Advertisement

Smart Cities: Building Platforms for Innovative Local Economic Restructuring

  • Ari-Veikko AnttiroikoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 8)

Abstract

This chapter discusses responses to severe structural problems faced by postindustrial cities in developed countries. The driving force behind this development is deindustrialization and the need to find ways for compensating the job losses in manufacturing. The research question is: how can smart platforms support innovative local economic restructuring. The chapter starts by discussing the restructuring challenge and introducing smart city as a framework for responding to such a challenge. The following section directs attention to platforms that support local policy making and governance, shedding light on the question of how platform approach contributes to the success of urban restructuring. Discussion is explorative and thus mainly theoretical, but utilizes exemplifications of local platform design. In addition, discussion is concretized by taking a closer look at one of the “innovation factories” of Tampere, the New Factory and one of its platforms, Demola, which exemplify the new trend in platform building. They highlight how platforms may help in increasing smartness in local economic restructuring.

Keywords

Smart city Community development Local economic development Local restructuring Platform New Factory Demola 

References

  1. Antikainen, M., Mäkipää, M., & Ahonen, M. (2010). Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(1), 100–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anttiroiko, A. -V. (2012). The role of new technologies in reshaping governance platforms. International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development, 4(3), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anttiroiko, A. -V., Valkama, P., & Bailey, S. J. (2013). Smart cities in the new service economy: Building platforms for smart services. AI & Society, 29(3), 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aurigi, A. (2005). Making the digital city. The early shaping of urban internet space. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society. A venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Bessonova, A. (2011). How startups are built in Tampere: Case of demola. ArcticStartup, September 01, 2011. http://www.arcticstartup.com/2011/09/01/how-startups-are-built-in-tampere-case-of-demola. Accessed 25 Jan 2014.
  7. Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cai, Q. (2011). Promoting fairness in public policy? Supportive policy for social entrepreneurship. In Fairness in Public Policy: Efficiency, Equity, and Beyond. 2011 Korean Association for Policy Studies KAPS International Conference, pp. 301–319. Seoul: The Korean Association for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  9. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?: A Proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carillo, F. J. (Ed.) (2006). Knowledge cities. Approaches, experiences, and perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  11. Castells, M. (2000). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caves, R. W. (2004). Responding to the information needs of citizens in an open society: The role of smart communities. In M. Mälkiä, A. -V. Anttiroiko, & R. Savolainen (Eds.), eTransformation in governance: New directions in government and politics (pp. 216–233). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Caves, R., & Walshok, M. (1997). Transforming regions through information technology. Developing smart counties in California. California County Magazine, November/December 1997, 29–31.Google Scholar
  14. Christopherson, S., Kitson, M., & Michie, J. (2008). Innovation, networks and knowledge exchange. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(2), 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. City of Tampere (2010). Web site of the city of Tampere. http://www.tampere.fi/tampereinfo/ajankohtaista/5pz6R2Y6i.html. Accessed 31 Dec 2013.
  16. Cohen, S. S., & Zysman, J. (1987). Manufacturing matters: The myth of the post-industrial economy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Cooke, P., De Laurentis, C., MacNeill, S., & Collinge, C. (Eds.) (2010). Platforms of innovation. Dynamics of new industrial knowledge flows. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  18. Dais, A., Nikolaidou, M., Alexopoulou, N., & Anagnostopoulous, D. (2008). Introducing a public agency networking platform towards supporting connected governance. In M.A. Wimmer, H.J. Scholl, & E. Ferro (Eds.), EGOV 2008. LNCS 5184 (pp. 375–387). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Davey, T., Deery, M., Winters, C., van der Sijde, P., Kusio, T., & Rodríguez Sedano, S. (2011). 30 good practice case studies in university-business cooperation. Part of the DG education and culture study on the cooperation between higher education institutions and public and private organisations in europe. In T. Davey, T. Baaken, M. Deery, & V. Galan-Muros. Brussels: European commission. http://ec.europa.eu/education/higher-education/doc/studies/munstercase_en.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2013.
  20. Deakin, M., & Al Waer, H. (2011). From intelligent to smart cities. Intelligent Buildings International, 3(3), 140–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dvir, R. (2006). Knowledge city, seen as a collage of human knowledge moments. In Francesco J. C. (Ed.), Knowledge cities. Approaches, experiences, and perspectives (pp. 245–272). Oxford: Butterworth-HeinemannGoogle Scholar
  22. Edwards, F. L. (2011). State and local governments prepare for climate change. The Public Manager, 40(1), 22–26.Google Scholar
  23. Eggers, W. D. (2005). Government 2.0. Using technology to improve education, cut red tape, reduce gridlock, and enhance democracy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. European Commission. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisations (RIS 3). European Union, Regional Policy, May 2012. http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=a39fd20b-9fbc-402b-be8c-b51d03450946&groupId=10157. Accessed 28 Dec 2013.
  25. Feinstein, S. (1996). The changing world economy and urban restructuring. In S. S. Fainstein & S. Campbell (Eds.) Readings in urban theory (pp. 170–186). Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Ferro, E., Loukis, E. N., Charalabidis, Y., & Osella, M. (2013). Policy making 2.0: From theory to practice. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 359–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Gawer, A. (2010). Towards a General Theory of Technological Platforms. Paper presented at the Summer Conference 2010 on “Opening Up Innovation: Strategy, Organization and Technology” at Imperial College London Business School, June 16–18, 2010. DRUID. http://www2.druid.dk/conferences/viewpaper.php?id=501981&cf=43. Accessed 28 Dec 2013.
  29. Glaeser, E. (2012). Triumph of the city: How our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  30. Goleman, D. (2006). Social Intelligence: The new science of human relationships. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  31. Goleman, D. (2009). Ecological Intelligence: How knowing the hidden impacts of what we buy can change everything. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  32. Grossman, S. A. (2010). Public-private partnerships: BID collaboration in philadelphia. The Public Manager, 39(1), 38–42.Google Scholar
  33. Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance—Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30(Suppl 1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. John, P. (2006). Local governance in Western Europe. First published 2001 (reprint). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Koliba, C., Zia, A., & Lee, B. H. Y. (2011). Governance informatics: Managing the performance of Inter-organizational governance networks. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 16(1), article 3. (http://innovation.cc/scholarly-style/koliba_governance_informaticsv16i1a3.pdf. Accessed 13 Oct 2011).
  37. Komakech, D. (2005). Achieving more intelligent cities. Municipal engineer, 158(4), 259–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Komninos, N. (2002). Intelligent cities. Innovation, knowledge systems and digital spaces. London and New York: Spon Press.Google Scholar
  39. Komninos, N. (2013). Intelligent cities: Variable geometries of spatial intelligence. Intelligent Buildings International, 3(3), 172–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kresl, P. K., & Fry, E. H. (2005). The urban response to Internationalization. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lederman, D., Olarreaga, M., & Payton, L. (2009). Export promotion agencies revisited. Policy research Working Paper, WPS5125, November 2009. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
  42. Lester, R. K. (2007). Universities, innovation, and the competitiveness of local economies: An Overview. In R. K. Lester, & M. Sotarauta (Eds.), Innovation, universities, and the competitiveness of regions (pp. 9–30) (Technology Review 214/2007). Helsinki: Tekes.Google Scholar
  43. Marshall, S., Taylor, W., & Yu, X. (Eds.) (2004). Using community informatics to transform regions. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Martinez-Torres, M. R., Diaz-Fernández, M. C., Toral, S. L., & Barrero, F. J. (2013). Identification of new added value services on intelligent transportation systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(3), 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Matikainen, J. (2012). Uusi tehdas/New Factory. Yhteenveto 2012 (Summary 2012). Uusi Tehdas/Hermia Oy. http://www.avointampere.fi/site/assets/files/1002/avoin_tampere_uusi_tehdas_raportti_2012_v1_1.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2013.
  46. Moore, C., & Pierre, J. (1988). Partnership or Privatisation? The political economy of local economic restructuring. Policy & Politics, 16(3), 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Neil, C., & Tykkyläinen, M. (Eds.) (1998). Local economic development: A geographical comparison of rural community restructuring. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  48. New Factory. (2013). Uusi tehdas/New factory. Web site. Tampere: New Factory Ltd., Hermia Group. http://newfactory.fi/. Accessed 28 Dec 2013.
  49. PUMA. (2010). Business improvement district (BID). July, 2010. Denver: Progressive Urban Management Associates, P.U.M.A.Google Scholar
  50. Ramaswamy, V., & Gouillart, F. (2010). The power of co-creation. Build it with them to boost growth, productivity, and profits. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  51. Salomaa, A. (n.d.). Innovation in higher education: Case demola co-creation platform for talented students, companies and universities. Demola network. http://ec.europa.eu/education/events/2013/20131118/salomaa_en.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2014.
  52. Sanderson, I. (2009). Intelligent policy making for a complex world: Pragmatism, evidence and learning. Political Studies, 57(4), 699–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Savitch, H. V., & Kantor, P. (2003). Urban strategies for a global era. A cross-national comparison. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(8), 1002–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schuler, D. (1996). New community networks. Wired for change. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  55. Sefertzi, E. (2000). Creativity. Report produced for the EC funded project INNOREGIO: dissemination of innovation and knowledge management techniques. January 2000. http://www.adi.pt/docs/innoregio_creativity-en.pdf. Accessed 11 Oct 2013.
  56. Sellers, J. M. (2002). Governing from below. Urban regions and the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Simmie, J. (Ed.) (2001). Innovative cities. London and New York: Spon Press.Google Scholar
  58. The Royal Academy of Engineering. (2012). Smart infrastructure: the future. January, 2012. London: The Royal Academy of Engineering. http://www.raeng.org.uk/news/publications/list/reports/smart_infrastructure_report_january_2012.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2014.Google Scholar
  59. Tredea. (2014). Innovaatiotehtaat (Innovation Factories). Tampere: Tampereen kaupunkiseudun elinkeino- ja kehitysyhtiö Tredea Oy. http://www.innovatetampere.fi/innovaatioymparisto/innovaatiotehtaat/. Accessed 7 Jan 2014.
  60. Tse, Y. K., Chan, T. M., & Lie, R. H. (2009). Solving complex logistics problems with multi-artificial intelligent system. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 1(1), 37–48.Google Scholar
  61. Wachhaus, T. A. (2011). Governance as a framework to support informatics. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 16(1), article 5.Google Scholar
  62. Wang, J. (2013). The economic impact of special economic zones: evidence from Chinese municipalities. Journal of Development Economics, 101(issue C), 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang, J., & Wang Y. (2011). Fairness of policy making—in perspective of knowledge utilization. In Fairness in Public Policy: Efficiency, Equity, and Beyond. 2011 Korean Association for Policy Studies KAPS International Conference, pp. 635–658. Seoul: The Korean Association for Policy Studies.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversity of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations