Forest Stewardship Council: Transforming the Global Forestry Sector

  • Amparo Arellano Gil
  • Thomas Colonna
  • John Hontelez
  • Marion KarmannEmail author
  • Anakarina Pérez Oropeza
Part of the Natural Resource Management in Transition book series (NRMT, volume 2)


This chapter aims to discuss the role, means and success of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) system in transforming the global forestry sector.


  1. Abbott KW, Snidal D (2008) The governance triangle: regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state. In: Mattli W, Woods N (eds) The politics of global regulation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 44–88Google Scholar
  2. Auld G, Gulbrandsen LH (2013) Private regulation in Global Environmental Governance. In: Falkner R (ed) The handbook of global climate and environment policy. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp 394–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auld G, Gulbrandsen LH, McDermott CL (2008) Certification schemes and the impacts on forests and forestry. Ann Rev Environ Resour 33:187–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Auld G, Renckens S, Cashore B (2015) Transnational private governance between the logics of empowerment and control. Regul Gov 9(2):108–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartley T (2007) Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: the rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. Am J Sociol 113(2):297–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernstein S, Cashore B (2007) Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework. Regul Gov 1(4):347–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown E, Dudley N, Lindhe A, Muhtaman DR, Stewart C, Synnott T (eds) (2013) Common guidance for the identification of High Conservation Values. HCV Resource Network, Oxford. Accessed 31 Jan 2019Google Scholar
  8. Cashore B, Auld G, Newsom D (2004) Governing through markets: forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  9. Cerutti PO, Lescuyer G, Tacconi L, Eba’a Atyi R, Essiane E, Nasi R, Tabi Eckebil PP, Tsanga R (2016) Social impacts of the Forest Stewardship Council certification in the Congo basin. Int For Rev 19(S2):50–63Google Scholar
  10. Dingwerth K, Pattberg P (2009) World politics and organizational fields: the case of transnational sustainability governance. Eur J Int Relat 15(4):707–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dodds F (2015) Multi-stakeholder partnerships: making them work for the post-2015 development agenda. Independent study commissioned by United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA). Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  12. Dos Santos MAO, Svensson G, Padin C (2014) A “fivefold bottom line” approach of implementing and reporting corporate efforts in sustainable business practices. Manag Environ Qual Int J 25(4):421–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Florestal A (2012) A princesa dos anfíbios. Altri Florestal blogue. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  14. Florestal A (2013) Atividade Pé na Terra - Charcos com Vida. Altri Florestal blogue. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  15. FSC – Forest Stewardship Council (2012) FSC Dispute Resolution System. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  16. FSC – Forest Stewardship Council (2015) Newsroom: the global volume and market share of FSC-certified timber. Accessed 31 Jul 2018
  17. FSC – Forest Stewardship Council (2015a) FSC principles and criteria for Forest Stewardship. FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2 EN, 22 July 2015. FSC International Secretariat, Bonn. Accessed 31 Jan 2019Google Scholar
  18. FSC – Forest Stewardship Council (2015b) Forest Stewardship Council Global Strategic Plan 2015–2020. FSC International, Bonn. Accessed 31 Jan 2019Google Scholar
  19. FSC – Forest Stewardship Council (2016a) Forest, climate change, and the Forest Stewardship Council. FSC AC, Oaxaca. Accessed 31 Jan 2019Google Scholar
  20. FSC – Forest Stewardship Council (2016b) FSC: a tool to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  21. Karmann M, Miettinen P, Hontelez J (2016) Forest Stewardship Council indicators: development by multi-stakeholder process assures consistency and diversity. In: Castka P, Leaman D (eds) Certification and biodiversity – how voluntary certification standards impact biodiversity and human livelihoods. Policy Matters, Issue 21. IUCN Commission on Environmental, Economic and Social Policy (CEESP) and International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), Gland, pp 125–138Google Scholar
  22. Mena S, Palazzo G (2012) Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives. Bus Ethics Q 22(3):527–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Newsom D, Hewitt D (2005) The global impacts of smartwood certification: final report. TREES Program, Rainforest Alliance. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  24. Panwar R, Kozak R, Hansen E (2016) Forests, business and sustainability. The Earthscan Forest Library. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Peña-Claros M, Blommerde S, Bongers F (2009) Assessing the progress made: an evaluation of forest management certification in the tropics. Tropical resource management papers 95. Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen. Accessed 31 Jan 2019Google Scholar
  26. Scherer AG, Palazzo G, Baumann D (2006) Global rules and private actors: toward a new role of the Transnational Corporation in Global Governance. Bus Ethics Q 16(4):505–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. UNECE – United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2015) Forest products annual market review 2014–2015. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  28. WWF (2015) WWF Forest Certification Assessment Tool (CAT). Accessed 31 Jan 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amparo Arellano Gil
    • 1
  • Thomas Colonna
    • 1
  • John Hontelez
    • 1
  • Marion Karmann
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anakarina Pérez Oropeza
    • 1
  1. 1.FSC InternationalBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations