Advertisement

Introduction to Policy-Making in the Digital Age

  • Marijn JanssenEmail author
  • Maria A. Wimmer
Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 10)

Abstract

The explosive growth in data, computational power, and social media creates new opportunities for innovating governance and policy-making. These These information and communications technology (ICT) developments affect all parts of the policy-making cycle and result in drastic changes in the way policies are developed. To take advantage of these developments in the digital world, new approaches, concepts, instruments and methods are needed, which are able to deal with societal complexity and uncertainty. This field of research is sometimes depicted as e-government policy, e-policy, policy informatics or data science. Advancing our knowledge demands that different scientific communities collaborate to create practice-driven knowledge. For policy-making in the digital age disciplines such as complex systems, social simulation and public administration need to be combined.

Keywords

e-policy Policy-making Data science Policy informatics Big data Open data Data science Simulation Gaming 

References

  1. Banks J (1998) Handbook of simulation: principles, methodology, advances, applications, and practice. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertot JC, Jaeger PT, Hansen D (2012) The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Gov Inform Q 29:30–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burt E (2011) Introduction to the freedom of information special edition: emerging perspectives, critical reflections, and the need for further research. Inform Polit 16(2):91–92.Google Scholar
  4. Coleman S, Moss G (2008) Governing at a distance—politicians in the blogosphere. Inform Polit 12(1–2):7–20.Google Scholar
  5. Davenport TH, Patil DJ (2012) Data scientist: the sexiest job of the 21st century. Harv Bus Rev 90(10):70–76Google Scholar
  6. Dawes SS, Janssen M (2013) Policy informatics: addressing complex problems with rich data, computational tools, and stakeholder engagement. Paper presented at the 14th annual international conference on digital government research, Quebec City, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  7. De Reuver M, Stein S, Hampe F (2013) From eparticipation to mobile participation: designing a service platform and business model for mobile participation. Inform Polit 18(1):57–73Google Scholar
  8. European_Commission (2003) Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/rules/eu/index_en.htm. Accessed 12 Dec 2012
  9. Janssen M, Estevez E (2013) Lean government and platform-based governance—doing more with less. Gov Inform Quert 30(suppl 1):S1–S8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Janssen M, Charalabidis Y, Zuiderwijk A (2012) Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Inform Syst Manage 29(4):258–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Janssen M, Estevez E, Janowski T (2014) Interoperability in big, open, and linked data—organizational maturity, capabilities, and data portfolios. Computer 47(10):26–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jørgensen TB, Bozeman B (2007) Public values: an inventory. Adm Soc 39(3):354–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koliba C, Zia A (2012) Governance Informatics: using computer simulation models to deepen situational awareness and governance design considerations policy informatics. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Krishnamurthy R, Bhagwatwar A, Johnston EW, Desouza KC (2013) A glimpse into policy informatics: the case of participatory platforms that generate synthetic empathy. Commun Assoc Inform Syst 33(Article 21):365–380.Google Scholar
  15. Law AM, Kelton WD (1991) Simulation modeling and analysis 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Moore MH (1995) Creating public value: strategic management in government. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Obama B (2009) Memorandum for the Heads of executive Departments and Agencies: transparency and open government. Retrieved February 21, 2013, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Transparency_and_Open_Government
  18. Pidd M (1992) Computer simulation in management science, 3rd ed. John Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  19. Slaviero C, Maciel C, Alencar F, Santana E, Souza P (2010) Designing a platform to facilitate the development of virtual e-participation environments. Paper presented at the ICEGOV ’10 proceedings of the 4th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  20. Stewart JJ, Hedge DM, Lester JP (2007) Public policy: an evolutionary approach 3rd edn. Cengage LearningGoogle Scholar
  21. Stoker G (2006) Public value management: a new narrative for networked governance? Am Rev Public Adm 3(1):41–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Surowiecki J (2004) The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business economies, societies and nations. DoubledayGoogle Scholar
  23. Welch EW (2012) The rise of participative technologies in government. In: Shareef MA, Archer N, Dwivedi YK, Mishra A, Pandey SK (eds) Transformational government through eGov practice: socioeconomic, cultural, and technological issues. Emerald Group Publishing LimitedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wimmer MA, Furdik K, Bicking M, Mach M, Sabol T, Butka P (2012a) Open collaboration in policy development: concept and architecture to integrate scenario development and formal policy modelling. In: Charalabidis Y, Koussouris S (eds) Empowering open and collaborative governance. Technologies and methods for online citizen engagement in public policy making. Springer, Berlin, pp 199–219Google Scholar
  25. Wimmer MA, Scherer S, Moss S, Bicking M (2012b) Method and tools to support stakeholder engagement in policy development the OCOPOMO project. Int J Electron Gov Res (IJEGR) 8(3):98–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zuiderwijk A, Janssen M (2013) A coordination theory perspective to improve the use of open data in policy-making. Paper presented at the 12th conference on Electronic Government (EGOV), KoblenzGoogle Scholar
  27. Zuiderwijk A, Helbig N, Gil-García JR, Janssen M (2014) Innovation through open data—a review of the state-of-the-art and an emerging research agenda. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res 9(2):I–XIII.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Technology, Policy, and ManagementDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.University of Koblenz-LandauKoblenzGermany

Personalised recommendations