Human spaceflight as a matter of culture and national vision
Human space activities are the subject of critical debate and justifications in the public — much more than other fields of human action and research — as well as in the scientific community due to the great amount of money spent in a highly competitive environment for public funding of scientific research and technological development. The exceptional visibility of space flight is a factor that intensifies the questions of legitimacy and creates public pressure unlike other huge investments in large facilities and enterprises, which are developing outside the limelight of public attention.195 This situation exerts particular pressure on sound reasoning when reaching budgetary decisions for manned spaceflight beyond any short-lived credits that may be gained from single, attractive missions.
KeywordsSpace Exploration Monetary Term Space Policy Space Travel National Vision
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 196.Gethmann, Carl Friedrich. “Manned Space Travel as a Cultural Mission”. Poiesis & Praxis. International Journal of Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment 4 (2006): 239–252.Google Scholar
- 198.Another side-effect resulted from the well-known “overview effect” which became a driver for world-wide environmentalism for more the 30 years. See also Seboldt, Wolfgang et al. “A review of the long-term options for space exploration and utilisation”. ESA Bulletin 101 (2000): 31–39.Google Scholar
- 199.Knobloch, Eberhard. “Erkundung und Erforschung — Alexander von Humboldts Amerikareise”. Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment 4 (2006): 267–288.Google Scholar
- 200.Gethmann, Carl F. “Man in space: The Ethics of Space Policy”. P. Pompidou, Alain ed. Paris: UNESCO. pp. 55–56.Google Scholar
- 201.Jonas, Hans. Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp, 1979.Google Scholar
- 204.Wilholt, Torsten. “Scientific autonomy and planned research: the case of space science”. Poiesis & Praxis. International Journal of Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment 4 (2006): 253–266.Google Scholar
- 205.Schrogl, Kai-Uwe, and Nicola Rohner. “Für einen neuen Ansatz zur Begründung der Raumfahrt”. Die Zukunft der Raumfahrt. Ihr Nutzen und ihr Wert. Gethmann, Carl Friedrich, Rohner, Nicola, Schrogl, Kai-Uwe eds. Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler: Europhäische Akademie, 2007.Google Scholar