Advertisement

How Do Southern European Cities Foster Innovation? Lessons from the Experience of the Smart City Approaches of Barcelona and Milan

  • Mila GascóEmail author
  • Benedetta Trivellato
  • Dario Cavenago
Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 11)

Abstract

Innovation, and technological innovation in particular, can help city governments meet the challenges of urban governance, improve urban environments, become more competitive, and address sustainability concerns. To prevent and manage these challenges, cities need to operate in an innovative way. In this context, the smart city approach is emerging as a way of solving tangled and difficult problems. However, there is not a unique and right strategy to develop a smart city. By drawing on a comparison between the experiences of Barcelona (Spain) and Milan (Italy), this chapter aims to explore similarities and differences in the way these two Southern European cities, both being the second largest in their respective countries, are building their smart city agenda. The ultimate aim is to identify the main features of two still developing approaches, which appear to be influenced by the increasing integration of smart dimensions and initiatives in the cities’ strategic agendas and the related opportunities and challenges.

Keywords

Smart cities Barcelona Milan Urban planning Innovation 

Abbreviations

BIE

Bureau International des Expositions

EU

European Union

ICT

Information and Communication technologies

IT

Information Technology

LGP

Local Government Plan

References

  1. AlAwadhi, S., & Scholl, H. J. (2013). Aspirations and realizations: The smart city of Seattle. Paper presented at the 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Maui, HI, January 7–10.Google Scholar
  2. Albrechts, L. (2006). Shifts in strategic spatial planning? Some evidence from Europe and Australia. Environment and Planning A, 38(6), 1149–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Centre for Cities. (2014). Smart cities. London: Centre for Cities.Google Scholar
  4. Charnock, G., & Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2011). A new space for knowledge and people? Henri Lefebvre, representations of space, and the production of 22@Barcelona. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(4): 613–632.Google Scholar
  5. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T., & Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. Paper presented at the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Maui, HI, January 4–7.Google Scholar
  6. Gallione, A. (2012) Dossier expo. Milan: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
  7. Gavaldà, J., & Ribera, R. (2012). Barcelona 5.0: From knowledge to smartness?. Working Paper Series, WP12-002. Barcelona: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.Google Scholar
  8. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities: Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna: Center of Regional Science.Google Scholar
  9. Leon, N. (2008). Attract and connect: The 22@Barcelona innovation district and the internationalisation of Barcelona business. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 10(2/3), 235–246.Google Scholar
  10. Leydesdorff, L., & Deakin, M. (2011). The triple-helix model of smart cities: A new-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2): 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lombardi, P. (2011). New challenges in the evaluation of smart cities. Network Industries Quarterly, 13(3), 8–10.Google Scholar
  12. Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Wael, Y. (2011). An analytic network model for smart cities. Paper presented at the 11th International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Sorrento, June 15–18.Google Scholar
  13. Meijer, A., & Rodríguez-Bolívar, P. (2014). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Science (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  14. Memo, F., Rancati, S., & Zajczyk, F. (2011). Il governo del territorio in Lombardia. Un “modello” di deregolamentazione?. In A. Mazzette (Ed.), Esperienze di governo del territorio (pp. 56–101). Roma & Bari: Editori Laterza.Google Scholar
  15. Mingione, E., Dell’Agnese, E., Mugnano, S., D’Ovidio, M., Niessen, B., & Sedini, C. (2007). Milan city-region: Is it still competitive and charming? Pathways to creative and knowledge-based regions. ACRE report 2.12. Amsterdam: AMIDSt.Google Scholar
  16. Mingione, E., Zajczyk, F., Dell’Agnese, E., Mugnano, S., D’Ovidio, M., Sedini, C., & Parrino, L. (2010). Policies and strategies in the Metropolitan Region of Milan. How to enhance the city’s competitiveness. ACRE report 10.12. Amsterdam: AISSR.Google Scholar
  17. Minzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Morandi, C., Andrea, R., & Di Vita, S. (2013). ICT: Interfacce tra persone e luoghi. Sperimentazioni in corso per una smart (city-)region del Nord Italia: Il territorio tra Torino e Milano verso l’Expo 2015 e oltre. TeMA: Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 1(2013), 19–33.Google Scholar
  19. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. (2011a). Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. Paper presented at ICEGOV 2011. Tallinn, September 26–28.Google Scholar
  20. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. (2011b). Conceptualizing smart city dimensions of technology, people and institutions. Paper presented at the 12th Annual international Conference on Digital Government Research. College Park, MD, June 12–15.Google Scholar
  21. Naphade, M., Banavar, G., Harrison, C., Paraszczak, J., & Morris, R. (2011). Smarter cities and their innovation challenges. Computer, 44(6), 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pasqui, G., Armondi, S. & Fedeli, V. (2010). I piani strategici alla prova. In R. Florio (Ed.). 10 anni di pianificazione strategica in Italia. Ragioni, esiti, criticità (pp. 9–118). Florence: ReCS—Rete delle Città Strategiche.Google Scholar
  23. Pyrozhenko, V. (2011). Implementing open government: Exploring the ideological links between open government and the free and open source software movement. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Public Management Research Conference. Syracuse, NY, June 2–4.Google Scholar
  24. Sartorio, F. S. (2005). Strategic spatial planning: A historical review of approaches, its recent revival, and an overview of the state of the art in Italy. DISP, 162(3) 26–40.Google Scholar
  25. Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., & Oliveira, A. (2011). Smart cities and the future Internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In J. Domingue et al. (Eds.). Future Internet Assembly 2011. Achievements and technological promises (pp. 431–446). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Townsend, A. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Trivellato, B., Cavenago, D., & Beltrami, G. (2013). Is strategic urban planning becoming ‘smarter’? Reflections on a selection of European cities. Paper presented at the 2013 EGPA Annual Conference. Edinburgh, September 11–13.Google Scholar
  28. Wang, H., Song, Y., Hamilton, A., & Curwell, S. (2007). Urban information integration for advanced e-planning in Europe. Government Information Quarterly, 24(4), 736–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zenker, S., Eggers, F., & Farsky, M. (2013). Putting a price tag on cities: Insights into the competitive environment of places. Cities, 30, 133–139.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mila Gascó
    • 1
    Email author
  • Benedetta Trivellato
    • 2
  • Dario Cavenago
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Public Governance and ManagementESADE-Ramon Llull UniversityBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and Social ResearchUniversity of Milano-BicoccaMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations