Advertisement

Complexity Management in the Semiconductor Supply Chain and Manufacturing Using PROS Analysis

  • Can Sun
  • Thomas Rose
  • Hans Ehm
  • Stefan Heilmayer
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 449)

Abstract

Supply chain complexity is a rising problem, especially in the semiconductor industry. Many innovative activities occur in the daily supply chain and manufacturing, and these changes inevitably bring in the complexities to the organization. But not all of them are valuable to the business goals. Decision makers want to keep value-added complexity and reduce non-value-added complexity. To manage the complexity, we propose a framework with four steps from changes identification towards the final decision making. The core solution of this framework is PROS (process, role, object, state) idea, which provides an understandable and structural way to describe the complexity. A simplified small real example from semiconductor supply chain is used to demonstrate this approach. The results indicate that the PROS idea is able to analyze complexity from different aspects and extract most key information; however, how to measure the structural complexity of a large complex system without complete information is still under investigation.

Keywords

supply chain complexity change management process model complexity assessment semiconductor industry 

References

  1. 1.
    Uzsoy, R., Lee, C.Y., Martin-Vega, L.A.: A Review Of Production Planning And Scheduling Models In The Semiconductor Industry Part I: System Characteristics, Performance Evaluation And Production Planning. IIE Transactions 24(4), 47–60 (1992)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bauer, H., Kouris, I., Schlögl, G., Sigrist, T., Veira, J., Wee, D.: Mastering Variabilit. In: Complex Environments. Mckinsey Semiconductors (Autumn 2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Emami-Naeini, A., De Roover, D.: Control in Semiconductor Wafer Manufacturing. In: Proc. Symposium To Honor Bill Wolovich, 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Cancun, Mexico (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang, W., Rivera, D.E.: Model Predictive Control For Tactical Decision-Making In Semiconductor Manufacturing Supply Chain Management. IEEE Transactions On Control Systems Technology 16(5), 841–855 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christopher, M.: The Agile Supply Chain: Competing In Volatile Markets. Industrial Marketing Management 29(1), 37–44 (2000)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scheiter, S., Scheel, O., Klink, G.: How Much Does Complexity Really Cost? A.T. Kearney, Düsseldorf (2007), http://www.mycomplexity.com/publications.asp
  7. 7.
    Etheredge, K., O’Keefe, J.: Getting A Handle On Complexity. Supply Chain Management Review, A.T. Kearney (2010), http://www.atkearney.com/documents
  8. 8.
    Heywood, S., Spungin, J., Turnbull, D.: Cracking the complexity code. The McKinsey Quarterly (2), 85–95 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Birkinshaw, J., Heywood, S.: Putting organizational complexity. The McKinsey Quarterly (3) (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McKinsey and Company: McKinsey on Semiconductors (1) (Autumn 2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aelker, J., Bauernhansl, T., Ehm, H.: Managing complexity in supply chains: a discussion of current approaches on the example of the semiconductor industry. Procedia CIRP 7, 79–84 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Todnem By, R.: Organisational change management: A critical review. Journal of Change Management 5(4), 369–380 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kettinger, W.J., Teng, J.T., Guha, S.: Business process change: a study of methodologies, techniques, and tools. MIS Quarterly, 55–80 (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weber, B., Reichert, M., Rinderle-Ma, S.: Change patterns and change support features–enhancing flexibility in process-aware information systems. Data & knowledge Engineering 66(3), 438–466 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ElMaraghy, H.A., Kuzgunkaya, O., Urbanic, R.J.: Manufacturing systems configuration complexity. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 54(1), 445–450 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Deger, R.: Managing Complexity in Automotive Engineering. In: DSM 2007: Proceedings of the 9th International DSM Conference, Munich, Germany, October 16-18 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lindemann, U., Maurer, M.: Facing multi-domain complexity in product development. In: The Future of Product Development, pp. 351–361. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shannon, C.E.: A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal 21, 623–656 (1948)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schuh, G., Monostori, L., Csáji, B.C., Doering, S.: Complexity-based modeling of reconfigurable collaborations in production industry. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 57(1), 445–450 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bohner, S.A., Arnold, R.S.: Software change impact analysis. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1996)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Haberfellner, R.: Systems Engineering: Methodik und Praxis. Daenzer, W.F. (ed.). Verlag Industrielle Organisation (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alard, R.: ETH Chair of Technology and Innovation Management, Systems Engineering Methodology (2013), http://www.timgroup.ethz.ch/education/Courses_at_TIMGROUP/spring_2013/SE_FS_2013_final.pdf
  23. 23.
    Mylopoulos, J., Borgida, A., Jarke, M., Koubarakis, M.: Telos: Representing knowledge about information systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 8(4), 325–362 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dori, D.: Object Process Methodology: A Holistic Systems Paradigm; with CD-ROM. Springer (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dori, D.: Object-process analysis: maintaining the balance between system structure and behaviour. Journal of Logic and Computation 5(2), 227–249 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sharon, A., Dori, D.: A model-based approach for planning work breakdown structures of complex systems projects. In: Proc. 14th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing (2009)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Berry, B.J., Kiel, L.D., Elliott, E.: Adaptive agents, intelligence, and emergent human organization: Capturing complexity through agent-based modeling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99(Suppl. 3), 7187–7188 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Holling, C.S.: Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4(5), 390–405 (2001)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Helbing, D., Balietti, S.: How to do agent-based simulations in the future: From modeling social mechanisms to emergent phenomena and interactive systems design. Tech. Rep. 11-06-024, Santa Fe Institute, NM, USA, santa Fe Working Paper (June 2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Eric, S.K., Giorgini, P., Maiden, N. (eds.): Social modeling for requirements engineering. MIT Press (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Salado, A., Nilchiani, R.: The Concept of Problem Complexity. Procedia Computer Science 28, 539–546 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sun, C., Rose, T., Ehm, H., Heilmayer, S.: Complexity Measurement in the Semiconductor Supply Chain. Presented at International Conference on Operations Research 2014: business analytics and optimization (Aachen 2014)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bakker, C.B.: Why people don’t change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice 12(2), 164 (1975)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kotter, J.P., Cohen, D.S.: The heart of change: Real-life stories of how people change their organizations. Harvard Business Press (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Can Sun
    • 1
    • 2
  • Thomas Rose
    • 1
    • 3
  • Hans Ehm
    • 2
  • Stefan Heilmayer
    • 2
  1. 1.RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Infineon Technologies AGNeubibergGermany
  3. 3.Fraunhofer FIT, Schloss BirlinghovenSankt AugustinGermany

Personalised recommendations