Modeling Reserve Ancillary Service as Virtual Energy Carrier in Multi-Energy Systems

  • M. Y. Damavandi
  • Mohsen Parsa Moghaddam
  • M.-R. Haghifam
  • M. Shafie-khah
  • João P. S. CatalãoEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 450)


Multi-energy systems (MES) are considered various energy carriers and energy players in an integrated energy model. Vast amount of decision making data is gathered in these systems that cannot be processed by conventional methods. Cloud-based computing is an opportunity to develop these kinds of integrated and efficient approaches. Developing mathematical models that can be compatible with cloud-based engineering systems will help decision makers to enhance the system agendas in short to long term studies. In this paper, the energy hub approach is developed to consider electric reserve ancillary service in MES. The reserve is modeled as a virtual energy output that can be injected into the upstream network. The reserve service is defined for electric energy converters and storages, comprehensively. Therefore, the energy hub mathematical model is developed and new elements are added to the input and output vectors and system conversion matrix. For energy converters, reserve is defined as the capability of the converter to increase its output service to its maximum operational limits. Moreover, for electric storages this capability is also restricted by storages’ state of charges. The numerical results demonstrate the importance of reserve considerations in MESs and allow assessing the proficiency of the proposed model.


Energy hub model Multi-energy system Reserve ancillary service 


  1. 1.
    Mancarella, P.: MES (multi-energy systems): An overview of concepts and evaluation models. Energy 65, 1–17 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mancarella, P., Chicco, G.: Real-Time Demand Response From Energy Shifting in Distributed Multi-Generation. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 4, 1928–1938 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Geidl, M., Koeppel, G., Favre-Perrod, P., Klockvl, B., Andersson, G., Frohlich, K.: Energy hubs for the future. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine 5(1), 24–30 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chicco, G., Mancarella, P.: Matrix modelling of small-scale trigeneration systems and application to operational optimization. Energy 34, 261–273 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schulze, M., Friedrich, L., Gautschi, M.: Modeling and optimization of renewables: Applying the energy hub approach. In: Proc. ICSET Conf. (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kienzle, F., Ahcin, P., Andersson, G.: Valuing Investments in Multi-Energy Conversion, Storage, and Demand-Side Management Systems Under Uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Sustainable Energy 2, 194–202 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mancarella, P., Chicco, G.: Real-Time Demand Response From Energy Shifting in Distributed Multi-Generation. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 4, 1928–1938 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bozchalui, M.C., Hashmi, S.A., Hassen, H., Canizares, C.A., Bhattacharya, K.: Optimal Operation of Residential Energy Hubs in Smart Grids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 3, 1755–1766 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Houwing, M., Negenborn, R.R., De Schutter, B.: Demand Response with Micro-CHP Systems. Proceedings of the IEEE 99(1), 200–213 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Almassalkhi, M., Hiskens, I.: Impact of energy storage on cascade mitigation in multi-energy systems. In: Proc. IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, pp. 1–8. San Diego (July 2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haghifam, M.R., Manbachi, M.: Reliability and availability modeling of combined heat and power (CHP) systems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 33(3), 385–393 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Galus, M.D., Koch, S., Andersson, G.: Provision of Load Frequency Control by PHEVs, Controllable Loads, and a Cogeneration Unit. IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics 58, 4568–4582 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mancarella, P., Chicco, G.: Integrated energy and ancillary services provision in multi-energy systems. In: Proc. IREP Symposium (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adamek, F., Arnold, M., Andersson, G.: On Decisive Storage Parameters for Minimizing Energy Supply Costs in Multicarrier Energy Systems. IEEE Trans. Sustainable Energy 5, 102–109 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Y. Damavandi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mohsen Parsa Moghaddam
    • 1
  • M.-R. Haghifam
    • 1
  • M. Shafie-khah
    • 2
  • João P. S. Catalão
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Tarbiat Modares University (TMU)TehranIran
  2. 2.University of Beira InteriorCovilhãPortugal
  3. 3.INESC-IDLisbonPortugal
  4. 4.Instituto Superior TécnicoLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations