Advertisement

Group-Wise Optimization of Common Brain Landmarks with Joint Structural and Functional Regulations

  • Dajiang Zhu
  • Jinglei Lv
  • Hanbo Chen
  • Tianming Liu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8674)

Abstract

An unrelenting human quest regarding the brain science is: what is the intrinsic relationship between the brain’s structural and functional architectures, which partly defines what we are and who we are. Recent studies suggest that each brain’s cytoarchitectonic region has a unique set of extrinsic inputs and outputs, named as “connectional fingerprint”, which largely determines the functions that each brain area performs. However, their explicit connections are largely unknown. For example, in what extent they are inclined to be coherent with each other and otherwise they will intend to show more heterogeneity? In this work, based on a widely used brain structural atlas which represents the most consistent structural connectome across different populations, we proposed a novel group-wise optimization framework to computationally model the functional homogeneity behind them. The optimization procedure is conducted under the joint structural and functional regulations and therefore the achieved common brain landmarks reflect the consistency of brain structure and function simultaneously. The Human Connectome Project (HCP) Q1 dataset, which includes 68 subjects with high quality imaging data, was used as test bed and the results imply that there exists extraordinary accordance between brain structural and functional architectures.

Keywords

optimization sparse coding fMRI brain structure and function 

References

  1. 1.
    Passingham, R.E., Stephan, K.E., Kotter, R.: The anatomical basis of functional localization in the cortex. Nature Review Neuroscience 3(8), 606–616 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Honey, C.J., et al.: Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(6), 2035–2040 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bowman, F.D., et al.: Determining functional connectivity using fMRI data with diffusion-based anatomical weighting. NeuroImage 62, 1769–1779 (2012)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O’Donnell, L.J., et al.: fMRI-DTI modeling via landmark distance atlases for prediction and detection of fiber tracts. NeuroImage 60, 456–470 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhu, D., et al.: Fusing DTI and FMRI Data: A Survey of Methods and Applications. NeuroImage (2013), doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.071Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhu, D., et al.: DICCCOL: Dense Individualized and Common Connectivity-based Cortical Landmarks. Cerebral Cortex 23(4), 786–800 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lv, J., et al.: Identifying functional networks via sparse representation of whole-brain fMRI signals. In: IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, pp. 778–781 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barch, D.M., et al.: Function in the human connectome: task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior. Neuroimage 80, 15, 169–189 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith, et al.: Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage 80, 144–168 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mairal, J., Bach, F., Ponce, J., Sapiro, G.: Online learning for matrix factorization and sparse coding. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 11, 19–60 (2010)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duncan, J.: The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: Mental programs for intelligent behaviour. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14(4), 172–179 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith, S.M., et al.: Correspondence of the brain’s functional architecture during activation and rest. PNAS 106, 13040–13045 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Varoquaux, G., Schwartz, Y., Pinel, P., Thirion, B.: Cohort-level brain mapping: learning cognitive atoms to single out specialized regions. In: Gee, J.C., Joshi, S., Pohl, K.M., Wells, W.M., Zöllei, L. (eds.) IPMI 2013. LNCS, vol. 7917, pp. 438–449. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dajiang Zhu
    • 1
  • Jinglei Lv
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hanbo Chen
    • 1
  • Tianming Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.Cortical Architecture Imaging and Discovery Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Bioimaging Research CenterThe University of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.School of AutomationNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations