomson, C. S. (2002b). Recruiting cyber townspeople: Local government and the Internet in a rural Japanese township. Technology in Society, 24, 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Walravens, N. (2013). The city as a service platform: A typology of city platform roles in mobile service provision. Proceedings of 19th Americas conference on Information System (AMCIS).Google Scholar
  58. Walravens, N., & Ballon, P. (2011). The city as a platform: Exploring the potential role(s) of the city in mobile service provision through a mobile service platform typology. Presented at Tenth International Conference on Mobile Business (ICMB), pp. 60–67. doi:10.1109/ICMB.2011.22.Google Scholar
  59. Weare, C., Musso, J. A., & Hale, M. L. (1999). Electronic democracy and the diffusion of municipal web pages in California. Administration & Society, 31, 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. West, J. P., & Berman, E. M. (2001). The impact of revitalized management practices on the adoption of information technology: A national survey of local governments. Public Performance & Management Review, 24, 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wohlers, T. E., & Bernier, L. (2012). Innovative city hall: A comparative case study of policy adoption in the U.S. and France. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9, 415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zavattaro, S. M., & Sementelli, A. J. (2014). A critical examination of social media adoption in government: Introducing omnipresence. Government Information Quarterly. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.007.Google Scholar
  63. Zhou, L., & Wang, T. (2014). Social media: A new vehicle for city marketing in China. Cities, 37, 27–32. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2013.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazán
    • 1
    Email author
  • Juan Carlos Núñez Armas
    • 2
  1. 1.Universidad Autónoma del Estado de MéxicoTolucaMexico
  2. 2.Universidad Autónoma del Estado de MéxicoTolucaMexico

Personalised recommendations