Advertisement

T2-Relaxometry for Myelin Water Fraction Extraction Using Wald Distribution and Extended Phase Graph

  • Alireza Akhondi-Asl
  • Onur Afacan
  • Robert V. Mulkern
  • Simon K. Warfield
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8675)

Abstract

Quantitative assessment of myelin density in the white matter is an emerging tool for neurodegenerative disease related studies such as multiple sclerosis and Schizophrenia. For the last two decades, T 2 relaxometry based on multi-exponential fitting to a single slice multi-echo sequence has been the most common MRI technique for myelin water fraction (MWF) mapping, where the short T 2 is associated with myelin water. However, modeling the spectrum of the relaxations as the sum of large number of impulse functions with unknown amplitudes makes the accuracy and robustness of the estimated MWF’s questionable. In this paper, we introduce a novel model with small number of parameters to simultaneously characterize transverse relaxation rate spectrum and B 1 inhomogeneity at each voxel. We use mixture of three Wald distributions with unknown mixture weights, mean and shape parameters to represent the distribution of the relative amount of water in between myelin sheets, tissue water, and cerebrospinal fluid. The parameters of the model are estimated using the variable projection method and are used to extract the MWF at each voxel. In addition, we use Extended Phase Graph (EPG) method to compensate for the stimulated echoes caused by B 1 inhomogeneity. To validate our model, synthetic and real brain experiments were conducted where we have compared our novel algorithm with the non-negative least squares (NNLS) as the state-of-the-art technique in the literature. Our results indicate that we can estimate MWF map with substantially higher accuracy as compared to the NNLS method.

Keywords

T2 Relaxometry MWF EPG Wald Variable projection 

References

  1. 1.
    Nave, K.A.: Myelination and support of axonal integrity by glia. Nature 468(7321), 244–252 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kolind, S.H., Madler, B., Fischer, S., Li, D.K., MacKay, A.L.: Myelin water imaging: implementation and development at 3.0 T and comparison to 1.5 T measurements. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 62(1), 106–115 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Whittall, K.P., MacKay, A.L.: Quantitative interpretation of NMR relaxation data. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 84(1), 134–152 (1969, 1989)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oh, J., Han, E.T., Lee, M.C., Nelson, S.J., Pelletier, D.: Multislice brain myelin water fractions at 3T in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neuroimaging 17(2), 156–163 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mackay, A., Whittall, K., Adler, J., Li, D., Paty, D., Graeb, D.: In vivo visualization of myelin water in brain by magnetic resonance. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 31(6), 673–677 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prasloski, T., Rauscher, A., MacKay, A.L., Hodgson, M., Vavasour, I.M., Laule, C., Mädler, B.: Rapid whole cerebrum myelin water imaging using a 3D GRASE sequence. Neuroimage (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hennig, J.: Echoes-how to generate, recognize, use or avoid them in MR-imaging sequences. part I: Fundamental and not so fundamental properties of spin echoes. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance 3(3), 125–143 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seshadri, V.: The inverse Gaussian distribution: a case study in exponential families. Clarendon Press Oxford (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    O’Leary, D.P., Rust, B.W.: Variable projection for nonlinear least squares problems. Computational Optimization and Applications, 1–15 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Golub, G., Pereyra, V.: Separable nonlinear least squares: the variable projection method and its applications. Inverse Problems 19(2), R1 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alireza Akhondi-Asl
    • 1
  • Onur Afacan
    • 1
  • Robert V. Mulkern
    • 1
  • Simon K. Warfield
    • 1
  1. 1.Computational Radiology LaboratoryBoston Children’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations