Advertisement

Pederin, Psymberin and the Structurally Related Mycalamides: Synthetic Aspects and Biological Activities

  • Zbigniew J. WitczakEmail author
  • Ajay Bommareddy
  • Adam L. VanWert
Chapter
  • 2k Downloads

Abstract

Pederin, psymberin, and mycalamides are related members of a relatively new family of potent natural antiviral and antitumor compounds originally isolated from marine sponges in 1988. This natural family of chemicals is of great interest to medicinal chemists and biologists, stemming from its extremely low abundance in source organisms and strikingly potent biological activity. They have clearly emerged as promising new synthetic targets, and are the focus of quite an interdisciplinary approach to molecular characterization. In this chapter we review diverse synthetic approaches to this family of natural products that has been demonstrating remarkable biological activity. We discuss relevant history, biological origins with the latest information on source organisms and their hosts, in-depth synthetic approaches, and biological data supporting their potential as therapeutic compounds.

Keywords

Mycalamides Psymberin Psympederin Irciniastatin A Pederin Onnamide Marine Natural products Anticancer activity Antineoplastic Marine sponge Paederus fuscipes Polyketides PC3 Hela T98G KM12 

32.1 Introduction

In 1988, an extract from the sponge genus Mycale in New Zealand’s Otago Harbour yielded a small quantity of brown oil (307 mg from 200 g of sponge) whose bioactive components exhibited the unusual ring system which is now known as the mycalamides [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. Structurally, mycalamides A and B are remarkably similar to the insect toxin pederin, and exhibit potent and comparable cytotoxicity and antitumor activity.

Despite their production in highly distinct species, the commonalities between these mycalamides , pederin [8], and the subsequently discovered onnamide A , an antiviral compound from a Japanese sponge [9], indicate that they likely have related modes of biosynthesis . Pederin is found in some beetles, e.g., Paederus fuscipes , and structurally is considered a polyketide that bears vesicant and potent antitumor properties. Although pederin has weak antibacterial properties, it is severely toxic to eukaryotic cells. This property likely stems from its ability to block protein synthesis and cell division. There is significant evidence indicating that pederin is synthesized by a bacterial symbiont of host beetles, perhaps a close relative to P. aeruginosa [10]. This finding raises the possibility of culturing bacteria to generate a large quantity of pederin for therapeutic use or chemical modification to enhance pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics. Currently, however, isolating a practical quantity of pederin from biological sources remains challenging. Approximately 220 lb, or 25 million insects, were needed to extract enough pederin for structural analysis (Scheme 32.1).

Scheme 32.1

Pederin, psymberin, and psypederin and structurally related mycalamides, onannamide

Comprehensive characterization of the pharmacodynamic, toxicological, and therapeutic potential of all these congeners has been limited by their paucity. Therefore, alternative and practical synthetic approaches should prove to be highly useful for this remarkably potent set of compounds. Developing new and efficient synthetic strategies should facilitate the production of new lead modifications. Ideally, such derivatives of the natural compounds will have more suitable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and most importantly, tissue targeting may become a realistic goal.

32.2 Synthetic Methodologies

An account of the major synthetic strategies for producing compounds from the mycalamide, pederin, and psymberin families is presented in separate sections below. All presented methods reflect a clear mastery of modern synthesis techniques and reagents by the investigators.

32.3 Synthetic Methodologies for Mycalamides

Several synthetic strategies for producing mycalamides have been published. All proposed methods to date have been complex strategies with low yields. Adding to the complexity of these strategies is the requirement for stereospecificity at several steps. Thus, development of more efficient synthetic strategies is critical for realizing the full potential of this class of compounds .

A synthetic approach to produce the right half of mycalamides was demonstrated using Kishi’s method. This technique utilizes α-D-glucopyranoside as the starting material. In the early 1990s a multi-step sequence for developing this significant portion of the mycalamide structure was published [11, 12]. The basic synthetic strategy involves an alteration of the previously published methodology [13, 14]. The conjugation method to produce total mycalamide required the activation of pederate, the left portion of the molecule, with p-toluenesulfonyl chloride/DMAP/dichloromethane at room temperature followed by treatment with the amines produced by hydrogenation of azides. In Roush’s method, an excellent chiral precursor, methyl 7-benzoylpederate, is used to effectively control the stereoselectivity of the coupling strategy for generation of the amide bridge [15, 16, 17, 18]. An alternative approach to synthesize methyl pederic acid involves 7-O−(3,4-dimethoxybenzyl) pederate, an intermediate in Kishi’s synthesis of mycalamides A and B and onnamide A [11, 12]. Scheme 32.2 depicts this significantly diastereoselective synthesis. Incorporation of the exo methylene moiety involves use of the very important Takai-Nozaki protocol (CH2I2, TiCl4, Zn, THF).

Scheme 32.2

Roush’s synthesis of 7-O-(3,4-dimethoxybenzyl)

A strategy for producing pederic acid derivatives was employed in the synthesis of 7-epi-mycalamide [15, 16, 17, 18, 19]. One key step in the method is the mismatched aldol reaction of the imide and aldehyde. This step yielded a ca. 5:4 mixture of two isomeric aldols, with incorrect C-7 stereochemistry. Enrichment of the isomeric mixture to mycalamide A required epimerization of C-7 at the beta-keto imide step. A divergent and effective approach involves Swern style oxidation of the isomeric mixture of aldols. This approach proceeds under reaction conditions that minimize C-7 epimerization, selectively yielding 7-epi-mycalamide.

A strategy for producing (+)-methyl 7-benzoylpederate, a mycalamide intermediate, has been reported by Trotter et al. in the Nakata group [20]. This effective strategy employs the well-known Nakata’s [20] precursor, that has been utilized in similar methods, resulting in generation of the basic framework of the system. One limitation of the approach is that the conjugation strategy employs the original technique that yields an isomeric mixture of target products. These products are challenging to purify.

Stereoselectivity is a focus of Toyota’s/Ihara’s method for mycalamide synthesis. In this procedure D-mannitol is a useful chiral precursor for eventual production of the right half of the mycalamide structure. In this strategy, a Lewis-acid-catalyzed intermolecular aldol reaction and oxypalladation are critical steps [21, 22, 23, 24]. This approach yields an effectively protected right half of the mycalamide structure that is primed for functionalization and conjugation with the remaining half of the structure.

For the total synthesis of (+)-mycalamide A, Kagawa and Toyota produce an α, β-unsaturated ester from D-mannitol as described above [21]. The ester is then used to synthesize an intermediate, and the left and right portions are joined by transmethylation of the intermediate. Subsequently, conjugating the resultant vinyl anion to the ester group regioselectively via nucleophilic addition effectively produces the final precursor in 50 % yield. Modifications of the functional group of this precursor can produce (+)-mycalamide A [25].

Trost and Probst demonstrated an approach for the synthesis of (−)–mycalamide A. In this method they synthesized (−)-7-benzoylpederate (left-half of mycalamide) from (2S,3S)-2, 3-epoxybutane and the right-half of mycalamide from (R)-pantolactone [26]. A multi-step sequence was used to form a terminal azide on the right half that was suitable for conjugation with the left half, yielding the total mycalamide.

Sohn and Rawal’s approach to mycalamide A synthesis employed a convergent coupling of pederic acid (Structure A, Scheme 32.3) with mycalamine (structure B) [27].

Scheme 32.3

Rawal’s coupling approach to mycalamide A

In this approach the left portion, (+)-7-benzoylpederic acid, was produced through 7 steps with ~ 35 % overall yield. A major step in this method is the palladium (II)-catalyzed tandem Wacker/Heck cyclization reaction to form a tetrahydropyran ring (Scheme 32.3) prior to coupling to the right half of mycalamide. The right half, mycalamine (structure B), was synthesized from diethyl D-tartarate in 21 steps with 10.5 % yield. Joining of the two halves stereoselectively was accomplished via (1) DCC/DMAP catalysis with 56 % yield of mycalamide A, or (2) reaction with benzotriazol-1-yl-oxytripyrrolidinophosphonium-hexafluoro-phosphate/Diisopropyl-ethyl-amine (PyAOP/DIPEA) to produce C (10)-epi-mycalamide A (61 % yield).

32.4 Synthetic Methodologies for Pederin

From earlier years to more recent times many literature reports [13, 14, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44] describe total synthesis of pederin, precursors, or related structures. The total synthesis of pederamide, a hydrolysis product of pederin, was first reported by Tsuzuki and co-workers in 1976 [41]. Subsequently, Nakata et al. reported the first synthetic method for production of total pederin in 1985 [13, 14]. In this method they stereoselectively produced (+)-benzoylselenopederic acid via the novel reducing agent, Zn(BH4)2. Two major steps in their procedure were (1) construction of an aminal linker using a metallateddihydropyran; and (2) production of an N-acyl aminal via a rhodium-catalyzed reductive hydroboration of an acyl amine .

Kocienski’s strategy [45] for the right portion template, originally described in 1987 [28], is one of the most useful synthetic methods for efficient production of an important precursor of the whole family of mycalamides . A relatively new approach, published by Floreancig et al. [42, 43] employs the Paterson’s pinene-derived boron enolatealdol strategy. This effective strategy proceeds with a highly stereoselectivealdol reaction. This reaction is a pivotal step for ensuring appropriate orientation of bonds at C-15.

In 2007, another approach for the total synthesis of pederin was reported by Jewett and Rawal [30]. The group achieved direct coupling of the left and right halves using pederic acid chloride with the lithium anion of carbamate in a toluene/pyridine solution. This approach was highly effective. The deprotection steps to complete the approach required the use of t-butyl ammonium fluoride (TBAF) in a tetrahydrofuran solution followed by a hydrolytic quench with lithium hydroxide in methanol. This strategy resulted in formation of total pederin with a marked 88 % yield (Scheme 32.4). Various other diverse methods for the production of pederic acid esters, which serve as specific templates for coupling approaches, have also been published [37, 38, 39, 40].

Scheme 32.4

Rawal’s sysnthesis of pederin

32.5 Synthetic Methodologies for Psymberin

Psymberin was first isolated by Crews et al. in 2004 from the Marine Sponge Psammocinia using a “bioassay-guided fractionation” method [46]. Irciniastatin A, isolated by Pettit et al. in the same year from the marine sponge Ircinia ramose, was found to be identical to psymberin [47]. The amide side chain of psymberin was a focus of Williams et al. in a 2005 report [48]. Their group employed X-ray crystallography and synthetic model compounds for comparison with natural psymberin. They determined that the anti configuration of the side chain is the natural form [48]. Crews and coworkers [46] also reported assignment of absolute stereochemistry of Psymberin as 5S, 8S, 9S, 11R, 13R, 15S, 16R, 17R and with multiple NOE enhancements. Psymberin was assessed for in vitro activity against an impressive 60 human cancer cell lines [46].

Generation of psymberin stereoisomers was reported by De Brabander et al. [49]. In the following year the group reported on the synthesis of a novel compound sharing characteristics with psymberin and pederin [50]. They referred to the new compound as “psympederin” . This hybrid is depicted in Scheme 32.5, and starts with a C2-symmetrical diol that is conveniently acetylated by acid catalysis into cyclic orthoformate [50]. Hydrolysis of the monoacetate, followed by reduction with triphenylphosphine, resulted in production of a lactol with a yield of 95 %. Subsequently, the lactol intermediate was functionalized with multiple steps to the amide. In the final step of the pathway, the amide was converted into “psympederin” (Scheme 32.5) .

Scheme 32.5

De Brabander’s sysnthesis of psymberin

Several diverse methodologies for the synthesis of psymberin and functionalized congeners have been reported in the past 10 years [51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60]. Konopelski et al. and Shao and Huang et al. [51, 57], in addition to Pietruszka and co-workers [58, 59, 60], have designed methods for synthesizing new analogues of psymberin, including putative intermediates in the natural biosynthetic pathway. Pietruszka’s synthetic approach to 8-desmethoxy psymberin is depicted in Scheme 32.6.

Scheme 32.6

Pietruszka’s sysnthesis of 8-desmethoxy psymberin

32.6 Biological Activity

32.6.1 Activity of Mycalamides

Evaluation of the biological and potential therapeutic activity of this class of compounds has been difficult, stemming from their very low concentration in host organisms . Mycalamide-A exhibited promising in vivo anti-viral activity against the A59 coronavirus in mice [2]. Furthermore, mycalamides A and B and onnamide showed anti-cancer properties in vitro and in vivo in mice and human tumor cells at concentrations ranging from 5 to 200 nM and 2.5 to 10 µg/kg [61]. All three compounds were shown to inhibit protein synthesis, some at low nanomolar concentrations [61, 62]. Mycalamides A and B exhibited the ability to convert transformed rat kidney epithelial cells (NRK) back to their normal morphology, possibly through selective inhibition of protein synthesis [63]. More recently, Dyshlovoy et al. showed that mycalamide A was able to block epidermal growth factor-induced cancerous transformation of a murine epidermal cell line (JB6 Cl41 P(+)), and induce apoptosis at subnanomolar concentrations, possibly through inhibition of NF-kB and AP-1 nuclear transcription factors [64]. Richter et al. showed that synthetic congeners of mycalamide-B, i.e., 18-O-methyl mycalamide-B and 10-epi-18-O-methyl mycalamide-B, exhibited anti-proliferative effects against carcinomas [65]. Specific cell lines that demonstrate susceptibility to mycalamide A, mycalamide B, or onnamide include murine lymphoma P388 cells, HL-60, HT-29, and A549 human tumor cells, and leukemia cells [61, 62, 63, 65]. Mycalamide-A is also active against B16 melanoma, Lewis lung carcinoma, M5076 ovarian sarcoma, colon26 carcinoma, and the human MX-1, CX-1, and Burkitt’s lymphoma tumor xenografts [61].

In addition to its antitumor properties, mycalamide-A has demonstrated powerful immunosuppressive action, with a potency at inhibiting CD4+ T cells of approximately 1000 times that of cyclosporin A on a molar basis [66]. This places mycalamides amongst the most powerful immunosuppressive compounds discovered to date. Mycalamide A has also been shown to induce apoptosis with a preference for 32 D myeloid cells that have Ras or Bcr/abl alterations [67].

The mycalamides appear to have a unique mechanism of action, which is of great interest for studying the immunobiology of T cells and potentially for developing agents that can modulate T-cell function. The strong immunosuppressive ability of these compounds and their unique mechanism of cytotoxicity makes them promising, both as potential biochemical tools (e.g., FK506 and rapamycin have already led to several advances in cell biology), and as potential therapeutic agents for preventing graft-vs.-host and host-vs.-graft disease in post-transplant surgery patients. In addition, these agents have potential in alleviating patients with autoimmune disorders. It is also of potential utility that mycalamide A does not appear to be a substrate for the major drug efflux pump, P-glycoprotein (MDR1/ABCB1). Therefore, P-gp is not expected to be a limiting factor in its cytotoxicity [68].

32.6.2 Activity of Psymberin

Psymberin also known as Irciniastatin A is a naturally occurring cytotoxic agent which was independently isolated by Pettit et al. [47] from marine sponge Psammocina species and Crews et al. [46] from Ircinia ramose species in 2004. It has been recently documented that psymberin is rather produced by the symbiotic bacteria associated with the marine sponges and not by marine sponges themselves [10]. Psymberin structural features closely resemble that of other pederin family members including mycalamide A. In general, psymberin lacks the commonly present acetal-containing pederate side chain, but is identified with a dihydroisocoumarin unit that is not widely found with other members of pederin family. The activity of pysmberin on various human cancer cell lines is listed in Table 32.1. Out of the 60 cell lines tested, psymberin displayed a differential cytotoxicity profile and was more potent against colon cancer, melanoma and breast cancer cell lines. Several research groups have attempted to synthesize this fascinating marine drug owing to its complex structure, limited natural abundance and biological properties [59]. Huang et al. reported several analogues of psymberin which were constructed by modifying the tetradhydropyran ring core of psymberin. All the analogues (1, 1A, 1B, 1C) were biologically tested using major human cancer cell lines to identify their IC50 values (Table 32.3). Compound 1(C11-Deoxypsymberin) was found to be most potent of all the analogues and its potency was 3 to 10 fold more compared to psymberin or its epimer [57]. Modifications of 1 further revealed high potency against the HOP62 human lung cancer cell line [57] (Fig. 32.1).

Fig. 32.1

Structural variations at the tetrahydropyran core of C11-Deoxypsymberin and its Epimers

Table 32.1

Differential sensitivities (LC50) of various cell lines to Psymberin as identified in the NCI developmental therapeutics in Vitro screening program [59]

Cell line

LC50 (M)

Cell line

LC50 (M)

Breast cancer

Colon cancer

MCF7

> 2.5 × 10−5

HCC-2998

3.76 × 10−7

HS578T

> 2.5 × 10−5

HCT-116

< 2.5 × 10−9

MDA-MB-435

< 2.5 × 10−9

HT29

> 2.5 × 10−5

NCI/ADR-RES

1.9 × 10−5

SW-620

< 2.5 × 10−5

T-47D

1.36 × 10−5

  

Melanoma

Leukemia

LOX IMVI

> 2.5 × 10−5

CCRF-CEM

> 2.5 × 10−5

MALME-3M

< 2.5 × 10−9

HL-60 (TB)

> 2.5 × 10−5

SK-MEL-2

> 2.5 × 10−5

K-562

> 2.5 × 10−5

SK-MEL-28

< 2.5 × 10−9

MOLT-4

> 2.5 × 10−5

SK-MEL-28

1.41 × 10−5

RPMI-8226

> 2.5 × 10−5

UACC-257

> 2.5 × 10−5

SR

> 2.5 × 10−5

UACC-62

< 2.5 × 10−9

  
Table 32.2

Mycalamide A, Psymberin and its analogues cytotoxicity against different human cancer cell lines [69, 70, 71]

IC 50 (nM)

Structure

PC-3

SK-MEL-5

Hela

T98G

KM 12

Mycalamide A

2.5 ± 0.2

2.87 ± 0.07

0.95 ± 0.02

Psymberin

0.98 ± 0.12

2.29 ± 0.13

0.64 ± 0.14

1.37 ± 0.06

0.45 ± 0.01

4-epi-psymberin

346.5 ± 102.8

762.8 ± 70

618.6 ± 267

186.7 ± 51.3

126.08 ± 8.6

8-epi-psymberin

200.2 ± 27.6

352.0 ± 2.1

> 1000

85.8 ± 48.4

37.1 ± 5.5

Psympederin

821.8 ± 89.1

> 1000

> 1000

> 1000

710.9 ± 35.8

c-8-epi-psympederin

255.5 ± 11.4

> 1000

> 1000

> 1000

> 1000

Table 32.3

Activity of Psymberin, C-11 Deoxypsymberin 1 and its Epimers, 1A, 1B, 1C [53]

IC 50 (nM)

Tissue type (human)

Cell line

Psymberin

1

1A R/R

1B R/S

1C S/R

epi-Psy

Normal

NHDF

0.84

0.066

n. d.

n. d.

