Advertisement

Simulated Ergonomics Evaluation Using Modern Multi-task Evaluation Models

  • Murray GibsonEmail author
  • Bob Sesek
Conference paper
  • 15 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1216)

Abstract

The authors present a simulation model useful for determining the degree to which ergonomic exposure metrics are impacted by operational decisions such as shift duration, working overtime, cycle time, make/model mix, and job rotation. Conventional ergonomics analysis & risk assessment approaches are incapable of rapidly assessing the impact of these types of operational decisions on resultant ergonomic exposure metrics. It is common practice to treat ergonomic exposure metrics as static/constant, when in actuality they vary in response to changes in a multitude of operational parameters. The simulation model presented extends the capabilities of modern multi-task ergonomics assessment tools to account for this variation. Modern multi-task evaluation models such as RCRA, Recommended Cumulative Recovery Allowance and Fatigue-Failure are utilized.

Keywords

Ergonomic simulation Ergonomic evaluation Multi-task evaluation RCRA Fatigue Failure 

References

  1. 1.
    Gallagher, S., Schall, M.C.: Musculoskeletal disorders as a fatigue failure process: evidence, implications and research needs. Ergonomics (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1208848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gibson, M., Potvin, J.R.: An equation to calculate the recommended cumulative rest allowance across multiple subtasks. In: Association of Canadian Ergonomists (ACE) Conference, Niagara Falls, ON, October 2016Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Potvin, J.R.: Predicting maximum acceptable efforts for repetitive tasks - an equation based on duty cycle. Hum. Factors 54(2), 175–188 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gallagher, S., Sesek, R.F., Schall Jr., M.C., Huangfu, R.: Development and validation of an easy-to-use risk assessment tool for cumulative low back loading: the Lifting Fatigue Failure Tool (LiFFT). Appl. Ergon. 63, 142–150 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gallagher, S., Schall Jr., M.C., Sesek, R.F., Huangfu, R.: An upper extremity risk assessment tool based on material fatigue failure theory: the distal upper extremity tool (DUET). Hum. Factors 60(8), 1146–1162 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Badawy, M., Schall Jr., M.C., Sesek, R.F., Gallagher, S., Davis, G.A., Fehmi Capanoglu, M.: One-handed carrying among elderly and obese individuals: a systematic review to identify research gaps. Ergonomics 61(10), 1345–1354 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1470680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tang, R., Gungor, C., Sesek, R.F., Gallagher, S., Davis, G.A., Foreman, K.B.: Prediction models for the cross-sectional areas of lower lumbar intervertebral discs and vertebral endplates. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 72, 12–34 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.03.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Saturn Ergonomics ConsultingAuburnUSA
  2. 2.Auburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations