Advertisement

On the Web and Contemporary Social Movements

An Introduction
  • Leocadia Díaz RomeroEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 13)

Abstract

The environmental movement in the 1990s marks the beginning of a new era for civic engagement. In the aftermath of the financial crisis, revolts opposing austerity measures and cuts on social policies offer the current version of civic action. Social movements have evolved towards global action or global activism. We witness the trans-nationalization of activist networks. Using information and communication technologies as basic tools, social movements have promoted cooperation, found supporters and organized demonstrations and protests worldwide. New technologies—the Internet, mobile phones and tablets—have showed its capacity to strengthen civic society and consolidate democracy around the world. Scholars have described new forms of democracy rooted in citizen participation (deliberative democracy, associative democracy), also enhanced with online mechanisms. Civic engagement and activism have adapted to virtual societies, maximizing their organizational linkages and networking skills. They represent these emerging participatory channels and have contributed to shaping contemporary forms of political participation.

Keywords

Civic engagement Contemporary social movements Online activism Participatory democracy Virtual public sphere Hybrid media system 

References

General References

  1. Barron, S. (2003). Technoromantisme. Paris: L’ Harmattan.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, W. L. (1998). “The Uncivic culture: communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics”. Ithiel de Sola Pool Lecture, American Political Science Association, published in P.S. Political Science and Politics, 31(4), 41–61.Google Scholar
  3. Carcasson, M., & Sprain, L. (2010). Key aspects of the deliberative democracy movement. Public Sector Digest.Google Scholar
  4. Castells, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture (The rise of the network society, Vol. 1). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Castells, M. (2004). The power of identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Clough, J. (2012). Principles of cybercrime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Daulgreen, P. (2004). Cyber protest: New media. Routledge, NY: Citizens and Social Movements.Google Scholar
  8. Declaration of Principles. (2003, December 12). World Summit on the Information Society. Geneva.Google Scholar
  9. Della Porta, D., & Tarrow, S. G. (2005). Transnational protest and global activism. People, passions, and power. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  10. Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hands, J. (2010). @ is for activism: Dissent, resistance and rebellion in a digital culture. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hobsbawm, E. (1973). The age of revolution: Europe 1789–1848. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 0-349-10484-0.Google Scholar
  13. Hoppit, J. (2011). The nation, the state, and the first industrial revolution. Journal of British Studies, 50(2), 307–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Karatzogianni, A., & Kuntsman, A. (2012). Digital cultures and the politics of emotion: Feelings, affect and technological change. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karpf, D. (2012). The MoveOn effect: The unexpected transformation of American political advocacy (Oxford studies in digital politics). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lucas, R. E. (2002). Lectures on economic growth (pp. 109–110). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-01601-9.Google Scholar
  17. Macintosh, A., & Coleman, S. (2003). Promise and problems of e-democracy: Challenges of online citizen engagement. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  18. Masuda, Y. (1980). The information society as post-industrial society. Bethesda, MD: World Future Society.Google Scholar
  19. McHale, J. (2004). Communicating for change. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  20. Norden, L. (2006). The machinery of democracy: Voting system security, accessibility, usability and cost. New York, NY: The Brennan Center for Justice.Google Scholar
  21. Power, A. (2012, September 13). Is the big society the answer to neighborhood problems? The Guardian.Google Scholar
  22. Reitan, R. (2007). Global activism. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Touraine, A. (1971). The post-industrial society. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  24. Verba, S., Nie, N., & Kim, J. (1978). Participation and political equality: A seven-nation comparison. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., & Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cited References

  1. Agre, P. (2002). Real-time politics: The internet and the political process. The Information Society, 18, 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asen, R., & Brouwer, D. C. (Eds.). (2001). Counterpublics and the State. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arquilla, J., & Ronfeldt, D. (2001). The advent of Netwar (revisited). In J. Arquilla & D. Ronfeldt (Eds.), Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy (pp. 1–25). Santa Monica: RAND.Google Scholar
  4. Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2012). Forward to the past: Lessons for the future e-government from the story so far. Information Polity, 17(3–4), 211–226.Google Scholar
  5. Barnes, S. H., & Kaase, M. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, U. (2000). What is globalization? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bennett, W. L. (2003a). New media power: The internet and global activism. In N. Couldry & J. Curran (Eds.), Contesting media power. New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  9. Bennett, W. L. (2003b). News: The politics of illusion (5th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  10. Bennett, L., & Entman, R. (Eds.). (2001). Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 75–95). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Boulianne, S. (2009). Does internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buchstein, H. (1997). Bytes that bite: The internet and deliberative democracy. Constellations, 4(2), 248–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chadwick, A. (2011, August 25). The hybrid media system. European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, Reykjavik, Iceland.Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Durkheim, É. (1957). Professional ethics and civic morals. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  16. Fenton, N., & Downey, J. (2003). Counter public spheres and global modernity. http://javnost-thepublic.org/
  17. Gladwell, M. (2010) Small change. The New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com
  18. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grofman, B., Trechsel, A. H., & Franklin, M. (Eds.). (2014). The internet and democracy in global perspective. Voters, candidates, parties, and social movements. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Grossman, L. (1996). The electronic republic: Reshaping democracy in the information age. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  21. Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hirst, P. (1994). Associative democracy: New forms of economic and social governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hirst, P. (2009). Representative democracy and its limits. The Political Quaterly, 80, S199–S213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Joyce, M. (Ed.). (2010). Digital activism decoded: The new mechanics of change. New York, NY: International Debate Education Association.Google Scholar
  26. Keane, J. (2003). Global civic society? New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  28. McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy: The making of typographic man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  29. Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom. Philadelphia, PA: Perseus Books Group.Google Scholar
  30. Negroponte, N. (1996). Being digital. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  31. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide. Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Opp, K. (2009). Theories of political protest and social movements. A multidisciplinary introduction, critique, and synthesis. Florence, KY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Pickerill, J. (2003). Cyberprotest: Environmental activism on-line. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart Mob: The next social revolution. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. Snow, D. E., & Oliver, P. E. (1995). Social movements and collective behavior: Social psychological dimensions and considerations. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  36. Tarrow, S. G. (2005). The new transnational activism. Cambridge studies in contentious politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. The Pew Charitable Trusts. (2006). http://www.pewtrusts.org/
  38. Wellman, B. (2000). Changing connectivity: A future history of Y2.03 K. Sociological Research Online, 4. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/4/wellman.html

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MurciaMurciaSpain
  2. 2.Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations