Advertisement

Transanal Approaches: Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS)

  • John P. Burke
  • Matthew R. Albert
Chapter

Abstract

Following the popularization of colorectal cancer screening, the incidence of large rectal polyps and early-stage cancer is increasing [1]. Due to the suboptimal functional outcomes following proctectomy, an aging population, stoma aversion, and improving response rates following neoadjuvant chemoradiation, local excision of large polyp early-stage rectal cancer is increasingly being requested by patients and utilized in clinical practice [2]. The modalities available for the local excision of both large polyps and early-stage rectal cancers include traditional transanal excision (TAE), colonoscopic/endoscopic mucosal resection, and transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM).

Keywords

Proctectomy Transanal excision Transanal endoscopic microsurgery Transanal endoscopic operation TAMIS 

Supplementary material

(MP4 867900 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Logan RF, Patnick J, Nickerson C, Coleman L, Rutter MD, von Wagner C. Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests. Gut. 2012;61:1439–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    You YN, Baxter NN, Stewart A, Nelson H. Is the increasing rate of local excision for stage I rectal cancer in the United States justified?: a nationwide cohort study from the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg. 2007;245:726–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buess G, Hutterer F, Theiss J, Bobel M, Isselhard W, Pichlmaier H. [A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation] Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen. Chirurg. 1984;55:677–80.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clancy C, Burke JP, Albert MR, O’Connell PR, Winter DC. Trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery versus standard transanal excision for the removal of rectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barendse RM, van den Broek FJ, Dekker E, Bemelman WA, de Graaf EJ, Fockens P, Reitsma JB. Systematic review of endoscopic mucosal resection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large rectal adenomas. Endoscopy. 2011;43:941–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arezzo A, Passera R, Saito Y, Sakamoto T, Kobayashi N, Sakamoto N, Yoshida N, Naito Y, Fujishiro M, Niimi K, Ohya T, Ohata K, Okamura S, Iizuka S, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N, Fusaroli P, Bonino MA, Verra M, Morino M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large noninvasive rectal lesions. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:427–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barendse RM, Dijkgraaf MG, Rolf UR, Bijnen AB, Consten EC, Hoff C, Dekker E, Fockens P, Bemelman WA, de Graaf EJ. Colorectal surgeons’ learning curve of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3591–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maslekar S, Pillinger SH, Sharma A, Taylor A, Monson JR. Cost analysis of transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal tumours. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9:229–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Di Franco F, Harris AM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision versus conventional multiport appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1709–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Desiderio J, Guarino S, Santoro A, Parisi A, Noya G, Boselli C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100:191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2200–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Monson JR, Weiser MR, Buie WD, Chang GJ, Rafferty JF, Buie WD, Rafferty J. Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:535–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barker JA, Hill J. Incidence, treatment and outcome of rectal stenosis following transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Tech Coloproctol. 2011;15:281–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bhangu A, Brown G, Nicholls RJ, Wong J, Darzi A, Tekkis P. Survival outcome of local excision versus radical resection of colon or rectal carcinoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) population-based study. Ann Surg. 2013;258:563–9. discussion 9-71.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saraste D, Gunnarsson U, Janson M. Predicting lymph node metastases in early rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1104–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beaton C, Twine CP, Williams GL, Radcliffe AG. Systematic review and meta-analysis of histopathological factors influencing the risk of lymph node metastasis in early colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:788–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McDermott FD, Heeney A, Courtney D, Mohan H, Winter D. Rectal carcinoids: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2020–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lezoche E, Baldarelli M, Lezoche G, Paganini AM, Gesuita R, Guerrieri M. Randomized clinical trial of endoluminal locoregional resection versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for T2 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1211–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eyvazzadeh DJ, Lee JT, Madoff RD, Mellgren AF, Finne CO. Outcomes after transanal endoscopic microsurgery with intraperitoneal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:438–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Albert MR, Atallah SB, de Beche-Adams TC, Izfar S, Larach SW. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:301–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Atallah S, Albert M, Debeche-Adams T, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS): applications beyond local excision. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17:239–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    de Lacy AM, Rattner DW, Adelsdorfer C, Tasende MM, Fernandez M, Delgado S, Sylla P, Martinez-Palli G. Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) rectal resection: “down-to-up” total mesorectal excision (TME)—short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3165–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Albert M, Debeche-Adams T, Nassif G, Hunter L, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): results and experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curative-intent rectal cancer surgery at a single institution. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;18(5):473–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang H, Zhang YS, Jin XW, Li MZ, Fan JS, Yang ZH. Transanal single-port laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17:117–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fernandez-Esparrach G, Ayuso-Colella JR, Sendino O, Pages M, Cuatrecasas M, Pellise M, Maurel J, Ayuso-Colella C, Gonzalez-Suarez B, Llach J, Castells A, Gines A. EUS and magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of rectal cancer: a prospective and comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:347–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hompes R, Ris F, Cunningham C, Mortensen NJ, Cahill RA. Transanal glove port is a safe and cost-effective alternative for transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1429–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gorgun IE, Aytac E, Costedio MM, Erem HH, Valente MA, Stocchi L. Transanal endoscopic surgery using a single access port: a practical tool in the surgeon’s toybox. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1034–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barendse RM, Verlaan T, Bemelman WA, Fockens P, Dekker E, Nonner J, de Graaf EJ. Transanal single port surgery: selecting a suitable access port in a porcine model. Surg Innov. 2012;19:323–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marks JH, Frenkel JL, Greenleaf CE, D’Andrea AP. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery with entrance into the peritoneal cavity: is it safe? Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:1176–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Allaix ME, Rebecchi F, Giaccone C, Mistrangelo M, Morino M. Long-term functional results and quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1635–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kreis ME, Jehle EC, Haug V, Manncke K, Buess GF, Becker HD, Starlinger MJ. Functional results after transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:1116–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schiphorst AH, Langenhoff BS, Maring J, Pronk A, Zimmerman DD. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: initial experience and short-term functional results. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:927–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Levin TR, United States Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Committee. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Winter DC, Murphy A, Kell MR, Shields CJ, Redmond HP, Kirwan WO. Perioperative topical nitrate and sphincter function in patients undergoing transanal stapled anastomosis: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:697–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2018

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Colon & Rectal Surgery, Florida HospitalOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Colon & Rectal SurgeryCenter for Colon and Rectal Surgery, Florida HospitalOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations