Advertisement

Destructive Tests of an Additively Manufactured Compressor Wheel Performed at High Rotational Speeds

  • Artur AndrearczykEmail author
  • Magdalena Mieloszyk
  • Paweł Bagiński
Conference paper
  • 17 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1216)

Abstract

This article presents the destructive tests of a compressor wheel of a turbocharger. The wheel was manufactured using the MultiJet Printing technology. The article analyzes the results of the destructive tests performed on the plastic rotor wheel. A numerical strength analysis of the compressor wheel and the experimental research of material samples were previously carried out. The results of the experiment may have a significant impact on the improvement of the numerical model. The experimental research was conducted at speeds that exceeded 100,000 rpm. An ultra-fast camera, which is able to capture 1,000,000 fps, was used in the research. The method used makes it possible to perform destructive tests safely, without causing any damage to the machine. The research was conducted on five wheels that were manufactured using the selected additive manufacturing technology. The wheels required no additional balancing.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing Material jetting Compressor wheel Destructive tests High-speed machines 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the project: ‘Polymeric structures with embedded FBG sensors’ project that has received funding from the National Science Centre (NCN) under grant agreement number 2018/31/D/ST8/00463. The opinions expressed in this manuscript do not necessarily reflect those of the sponsors.

References

  1. 1.
    Kumar, L.J., Pandey, P.M., Wimpenny, D.I.: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Springer, Cham (2019)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Edgar, J., Tint, S.: Additive manufacturing technologies: 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing. Johnson Matthey Technol. Rev. 59, 193–198 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fleck, T.J., Murray, A.K., Gunduz, I.E., Son, S.F., Chiu, G.T.-C., Rhoads, J.F.: Additive manufacturing of multifunctional reactive materials. Addit. Manuf. 17, 176–182 (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Velasco-Hogan, A., Xu, J., Meyers, M.A.: Additive manufacturing as a method to design and optimize bioinspired structures. Adv. Mater. 30, 1800940 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Poologasundarampillai, G., Nommeots-Nomm, A.: Materials for 3D printing in medicine: metals, polymers, ceramics, hydrogels. In: 3D Printing in Medicine, pp. 43–71. Elsevier (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jin, G., Li, W.D., Gao, L.: An adaptive process planning approach of rapid prototyping and manufacturing. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 29, 23–38 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yap, Y.L., Wang, C., Sing, S.L., Dikshit, V., Yeong, W.Y., Wei, J.: Material jetting additive manufacturing: an experimental study using designed metrological benchmarks. Precis. Eng. 50, 275–285 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sha, Y., Jiani, L., Haoyu, C., Ritchie, R.O., Jun, X.: Design and strengthening mechanisms in hierarchical architected materials processed using additive manufacturing. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 149, 150–163 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mofidian, S.M., Bardaweel, H.: A dual-purpose vibration isolator energy harvester: experiment and model. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 118, 360–376 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dizon, J.R.C., Espera Jr., A.H., Chen, Q., Advincula, R.C.: Mechanical characterization of 3D printed polymers. Addit. Manuf. 20, 44–67 (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haxo Jr., H.E., Kamp, L.C.: Destructive testing of geomembrane seams: shear and peel testing of seam strength. Geotext. Geomembr. 9(4–6), 369–395 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vendan, S.A., Manoharan, S., Buvanashekaran, G., Nagamani, C.: Strength assessment using destructive testing on MIAB welded alloy steel tubes and subsequent techno-economical evaluation. J. Manuf. Process. 14(3), 328–335 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Calderoni, C., De Matteis, G., Giubileo, C., Mazzolani, F.M.: Experimental correlations between destructive and non-destructive tests on ancient timber elements. Eng. Struct. 32(2), 442–448 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    West, C., McTaggart, R., Letcher, T., Raynie, D., Roy, R.: Effects of gamma irradiation upon the mechanical and chemical properties of 3D-printed samples of polylactic acid. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 141(4), 10 p. (2019). Article no. 041002Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Umetani, N., Schmidt, R.: SurfCuit: surface-mounted circuits on 3D prints. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 37(3), 52–60 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Faustini, M.C., Neptune, R.R., Crawford, R.H., Stanhope, S.J.: Manufacture of passive dynamic ankle–foot orthoses using selective laser sintering. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55(2), 784–790 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ge, R., Ghadiri, M., Bonakdar, T., Hapgood, K.: 3D printed agglomerates for granule breakage tests. Powder Technol. 306, 103–112 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pandolfo, B.: From prototype to production: using plastic 3D printed parts in furniture. In: 14th International Design Conference DS 84: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2016, pp. 2167–2174 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Penny, R.W., Hart, A.J.: Precision assembly of additively manufactured components using integral kinematic couplings. Precis. Eng. 104–115, 60 (2019)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sideridou, I., Achilias, D.S., Kyrikou, E.: Thermal expansion characteristics of light-cured dental resins and resin composites. Biomaterials 25, 3087–3097 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Andrearczyk, A., Zywica, G.: A concept of a test stand for the investigation of 3D printed turbochargers and selected fluid-flow machinery. Trans. Inst. Fluid-Flow Mach. 133, 3–11 (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Andrearczyk, A.: The application of a photopolymer material for the manufacture of machine elements using rapid prototyping techniques. Logistyka 4(4), 8628–8635 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Artur Andrearczyk
    • 1
    Email author
  • Magdalena Mieloszyk
    • 1
  • Paweł Bagiński
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Fluid-Flow MachineryPolish Academy of SciencesGdanskPoland

Personalised recommendations