3.8

n.d.

Kidney

ACHN

0.76

0.265

n. d.

n. d.

8.7

6800

Prostate

DU145

0.30

0.149

n. d.

n. d.

5.9

3800

Prostate

PC3

0.19

0.073

n. d.

n. d.

2.9

3100

Lung

H226

0.18

0.034

n. d.

n. d.

1.6

2400

Lung

HOP62

0.42

0.055

177

46

3.0

4600

Breast

MB231

0.27

0.142

n.d.

n.d.

5.3

4200

Gastric

MKN45

0.28

0.076

n.d.

n.d.

3.9

5200

Colon

SW620

0.82

0.160

n.d.

n.d.

6.1

4800

De Brabander et al. [69] synthesized psymberin and its analogues whose biological activity against major human cancer cell lines is listed in Table 32.2 [70]. Psymberin and its two epimers 8-epipsymebrin and 4-epipsymberin exhibited meaningful IC50 values whose values were relatively lower when compared to the two hybrids that were synthesized with a dimethoxy unit instead of dihydroisocoumarin unit. The structural variations of psymberin and its epimers when compared with the two hybrids indicate that retention of dihydroisocoumarin unit is essential for the biological activity of psymberin [70]. Furthermore, it was revealed that structural alterations of psymberin could result in decreased cellular uptake of these compounds in HeLa cells compared to psymberin [70]. After incubation of HeLa cells with 100 nM of psymberin and its epimers, the intra-cellular concentration of psymberinepimers (4-epi & 8-epi) was about 20-fold less than pysmberin and the intra-cellular concentration of psympederin was below the limit of detection [70]. The same study [70] employing forward genetic screen in C. elegans identified that ribosome was the primary target for psymberin and also demonstrated that in contrast to other pederins, psymberin does not exhibit blistering activity due to the absence of acetal group. Most recently, Pietruszka group synthesized 8-desmethoxy pysmberin, a putative biosynthetic precursor of psymberin in 25 steps whose biological activity is yet to be determined [58].

Psymberin exhibits very potent antiproliferative activity against a wide selection of human tumor cell lines including KM12 , PC3 , SK-MEL-5, and T98G with IC50 at range 0.45–2.29 nM [46]. The data pertinent to differential sensitivities of various cell lines to psymberin is summarized in Table 32.2. Crews and co-workers [46] also reported that psymberin exhibits phenomenal activity against a human colon cancer cell line HCT-116 with IC50 at range 2.5 × 10−9 M. It is interesting to note that according to the authors [46] ring A is not essential for activity, but in contrast N-acylaminal functionality is absolutely crucial for cytotoxicity .

32.7 Summary and Conclusions

The mycalamides and their congeners, which were initially isolated from various natural sources, have garnered significant attention from the scientific community in recent years. Owing to their limited supply from the natural sources, several research groups have focused on their biosynthesis and biological evaluation. The various schemes presented in this chapter highlight the selected synthetic approaches employed for preparing structurally unique motifs and their analogs. In addition, recent advancements in the synthetic approaches to these compounds have improved their total synthesis. These compounds and their derivatives have been evaluated for their biological activities and are proven to be very effective in extremely low concentrations. Potent cytotoxicity was observed when various cancer cell lines were treated with mycalamides, psymberin, and their analogs in the lower nanomolar range. Similarly, mycalamides have also demonstrated antiviral properties and T-cell-modulating potential. Hence, advances with this class of natural products exemplify the power of an interdisciplinary approach to drug discovery. The design of newly functionalized analogs, with potent anticancer, antiviral, and immunosuppressive activity, can now be realized.

While much remains to be revealed about the biological properties of psymberin, pederin, mycalamides, and analogs, it is reasonable to conclude that the novel synthetic approaches discussed here and in recent reviews [71, 72] will evolve to yield more potent and more highly-targeted compounds in the near future.

References

  1. 1.
    Abell A, Blunt J, Foulds G, Munro M (1997) Chemistry of the mycalamides: anti-viral and anti-tumour compounds from a New Zealand marine sponge. Part 6.1-3. The synthesis and testing of analogues of the C(7)–C(10) fragment. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1:1647–1654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perry NB, Blunt JW, Munro MHG, Pannell LK (1988) Mycalamide A, an anti-viral compound from a New Zealand sponge of the genus Mycale. J Am Chem Soc 110:4850–4851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Perry NB, Blunt JW, Munro MHG, Thompson AM (1990) Anti-viral and anti-tumor agents from a New Zealand sponge, Mycale sp. 2. Structures and solution conformations of mycalamides A and B. J Org Chem 55:223–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Simpson JS, Garson MJ, Blunt JW, Munro MHG, Hooper JNA (2000) Mycalamides C and D, cytotoxic compounds from the marine sponge Stylinos n. species. J Nat Prod 63:704–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thompson AM, Blunt JW, Munro MHG, Clark BM (1994) Chemistry of the mycalamides, anti-viral and anti-tumour compounds from a marine sponge. Part 4. Reactions of mycalamide A and alkyl derivatives with basic nucleophiles. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1:1025–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thompson AM, Blunt JW, Munro MHG, Perry NB (1995) Chemistry of the mycalamides, anti-viral and anti-tumour compounds from a marine sponge. Part 5. Acid-catalysed hydrolysis and acetal exchange, double bond additions and oxidation reactions. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1:1233–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    West LM, Northcote PT, Hood KA, Miller JH, Page MJ (2000) Mycalamide D, a new cytotoxic amide from the New Zealand marine sponge Mycale species. J Nat Prod 63:707–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frank JH, Kanamitsu K (1987) Paederus, sensulato (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae): natural history and medical importance. J Med Entomol 24:155–191Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sakemi S, Ichiba T, Kohmoto S, Saucy G, Higa T (1988) Isolation and structure elucidation of onnamide A, a new bioactive metabolite of a marine sponge, Theonella sp. J Am Chem Soc 110:4851–4853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Piel J (2002) Apolyketide synthase-peptide synthetase gene cluster from an uncultured bacterial symbiont of Paederus beetles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:14002–14007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hong CY, Kishi Y (1990) Total synthesis of mycalamides A and B. J Org Chem 55:4242–4245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hong CY, Kishi Y (1991) Total synthesis of onnamide A. J Am Chem Soc 113:9693–9694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nakata T, Nagao S, Mori N, Oishi T (1985) Total synthesis of (+)-pederin. 1. Stereocontrolled synthesis of (+)-benzoylpedamide. Tetrahedron Lett 26:6461–6464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nakata T, Nagao S, Oishi T (1985) Total synthesis of (+)-pederin. 2. Stereocontrolled synthesis of (+)-benzoylselenopederic acid and total synthesis of (+)-pederin. Tetrahedron Lett 26:6465–6468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marron TG, Roush WR (1995) Diastereoselective synthesis of N-benzoyl mycalamine, the fully elaborated trioxadecalin nucleus of mycalamide. A. Control of the key N-acyl aminal stereocenter via carbamate acylation. Tetrahedron Lett 36:1581–1584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roush WR, Marron TG (1993) Toward the synthesis of mycalamides A, B and onnamide A: a highly stereoselective synthesis of the trioxadecalin ring system. Tetrahedron Lett 34:5421–5424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roush WR, Marron TG, Pfeifer LA (1997) Highly diastereoselective synthesis of pederic acid derivatives. J Org Chem 62:474–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roush WR, Pfeifer LA (2000) Total synthesis of mycalamide A and 7-epi-mycalamide A. Org Lett 2:859–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roush WR, Pfeifer LA, Marron TG (1998) Studies on the synthesis of the mycalamides: stereocontrolledsynthesis of amodel N-Glycosylpederamide via a stereoselective aldol reaction. J Org Chem 63:2064–2065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Trotter NS, Takahashi S, Nakata T (1999) Simple and efficient synthesis of (+)-methyl 7-benzoylpederate, a key intermediate toward the mycalamides. Org Lett 1:957–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Toyota M, Hirota M, Hirano H, Ihara M (2000) A stereoselective synthesis of the C-10 to C-18 (right-half) fragment of mycalamides employing Lewis acid promoted inter-molecular aldol reaction. Org Lett 2:2031–2034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Toyota M, Hirota M, Nishikawa Y, Fukumoto K, Ihara M (1998) Palladium-catalyzed intra-molecular allylicalkylation reaction in marine natural product synthesis: enantioselective synthesis of (+)-methyl pederate, a key intermediate in syntheses of mycalamides. J Org Chem 63:5895–5902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Toyota M, Ihara M (1998) Synthetic studies on biologically active natural products using palladium-promoted cyclization. J Syn Org Chem Jpn 56:818–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Toyota M, Nishikawa Y, Fukumoto K (1998) A practical synthesis of the key intermediate for theopederins—an enantioselective total synthesis of (+)-methyl pederate. Heterocycles 47:675–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kagawa N, Ihara M, Toyota M (2006) Total synthesis of (+)-mycalamide A. Org Lett 8:875–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Trost BM, Yang H, Probst GD (2003) A formal synthesis of (−)-mycalamide A. J Am Chem Soc 126:48–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sohn J-H, Waizumi N, Zhong HM, Rawal VH (2005) Total synthesis of mycalamide A. J Am Chem Soc 127:7290–7291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Adams MA, Duggan AJ, Smolanoff J, Meinwald J (1979) Total synthesis of (+)-pederamide. J Am Chem Soc 101:5364–5370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Isaac K, Kocienski P, Campbell S (1983) Synthetic approaches to pederin. A synthesis of ethyl pederate. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 1983:249–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jewett JC, Rawal VH (2007) Total synthesis of pederin. Angew Chem Int Ed 46:6502–6504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Matsuda F, Tomiyoshi N, Yanagiya M, Matsumoto T (1988) Stereocontrolled total synthesis of (+)-pederine. Tetrahedron 44:7063–7080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nakata T, Fukui H, Nakagawa T, Matsukura H (1996) Total synthesis of mycalamide A. Further synthetic study of the right half. Heterocycles 42:159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nakata T, Matsukura H, Jian D, Nagashima H (1994) Synthesis of the right half of mycalamide A. A formal total synthesis. Tetrahedron Lett 35:8229–8232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Willson TM, Kocienski P, Jarowicki K, Isaac K, Faller A, Campbell SF et al (1990) Studies related to the synthesis of (±)-pederin. Part 1. Synthesis of ethyl pederate and benzoylselenopederic acid. Tetrahedron 46:1757–1766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Willson TM, Kocienski P, Jarowicki K, Isaac K, Hitchcock PM, Faller A et al (1990) Studies related to the synthesis of pederin. Part 2. Synthesis of pederoldibenzoate and benzoylpedamide. Tetrahedron 46:1767–1782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yanagiya M, Matsuda F, Hasegawa K, Matsumoto T (1982) Total synthesis of (+)-pedamide. A new remote controlled asymmetric induction. Tetrahedron Lett 23:4039–4042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Breitfelder S (1998) Stereoselectivesynthesis of alcohols; LII: synthesis of the C-10 to C-18 part of the mycalamides. Synthesis 29:468–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hoffmann RW, Breitfelder S, Schlapbach A (1996) Model studies towards a novel fragment coupling for the synthesis of mycalamides and related natural products. Helvetica Chimica Acta 79:346–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hoffmann RW, Schlapbach A (1993) Synthesis of the trioxadecalin-part of mycalamide B. Tetrahedron Lett 34:7903–7906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kocienski P, Jarowicki K, Marczak S (1991) Pederin: the metallated dihydropyran approach. Stereoselectivereduction of N-acylimidates via rhodium-catalysed hydroboration. Synthesis 29:1191–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tsuzuki K, Watanabe T, Yanagiya M, Matsumoto T (1976) Total synthesis of dl-pederamide. Tetrahedron Lett 17:4745–4748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wan S, Wu F, Rech JC, Green ME, Balachandran R, Horne WS et al (2011) Total synthesis and biological evaluation of pederin, psymberin, and highly potent analogues. J Am Chem Soc 133:16668–16679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wu F, Green ME, Floreancig PE (2011) Total synthesis of pederin and analogues. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:1131–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Matsumoto T (1984) Remote acyclic stereo control. Chiral synthesis of (+)-pedamide. Tetrahedron 40:2337–2343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kocienski P, Raubo P, Davis JK, Boyle FT, Davies DE, Richter A (1996) A synthesis of 18-O-methyl mycalamide B. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1:1797–1808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cichewicz RH, Valeriote FA, Crews P (2004) Psymberin, a potent sponge-derived cytotoxin from psammocinia distantly related to the pederin family. Org Lett 6:1951–1954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pettit GR, Xu JP, Chapuis JC, Pettit RK, Tackett LP, Doubek DL et al (2004) Anti-neoplastic agents. 520. Isolation and structure of irciniastatins A and B from the Indo-Pacific marine sponge Irciniaramosa. J Med Chem 47:1149–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kiren S, Williams LJ (2005) Configuration of the psymberinamide side chain. Org Lett 7:2905–2908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jiang X, GarcÃa-Fortanet J, De Brabander JK (2005) Synthesis and complete stereochemical assignment of psymberin/irciniastatin A. J Am Chem Soc 127:11254–11255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jiang X, Williams N, De Brabander JK (2006) Synthesis ofpsymberin analogues: probing a functional correlation with the pederin/mycalamide family of natural products. Org Lett 9:227–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Brown LE, Landaverry YR, Davies JR, Milinkevich KA, Ast S, Carlson JS et al (2009) Progress toward the total synthesis of psymberin/irciniastatin A. J Org Chem 74:5405–5410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Byeon SR, Park H, Kim H, Hong J (2011) Stereoselectivesynthesis of 2,6-trans-tetrahydropyran via primary diamine-catalyzed oxa-conjugate addition reaction of α,β-unsaturated ketone: total synthesis of psymberin. Org Lett 13:5816–5819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Huang X, Shao N, Huryk R, Palani A, Aslanian R, Seidel-Dugan C (2009) The discovery of potent anti-tumor agent C11-deoxypsymberin/irciniastatin A: total synthesis and biology of advanced psymberin analogues. Org Lett 11:867–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lachance H, Marion O, Hall DG (2008) Synthetic studies toward the pyran core and the amide side chain of psymberin. Tetrahedron Lett 49:6061–6064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rech JC, Floreancig PE (2005) Concise and stereoselective synthesis of the N7-C25 fragment of psymberin. Org Lett 7:5175–5178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Shangguan N, Kiren S, Williams LJ (2007) A formal synthesis of psymberin. Org Lett 9:1093–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Shao N, Huang X, Palini A, Aslanian R, Buevich A, Piwinski J et al (2009) New applications of PhI(OAc)2 in synthesis: total synthesis and SAR development of potent anti-tumor natural product psymberin/irciniastatin A. Synthesis 41:2855–2872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bielitza M, Pietruszka J (2013) Synthesis of 8-desmethoxy psymberin: aputative biosynthetic intermediate towards the marine polyketidepsymberin. Chem Eur J 19:8300–8308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Bielitza M, Pietruszka J (2013) Thepsymberin story—biological properties and approaches towards total and analogue syntheses. Angew Chem Int Ed 52:10960–10985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Bielitza M, Pietruszka J (2012) An enantioselective Mukaiyama aldol reaction as the key step towards the tetrahydropyran core of psymberinvia a γ-butyrolactone intermediate. Synlett 23:1625–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Burres NS, Clement JJ (1989) Anti-tumor activity and mechanism of action of the novel marine natural products mycalamide-A and -B and onnamide. Cancer Res 49:2935–2940Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Gurel G, Blaha G, Steitz TA, Moore PB (2009) Structures of triacetyloleandomycin and mycalamide A bind to the large ribosomal subunit of Haloarcula marismortui. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:5010–5014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ogawara H, Higashi K, Uchino K, Perry NB (1991) Change of ras-transformed NRK-cells back to normal morphology by mycalamides A and B, anti-tumor agents from a marine sponge. Chem Pharm Bull 39:2152–2154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Dyshlovoy SA, Fedorov SN, Kalinovsky AI, Shubina LK, Bokemeyer C, Stonik V et al (2012) Mycalamide A shows cytotoxic properties and prevents EGF-induced neoplastic transformation through inhibition of nuclear factors. Mar Drugs 10:1212–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Richter A, Kocienski P, Raubo P, Davies DE (1997) The in vitro biological activities of synthetic 18-O-methyl mycalamide B, 10-epi-18-O-methyl mycalamide B and pederin. Anticancer Drug Des 12:217–227Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Galvin F, Freeman GJ, Razi-Wolf Z, Benacerraf B, Nadler L, Reiser H (1993) Effects of cyclosporin A, FK 506, and mycalamide A on the activation of murine CD4+ T cells by the murine B7 antigen. Eur J Immunol 23:283–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Hood KA, West LM, Northcote PT, Berridge MV, Miller JH (2001) Induction of apoptosis by the marine sponge (Mycale) metabolites, mycalamide A and pateamine. Apoptosis 6:207–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Venturi V, Davies C, Singh AJ, Matthews JH, Bellows DS, Northcote PT et al (2012) The protein synthesis inhibitors mycalamides A and E have limited susceptibility toward the drug efflux network. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 26:94–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Feng Y, Jiang X, De Brabander JK (2012) Studies toward the unique pederin family member psymberin: full structure elucidation, two alternative total syntheses, and analogues. J Am Chem Soc 134:17083–17093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Wu C-Y, Feng Y, Cardenas ER, Williams N, Floreancig PE, De Brabander JK et al (2012) Studies toward theunique pederin family member psymberin: structure-activity relationships, biochemical studies, and genetics identify the mode-of-action of psymberin. J Am Chem Soc 134:18998–19003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Witczak ZJ, Rampulla RM, Bommareddy A (2012) Mycalamides, pederin and psymberin as natural carbohydrates and potential antitumor agents: past and future perspectives. Mini Rev Med Chem 12:1520–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Mosey RA, Floreancing PE (2012) Isolation, biological activity, synthesis, and medicinal chemistry of the pederin/mycalamide family of natural products. Nat Prod Rep 29:980–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zbigniew J. Witczak
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ajay Bommareddy
    • 1
  • Adam L. VanWert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nesbitt School of PharmacyWilkes UniversityWilkes-BarreUSA

Personalised recommendations