Active and Passive Crowdsourcing in Government

  • Euripidis LoukisEmail author
  • Yannis Charalabidis
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 10)


Crowdsourcing ideas have been developed and initially applied in the private sector, first in the creative and design industries, and subsequently in many other industries, aiming to exploit the ‘collective wisdom’ in order to perform difficult problem solving and design activities. It was much later that government agencies started experimenting with crowdsourcing, aiming to collect from citizens information, knowledge, opinions and ideas concerning difficult social problems, and important public policies they were designing for addressing them. Therefore, it is necessary to develop approaches, and knowledge in general concerning the efficient and effective application of crowdsourcing ideas in government, taking into account its special needs and specificities. This chapter contributes to filling this research gap, by presenting two novel approaches in this direction, which have been developed through extensive previous relevant research of the authors: a first one for ‘active crowdsourcing’, and a second one for ‘passive crowdsourcing’ by government agencies. Both of them are based on innovative ways of using the recently emerged and highly popular Web 2.0 social media in a highly automated manner through their application programming interfaces (API). For each of these approaches, the basic idea is initially described, followed by the architecture of the required information and communications technology (ICT) infrastructure, and finally a process model for its practical application.


Crowdsourcing Citizensourcing Public policy Web 2.0 Social media E-participation E-governance 


  1. Bilidas D, Theologou M, Karkaletsis V (2007) Enriching OWL ontologies with linguistic and user-related annotations: the ELEON system. Proceedings of IEEE international conference on tools with artificial intelligence (ICTAI-07), Patras, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  2. Brabham DC (2008) Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving an introduction and cases. Convergence: Int J Res New Media Tech 14(1):75–90Google Scholar
  3. Brabham DC (2009) Moving the crowd at threadless—motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. Inf Commun Soc 13(8):1122–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brabham DC (2012) Crowdsourcing: a model for leveraging online communities. In: Delwiche A, Henderson J (eds) The Routledge handbook of participative cultures. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Charalabidis Y, Loukis E (2012) Participative public policy making through multiple social media platforms utilization. Int J Electron Gov Res 8(3):78–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charalabidis Y, Loukis E, Androutsopoulou A (2011) Enhancing participative policy making through simulation modelling—a state of the art review. Proceedings of the European Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (EMCIS) 2011, Athens, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  7. Charalabidis Y, Loukis E, Androutsopoulou A (2014a) Fostering social innovation through multiple social media combination. Inf Syst Manage 31(3):225–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charalabidis Y, Loukis E, Androutsopoulou A, Karkaletsis V, Triantafillou A (2014b) Passive crowdsourcing in government using social media. Transform Gov: People Process Policy 8(2):283–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conklin J (2003) Dialog mapping: reflections on an industrial strength case study. In: Kirschner P, Shum SB, Carr C (eds) Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Conklin J, Begeman M (1989) gIBIS: a tool for all reasons. J Am Soc Inf Sci 40(3):200–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Executive Office of the President (2009) Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies: Open Government Directive. Accessed 14 July 2014
  12. Ferro E, Loukis E, Charalabidis Y, Osella M (2013) Policy making 2.0: from theory to practice. Gov Inf Quart 30(4):359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geiger D, Rosemann M, Fielt Er, and Schader M (2012). Crowdsourcing information systems—definition typology, and design. Proceedings of international conference on information systems (ICIS) 2012, Orlando, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. Giannakopoulos G, Karkaletsis V (2009) N-gram graphs: representing documents and document sets in summary system evaluation. Proceedings of text analysis conference TAC 2009.Text analysis conference (TAC) 2009, November 16–17, 2009, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USAGoogle Scholar
  15. Giannakopoulos G, Karkaletsis V, Vouros G, Stamatopoulos P (2008) Summarization system evaluation revisited: N-gram graphs. ACM Trans Speech Lang Process 5(3):1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hetmank L (2013) Components and functions of crowdsourcing systems—a systematic literature review. Wirtschaftsinformatik Proceedings 2013Google Scholar
  17. Hilgers D, Ihl C (2010) Citizensourcing: applying the concept of open innovation to the public sector. Int J Public Participation 4(1):67–88Google Scholar
  18. Howe J (2006) The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired 14(6). Accessed 14 July 2014
  19. Howe J (2008) Crowdsourcing, why the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. Crown Business, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Keim DA, Kohlhammer J, Ellis GP, Mansmann F (2010) Mastering the information age—solving problems with visual analytics. Eurographics, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  21. Konstantopoulos S, Karkaletsis V, Vogiatzis V, Bilidas D (2011) Authoring semantic and linguistic knowledge for the dynamic generation of personalized descriptions. In: Sporleder C et al (eds) Language technology for cultural heritage. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  22. Kunz W, Rittel H (1979) Issues as elements of information systems. Working Paper No 131. University of California, BerkleyGoogle Scholar
  23. Levy P (1997) Collective intelligence: mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Lukensmeyer CJ, Torres LH (2008) Citizensourcing: citizen participation in a networked nation. In: Yang K, Bergrud E (eds) Civic engagement in a network society. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, pp 207–233Google Scholar
  25. Loukis E, Wimmer M (2012) A multi-method evaluation of different models of structured electronic consultation on government policies. Inf Syst Manage 29(4):284–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Majchrzak A, Malhotra A (2013) Towards an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation. J Strategic Inf Syst 22:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maragoudakis M, Loukis E, Charalabidis Y (2011) A review of opinion mining methods for analyzing citizens’ contributions in public policy debate. Proceedings of IFIP 3rd international conference on e-participation—ePart 2011, August 29–September 1, 2011, Delft, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  28. Nam T (2012) Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via government 2.0. Gov Inf Quart 29:12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pedersen J, Kocsis D, Tripathi A, Tarrell A, Weerakoon A, Tahmasbi N, Xiong J, Deng W, Oh O, Vreede GJd. (2013) Conceptual foundations of crowdsourcing: a review of IS research. Proceedings of the 46th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Maui, HI, USA.Google Scholar
  30. Rentoumi V, Giannakopoulos G, Karkaletsis V, Vouros G (2009) Sentiment analysis of figurative language using a word sense disambiguation approach. Proceedings of RANLP 2009Google Scholar
  31. Rentoumi V, Petrakis S, Karkaletsis V, Vouros G (2010) A collaborative system for sentiment analysis. Proceedings of SETN 2010.Google Scholar
  32. Rouse AC (2010) A preliminary taxonomy of crowdsourcing. Proceedings of the Austalasian conference on information systems (ACIS) 2010, Paper 76.Google Scholar
  33. Rittel HWJ, Weber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4(2):155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stewart O, Huerta J, Sader M (2009) Designing crowdsourcing community for the enterprise. Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD workshop on human computation, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  35. Surowiecki J (2004) The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Tarrell A, Tahmasbi N, Kocsis D, Tripathi A, Pedersen J, Xiong J, Oh O, Vreede GJd (2013) Crowdsourcing: A snapshot of published research. Proceedings of the nineteenth Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS) 2013, Chicago, Illinois, USAGoogle Scholar
  37. Thomas J, Cook K (eds) (2005) Illuminating the path: research and development agenda for visual analytics. IEEE, Los AlamitosGoogle Scholar
  38. Wong PC, Thomas J (2004) Visual analytics. IEEE Comput Gr Appl 24(5):20–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhao Y, Zhu Q (2012) Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: current status and future direction. Inf Syst Frontier 16(3):417–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ziegler CN, Skubacz M (2006) Towards automated reputation and brand monitoring on the web. Proceedings of IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on Web intelligence 2006, Hong KongGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the AegeanSamosGreece

Personalised recommendations