Real-Time Muscle Deformation via Decoupled Modeling of Solid and Muscle Fiber Mechanics

  • Yacine Berranen
  • Mitsuhiro Hayashibe
  • David Guiraud
  • Benjamin Gilles
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8674)


This paper presents a novel approach for simulating 3D muscle deformations with complex architectures. The approach consists in choosing the best model formulation in terms of computation cost and accuracy, that mixes a volumetric tissue model based on finite element method (3D FEM), a muscle fiber model (Hill contractile 1D element) and a membrane model accounting for aponeurosis tissue (2D FEM). The separate models are mechanically binded using barycentric embeddings. Our approach allows the computation of several fiber directions in one coarse finite element, and thus, strongly decreases the required finite element resolution to predict muscle deformation during contraction. Using surface registration, fibers tracks of specific architecture can be transferred from a template to subject morphology, and then simulated. As a case study, three different architectures are simulated and compared to their equivalent one dimensional Hill wire model simulations.


Finite Element Method Biceps Brachii Pennation Angle Muscle Model Muscle Architecture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Hoy, M.G., Zajac, F.E., Gordon, M.E.: A musculoskeletal model of the human lower extremity: The effect of muscle, tendon, and moment arm on the moment angle relationship of musculotendon actuators at the hip, knee, and ankle. J. Biomech. 23(2), 157–169 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Delp, S.L., Anderson, F.C., Arnold, A.S., Loan, P., Habib, A., John, C.T., Guendelman, E., Thelen, D.G.: OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans. on Bio-Medical Engineering 54(11), 1940–1950 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blemker, S.S., Delp, S.L.: Three-Dimensional Representation of Complex Muscle Architectures and Geometries. Annals of Biomed. Eng. 33(5), 661–673 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johansson, T., Meier, P., Blickhan, R.: A finite-element model for the mechanical analysis of skeletal muscles. J. of Theoretical Biology 206(1), 131–149 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oomens, C.W.J., Maenhout, M., van Oijen, C.H., Drost, M.R., Baaijens, F.P.: Finite element modelling of contracting skeletal muscle. Philosophical Trans. of the Royal Society of London 358(1437), 1453–1460 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blemker, S.S., Pinsky, P.M., Delp, S.L.: A 3D model of muscle reveals the causes of nonuniform strains in the biceps brachii. J. Biomech. 38(4), 657–665 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hodgson, J.A., Chi, S.-W., Yang, J.P., Chen, J.-S., Edgerton, V.R., Sinha, S.: Finite element modeling of passive material influence on the deformation and force output of skeletal muscle. J. of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 9, 163–183 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Faure, F., Duriez, C., Delingette, H., Allard, J., Gilles, B., Marchesseau, S., Talbot, H., Courtecuisse, H., Bousquet, G., Peterlik, I., Cotin, S.: SOFA: A Multi-Model Framework for Interactive Physical Simulation. Soft Tissue Biomechanical Modeling for Computer Assisted Surgery 11, 283–321 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hayashibe, M., Guiraud, D.: Voluntary EMG-to-force estimation with a multi-scale physiological muscle model. Biomedical Eng. Online 12(1), 86 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yacine Berranen
    • 1
  • Mitsuhiro Hayashibe
    • 1
  • David Guiraud
    • 1
  • Benjamin Gilles
    • 1
  1. 1.INRIA DEMAR ProjectLIRMM CNRS and University of Montpellier Sud de FranceFrance

Personalised recommendations