Facebook Use in the 2012 USA Presidential Campaign

Obama vs. Romney
  • Porismita BorahEmail author
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 13)


Politicians and political groups have quickly realized the potential of social networking sites as campaign tools. Although scholars have begun examining the political impact of social networking sites, more research should explore the use of these sites for political purposes. The present study uses content analysis of both the 2012 Presidential candidate’s official Facebook pages to understand how politicians use social networking sites to reach out to voters. Currently, President Barack Obama’s Facebook page has 35 million users, while Mitt Romney’s has 11 million users. Employing concepts from the political campaigns literature, the study examines how each candidate used campaign tools in Facebook. The duration of the study was September 3rd (Labor Day) to November 6th, 2012 (the day of the election). The present study found that both candidates used several similar strategies in reaching out to their fans. Both the candidates’ most common purpose for the posts was to promote their candidacy. However, in case of attack and contrast posts, Romney used the strategies more frequently. Overall, Romney led a more aggressive campaign on Facebook, using negative strategies and fear appeal.


Political campaigns Facebook Barack Obama Mitt Romney Elections 2012 


  1. Dalton, R. J. (2009). The good citizen: How a younger generation is reshaping American politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  2. Facebook, (2013). Retrieved from
  3. Hong, S., & Nadler, D. (2012). Which candidates do the public discuss online in an election campaign? The use of social media by 2012 presidential candidates and its impact on candidate salience. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 455–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Johnson, J. (2012). Twitter bites and romney: Examining the rhetorical situation of the 2012 presidential election in 140 characters. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, 2(3/4), 54–64.Google Scholar
  5. Madden, M., & Zickuhr, K. (2011). 65% of online adults use social networking sites. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from
  6. McClelland, S. (2012). News analysis/blogosphere intermedia’s best of the web. Intermedia, 40(5), 16–17.Google Scholar
  7. Mejova, Y., Srinivasan, P., & Boynton, B. (2013). GOP primary season on Twitter: “Popular” political sentiment in social media. Paper presented at WSDM, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  8. Nagourney, A. (2008, November 3). The ’08 campaign: Sea change for politics as we know it. The New York Times. Retrieved March 3 from Scholar
  9. Smith, A. (2011, January 27). Social media and politics in 2010 campaign. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from
  10. Williams, C., & Gulati, G. (2013). Social networks in political campaigns: Facebook and the congressional elections of 2006 and 2008. New Media and Society, 15(1), 52–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Winslow, G. (2012, November 5). In Election Tech, the battleground goes digital networks look to more closely integrate on-air with online and mobile coverage. Broadcasting and Cable.Google Scholar
  12. Zhang, W., Johnson, T. J., Seltzer, T., & Bichard, S. L. (2010). The revolution will be networked: The influence of social networking sites on political attitudes and behavior. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Edward R. Murrow College of CommunicationWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations