Advertisement

Tumor Growth Prediction with Hyperelastic Biomechanical Model, Physiological Data Fusion, and Nonlinear Optimization

  • Ken C. L. Wong
  • Ronald Summers
  • Electron Kebebew
  • Jianhua Yao
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8674)

Abstract

Tumor growth prediction is usually achieved by physiological modeling and model personalization from clinical measurements. Although image-based frameworks have been proposed with promising results, different issues such as infinitesimal strain assumption, complicated optimization procedures, and lack of functional information, may limit the prediction performance. Therefore, we propose a framework which comprises a hyperelastic biomechanical model for better physiological plausibility, gradient-free nonlinear optimization for more flexible choices of models and objective functions, and physiological data fusion of structural and functional images for better subject-specificity. Experiments were performed on synthetic and clinical data to verify parameter estimation capability and prediction performance of the framework. Comparisons of using different biomechanical models and objective functions were also performed. From the experimental results on eight patient data sets, the recall, precision, and relative volume difference (RVD) between predicted and measured tumor volumes are 84.85±6.15%, 87.08±7.83%, and 13.81±6.64% respectively.

Keywords

Prediction Performance Synthetic Data Biomechanical Model Measure Tumor Volume Tumor Growth Modeling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Bae, K.T.: Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology 256(1), 32–61 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bathe, K.J.: Finite Element Procedures. Prentice Hall (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, X., Summers, R.M., Yao, J.: Kidney tumor growth prediction by coupling reaction-diffusion and biomechanical model. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 60(1), 169–173 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clatz, O., Sermesant, M., Bondiau, P.Y., Delingette, H., Warfield, S.K., Malandain, G., Ayache, N.: Realistic simulation of the 3D growth of brain tumors in MR images coupling diffusion with biomechanical deformation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 24(10), 1334–1346 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fung, Y.C.: Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, 2nd edn. Springer (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hogea, C., Davatzikos, C., Biros, G.: An image-driven parameter estimation problem for a reaction-diffusion glioma growth model with mass effects. Journal of Mathematical Biology 56(6), 793–825 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holzapfel, G.A.: Nonlinear Solid Mechanics: A Continuum Approach for Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kormano, M., Dean, P.B.: Extravascular contrast material: the major component of contrast enhancement. Radiology 121(2), 379–382 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu, Y., Sadowski, S.M., Weisbrod, A.B., Kebebew, E., Summers, R.M., Yao, J.: Multimodal image driven patient specific tumor growth modeling. In: Mori, K., Sakuma, I., Sato, Y., Barillot, C., Navab, N. (eds.) MICCAI 2013, Part III. LNCS, vol. 8151, pp. 283–290. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rowan, T.: Functional Stability Analysis of Numerical Algorithms. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin (1990)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stylianopoulos, T., Martin, J.D., Chauhan, V.P., Jain, S.R., Diop-Frimpong, B., Bardeesy, N., Smith, B.L., Ferrone, C.R., Hornicek, F.J., Boucher, Y., Munn, L.L., Jain, R.K.: Causes, consequences, and remedies for growth-induced solid stress in murine and human tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(38), 15101–15108 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    West, G.B., Brown, J.H., Enquist, B.J.: A general model for ontogenetic growth. Nature 413(6856), 628–631 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ken C. L. Wong
    • 1
  • Ronald Summers
    • 1
  • Electron Kebebew
    • 2
  • Jianhua Yao
    • 1
  1. 1.Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical CenterNIHBethesdaUSA
  2. 2.Endocrine Oncology Branch, National Cancer InstituteNIHBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations