Advertisement

The Social Media Usage and the Transformation of Political Marketing and Campaigning of the Emerging Democracy in Indonesia

Case Study of the 2012 Gubernatorial Election of the Special Region of the Capital City Jakarta
  • Nyarwi AhmadEmail author
  • Ioan-Lucian Popa
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 13)

Abstract

For nearly one decade, parties, their candidates and electorates across the world have become acquainted with the Internet and social media usage especially during campaigns and elections. Concerning this trend, scholars have investigated the proliferation of the Internet and social media usage in the political sphere. However, little attention has been directed to explore to what extent the proliferation of social media usage have transformed marketization of politics and campaigning of parties and their candidates during direct local elections in the emerging democracy of Indonesia. By using the case study method, in-depth interviews have been conducted to address the campaign volunteers, media relations’ managers, political consultants, candidates, and pollsters during the 2012 gubernatorial election in Jakarta. As concerns its contributions, this paper argues that concerning the electoral and media arenas, there has been parallelism between marketization of politics and professionalization of campaigning among parties and their candidates during this election. As a lesson learnt from the marketization and the professionalization of campaigning of Jokowidodo-Basuki Tjahaya Purnama, this paper reveals that the integrative participatory political marketing (IPPM) and the mixed-mediated and online political campaigning (MMOPC) have been successfully utilized due to strong support from voluntary campaigners of outstanding candidates that have creatively combined the axis of the complementary powers of the underground, of the air war and of the online war of marketing and campaigning. As a practical contribution, this chapter identifies the fact that there are countries that apply the candidate-centered system rather than party-centered system and have a multi party system (such as Indonesia); once partisanship to parties and their candidates has been reduced with the passing of time, there has been extensive use of the Internet and social media networks sites by candidates, by their campaign teams and by voluntary-campaigners, the IPPM and MMOPC can be used to fortify and buzz of the personal political brand of candidates in the marketing and campaigning for winning elections.

Keywords

Social media usage Transformation Political marketing and campaigning The emerging democracy of Indonesia Case study and the 2012 gubernatorial election of special region of Jakarta 

References

  1. Adi, A., & Lilleker Darren, G. (2012). Getting the message out: Social media daily activity plan. Bournemouth, UK: The Creative Enterprise Bureau, the Media School, Bournemouth University.Google Scholar
  2. Barber, B. R. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, CA: California University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, P., & Collins, N. (1994). Political marketing: Structure and process. European Journal of Marketing, 28(1), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eriyanto. (2007). Why Fauzi Bowo can be the winner (Mengapa Fauzi Bowo Menang). The Monthly Review (Kajian Bulan). The Indonesian survey cycle (Lingkaran Survey Indonesia). vol. 4. August 2007(Edisi 04-Agustus, 2007), pp. 13–31.Google Scholar
  5. Eriyanto and Sukanta. (2007). The governatorial election of Jakarta and The effectiveness of parties’ coalition (pilkada DKI Jakarta dan Efektifitas Koalisi). The Monthly Review (Kajian Bulan). The Indonesian Survey Cyrcle (Lingkaran Survey Indonesia). vol. 4. August 2007(Edisi 04-Agustus, 2007), pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  6. Gibson, R., & Römmele, A. (2001). Changing campaign communications: A party-centred theory of professionalized campaigning. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gibson, R. K., & Römmele, A. (2009). Measuring the professionalization of political campaigning. Party Politics, 15, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Granati, F. (2012). Integrated marketing communication- back to communication. London: Amazon.Co.UK, Ltd.Google Scholar
  9. Henneberg, S. C. M. (2002). Understanding political marketing. In N. J. O. Shaughnessy & S. C. M. Henneberg (Eds.), The idea of political marketing. London: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Hill, D. T. (2003). Communication for a new democracy: Indonesia’s first online elections. The Pacific Review, 16(4), 525–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hill, D., & Sen, K. (2000). The internet in Indonesia’s new democracy. In P. Ferdinand (Ed.), The internet, democracy and democratization (pp. 119–136). London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  12. Hill, D., & Sen, K. (2002). Netizens in combat: Conflict on the Internet in Indonesia. Asian Studies Review, 26(2), 165–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kliatchko, J. (2008). Revisiting the IMC construct: A revised definition and four pillars. International Journal of Advertising, 27(1), 133–160.Google Scholar
  14. Lees-Marshment, J. (2001). Political marketing and the British political party: The party just begun. Manchester: Manchester University Press. First Edition.Google Scholar
  15. Lees-Marshment, J. (2004). The political marketing revolution: Transforming the government of the UK. London: Routledge Publication.Google Scholar
  16. Lees-Marshment, J. (2008). Political marketing and British political parties. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press. Second Edition.Google Scholar
  17. Lees-Marshment, J., & Lilleker, D. G. (Eds.). (2005). Political marketing: A comparative perspective. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lileker, D.G., Jackson, N. (2010). Interactivity and branding, public political communication as a marketing tools, in eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/15074/2/LillJack_-_PSA2010.pdf. Accessed Sept 2012.Google Scholar
  19. Lileker, D.G., Jackson, N. (2010). Towards a more participatory style of election campaigning? The impact of Web 2.0 on the UK 2010 General Election, dalam http://microsites.oii.ox.ac.uk/ipp2010/system/files/IPP2010_Lilleker_Jackson_Paper_0.pdf. Accessed by Sept 2012.
  20. Lilleker, D. G., et al. (2011). Informing, engaging, mobilising or interacting: Searching for a European model of web campaigning. European Journal of Communication, 26(3), 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lim, M. (2003a) The information terrains and politics: The internet and political power in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Social and Cultural Anthropology, 73, Jakarta: University of Indonesia.Google Scholar
  22. Lim, M. (2003b). The internet, social networks and reform in Indonesia. In N. Couldry & J. Curran (Eds.), Contesting media power. Alternative media in a networked world (pp. 273–288). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  23. Lim, M. (2005) The internet and political activism in Indonesia. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, the Universiteit Twente, Nedherland.Google Scholar
  24. Maarek, P. (1995). Political marketing and communication. London: John Libbey.Google Scholar
  25. Meijer, A., Burger, N., Ebbers, W. (2008) Citizens4Citizens: Mapping participatory practices on the Internet. Paper for Politics: Web 2.0: An International Conference, New Political Communication Unit, Department of Politics and International Relations, Royal Holloway, University of London, April 17–18, 2008.Google Scholar
  26. Newman, B. I. (1994). Marketing of the president: Political marketing as campaign strategy. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communication in post-industrial societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nugroho, B., & Nugroho, A. D. (2012). Jokowi: Politic Tanpa Pencitraan (Jokowi : The Politics Without Image Making). Jakarta: PT Gramedia.Google Scholar
  29. Ormrod, R. P. (2005). A conceptual model of political market orientation. Journal of Non-Profit and Public Sector Marketing, 14(1/2), 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ormrod, R.P. (2009). Understanding political market orientation. Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Institute for Marketing and Statistics, Aarhus School of Business, University of Aarhus, Denmark. January 2009.Google Scholar
  31. Ouwersloot, H., & Duncan, T. (2008). Integrated marketing communication. London: The McGraw-Hill Companies. European Edition.Google Scholar
  32. Rice, R. E., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2006). Perspectives on internet use: Access, involvement and interaction. In L. A. Lievrow & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and social consequences of ICTS. London: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  33. Schultz, D.E. (1993). “Integrated marketing communications: maybe definition is in the point of view.” Marketing News, January 18, 1993.Google Scholar
  34. Schultz, D. E., & Schultz, H. (2004). IMC, the next generation: Five steps for delivering value and measuring financial returns. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  35. Schultz, D. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Lauterborn, R. F. (1993). Integrated marketing communications: Putting it together & making it work. Chicago: NTC Business Book.Google Scholar
  36. Stromback, J. (2009). Selective professionalisation of political campaigning: A test of the party-centred theory of professionalised campaigning in the context of the 2006 Swedish election. Political Studies, 57, 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stromback, J. (2010). A framework for comparing political market-orientation. In J. Lees-Marshment, J. Stromback, & C. Rudd (Eds.), Global political marketing. London: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  38. Tufte, T., & Mefalopulos, P. (2009). Participatory communication: A practical guide. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  39. Wring, D. J. (2005). The politics of marketing of labour party. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Laws

  1. Law No.29/2007 About the government of special region of Jakarta.Google Scholar
  2. Law No.32/2004 about the Local Government.Google Scholar
  3. The Government Regulation No.3/2005 (for amendment and substitution of the Law No.32/2004) about the Local Government.Google Scholar

List of In-Depth Interviews

  1. Ajianto Dwi Nugrono, one of the coordinator of the voluntary-campaigner communities of Jokowidodo-Basuki Tjahaya Purnama, 22 September 2012.Google Scholar
  2. Alvito Deanova Ginting, Senior Editors/Executive Producers of Political News Programme of TV ONE, 20 February 2013.Google Scholar
  3. Arman Salam, the Director of the Pollster Firm of Lingkaran Survey Indonesia (the Indonesian Circle Survey). Personal Interview, 23 February 2013.Google Scholar
  4. Bimo Nugroho, one of the Strategic Campaigner of Jokowidodo-Basuki Tjahaya Purnama, Personal Interview, 21 September 2012Google Scholar
  5. Budi, P. (2013). The head of media centre and chief media strategies of Jokowidodo-Basuki Tjahaya Purnama, 26 February, 2013.Google Scholar
  6. Pasaoran, S. (2013). Senior editors/executive producers of political news programme of Trans 7, 25 February 2013.Google Scholar
  7. Sunarto Ciptohardjono, one of the general political consultants of the Lingkaran Survey Indonesia/The Indonesian Survey Circle, 23 February 2013.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bournemouth UniversityPoole DorsetUK
  2. 2.Universitas Gadjah Mada YogyakartaYogyakartaIndonesia
  3. 3.Vasile Alecsandri University of BacăuBacăuRomania

Personalised recommendations