Advertisement

Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy with Colonic Interposition

  • Christopher Armstrong
  • Monica T. Young
  • Ninh T. NguyenEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Minimally invasive esophagectomy has become increasingly utilized as an alternative to open esophagectomy. Although the stomach is the preferred conduit for esophageal reconstruction, the colon can be used as an alternative when a gastric conduit is not feasible. We describe our surgical technique for a laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with colonic interposition. The esophagocolic anastomosis can be constructed with a circular stapler or a hand-sewn approach.

Keywords

Distal Esophagus Esophageal Resection Invasive Esophagectomy Open Esophagectomy Colonic Interposition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

Video 14.1

Creation of a thoracoscopic esophagocolonic anastomosis during colonic interposition (WMV 44944 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Kim T, et al. Review of minimally invasive esophagectomy and current controversies. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:683213.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nguyen NT, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg. 2008;248:1081–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DeMeester SR. Colon interposition following esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2001;14:169–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis PA, Law S, Wong J. Colonic interposition after esophagectomy for cancer. Arch Surg. 2003;138:303–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luketich JD, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256:95–103.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lazzarino AI, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England. Ann Surg. 2010;252:292–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nguyen TN, et al. Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with colonic interposition. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:2120–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Isolauri J, Markkula H, Autio V. Colon interposition in the treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;43:420–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilkins Jr EW. Long-segment colon substitution for the esophagus. Ann Surg. 1980;192:722.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    DeMeester TR, et al. Indications, surgical technique, and long-term functional results of colon interposition or bypass. Ann Surg. 1988;208:460–74.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cerfolio RJ, Allen MS, Deschamps C, Trastek VF, Pairolero PC. Esophageal replacement by colon interposition. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59:1382–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mansour KA, Bryan FC, Carlson GW. Bowel interposition for esophageal replacement: twenty-five – year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64:752–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thomas P, Fuentes P, Giudicelli R, Reboud E. Colon interposition for esophageal replacement: current indications and long-term function. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64:757–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kolh P, et al. Early stage results after oesophageal resection for malignancy—colon interposition vs. gastric pull-up. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;18:293–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Peters JH, Chandrasoma P, DeMeester TR. Curative resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma: analysis of 100 en bloc esophagectomies. Ann Surg. 2001;234:520–30; discussion 530–1.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Popovici Z. A new philosophy in esophageal reconstruction with colon. Thirty-years experience. Dis Esophagus. 2003;16:323–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Knez̆ević JD, et al. Colon interposition in the treatment of esophageal caustic strictures: 40 years of experience. Dis Esophagus. 2007;20:530–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Motoyama S, et al. Surgical outcome of colon interposition by the posterior mediastinal route for thoracic esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1273–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Klink CD, Binnebösel M, Schneider M, Ophoff K. Operative outcome of colon interposition in the treatment of esophageal cancer: a 20-year experience. Surgery. 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.045.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hamai Y, Hihara J, Emi M, Aoki Y, Okada M. Esophageal reconstruction using the terminal ileum and right colon in esophageal cancer surgery. Surg Today. 2012;42:342–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Biere SS, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Chir. 2009;64:121–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Biere SS, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yasuda T, Shiozaki H. Esophageal reconstruction with colon tissue. Surg Today. 2011;41(6):745–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Armstrong
    • 1
  • Monica T. Young
    • 2
  • Ninh T. Nguyen
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, Rockyview General Hospital and South Health CampusUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Department of General SurgeryUniversity of California Irvine Medical CenterOrangeUSA
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryUniversity of California Irvine Medical CenterOrangeUSA

Personalised recommendations