Advertisement

Decision Making and Strategic Planning for Disaster Preparedness with a Multi-Criteria-Analysis Decision Support System

  • Sascha Schlobinski
  • Giulio Zuccaro
  • Martin Scholl
  • Daniel Meiers
  • Ralf Denzer
  • Sergio Guarino
  • Wolf Engelbach
  • Kuldar Taveter
  • Steven Frysinger
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 448)

Abstract

In the context of the CRISMA FP7 project we have developed a seamless decision support concept to connect simulated crisis scenarios and aggregated performance indicators of impact scenarios with state of the art Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods. To prove the practicality of the approach we have developed a decision support tool realising the important aspects of the method. The tool is a highly interactive and user-friendly decision support system (DSS) that effectively helps the decision maker and strategic planner to perform multi-criteria ranking of scenarios. The tool is based on state-of-the-art web technologies.

Keywords

impact scenario simulation indicator criteria decision support system multi-criteria-analysis disaster preparedness strategic planning 

References

  1. 1.
    Zuccaro, G., Cacace, F.: Seismic Casualty Evaluation: The Italian Model, an Application to the L’Aquila 2009 Event, Human Casualties in Earthquakes Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol. 29, pp. 171–184 (December 8, 2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Engelbach, W., Frings, S., Molarius, R., Aubrecht, C., Meriste, M., Perrels, A.: Indicators to compare simulated crisis management strategies. In: 5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC Davos (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Zygowicz, W.: Key Performance Indicators in EMS, http://www.usfa.fema.gov/pdf/efop/efo44984.pdf
  5. 5.
    Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability; A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman & Co., New York ©1990ISBN:0716710455Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yager, R.R.: On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 18(1), 183–190 (1988)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heikkilä, A.-M., Molarius, R., Rosqvist, T., Perrels, A.: Minimising the outcome of disasters by simulating the effects of different actions. In: The Second Nordic International Conference on Climate Change Adaptation, pp. 29–31 (August 2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Steuer, R.E.: Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application. John Wiley, New York (1986)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dujmović, J.: Properties of Local Andness/Orness. In: Castillo, O., Melin, P., Ross, O.M., Cruz, R.S., Pedrycz, W., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.) Theoretical Advances and Applications of Fuzzy Logic and Soft Computing. AISC, vol. 42, pp. 54–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yager, R.R.: Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 11–49 (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zuccaro, G., Filomena, P.: Multi-criteria analysis in vulnerability assessment. Second Egyptian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Aswan, Egypt (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Dihé, P., Denzer, R., Polese, M., Heikkilä, A., Havlik, D., Sautter, J., Hell, T., Schlobinski, S., Zuccaro, G., Engelbach, W.: An architecture for integrated crisis management simulation. In: 20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM 2013), Adelaide, South Australia, December 1-6 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sascha Schlobinski
    • 1
  • Giulio Zuccaro
    • 3
  • Martin Scholl
    • 1
  • Daniel Meiers
    • 1
  • Ralf Denzer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sergio Guarino
    • 3
  • Wolf Engelbach
    • 4
  • Kuldar Taveter
    • 5
  • Steven Frysinger
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Cismet GmbHSaarbrückenGermany
  2. 2.Environmental Informatics GroupSaarbrückenGermany
  3. 3.CENTRO STUDI PLINIUSNapoliItaly
  4. 4.Fraunhofer IAOStuttgartGermany
  5. 5.Tallinn University of TechnologyTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations