Advertisement

A Review of Sustainable Materials Used in Thermoplastic Extrusion and Powder Bed Melting Additive Manufacturing

  • Nicole Mervine
  • Kaitlin Brӓtt
  • Daniel SaloniEmail author
Conference paper
  • 11 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1216)

Abstract

There has been a growing interest in additive manufacturing (AM) in the past decades due to its non-traditional approach of making products. One important area in the body of knowledge of AM is focused on utilization of polymers for the manufacturing of unique and competitive components when compared to traditional manufacturing. Recently bioplastics that are more sustainable, such as polylactic acid (PLA), cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB), cellulose acetate propionate (CAP), nylon 11, and polycaprolactone (PCL) have started to gain traction as a competitor to these traditional plastics. Thus, there is a large amount of relevant publications that combine material development and characterization suitable for AM, components manufacturing based on materials developed and product characterization. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the most relevant publications that integrates past and current biopolymers development for AM, 3D printed components advantages and challenges using the developed biopolymers, and materials and product testing.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing Sustainability Biopolymers 

References

  1. 1.
    Calignano, F., Manfredi, D., Ambrosio, E.P., Biamino, S., Lombardi, M., Atzeni, E., et al.: Overview on additive manufacturing technologies. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 2017 April, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 593–612 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang, S.H., Liu, P., Mokasdar, A., Hou, L.: Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 67, 1191–1203 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Holmstrm, J., Partanen, J., Tuomi, J., Walter, M.: Rapid manufacturing in the spare parts supply chain: alternative approaches to capacity deployment. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 21, 687–697 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khajavi, S.H., Partanen, J., Holmström, J.: Additive manufacturing in the spare parts supply chain. Comput. Ind. 65, 50–63 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goodship, V., Middleton, B., Cherrington, R.: Design and Manufacture of Plastic Components for Multifunctionality Electronic Resource: Structural Composites, Injection Molding, and 3D Printing. William Andrew, Amsterdam (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yang, Y., Chen, X., Lu, N., Gao, F.: Injection Molding Process Control, Monitoring, and Optimization Electronic Resource. Hanser Publishers, Munich (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lunt, J.: Large-scale production, properties and commercial applications of polylactic acid polymers. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 59, 145–152 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Álvarez-Chávez, C.R., Edwards, S., Moure-Eraso, R., Geiser, K.: Sustainability of bio-based plastics: general comparative analysis and recommendations for improvement. J. Clean. Prod. 23, 47–56 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mülhaupt, R.: Green polymer chemistry and bio-based plastics: dreams and reality. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 214, 159–174 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saloni, D., Nicole, M.: Investigation of bioplastics for additive manufacturing. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. Springer, Cham (2019)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mathew, A.P., Oksman, K., Sain, M.: Mechanical properties of biodegradable composites from poly lactic acid (PLA) and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC). J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 97, 2014–2025 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Siracusa, V., Rocculi, P., Romani, S., Dalla Rosa, M.: Biodegradable polymers for food packaging: a review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 19, 634–643 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kulich, D.M., Gaggar, S.K., Lowry, V., Stepien, R.: Acrylonitrile–Butadiene–Styrene Polymers. Wiley Online Library (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Auras, R.: Poly (Lactic Acid). Wiley Online Library (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Casavola, C., Cazzato, A., Moramarco, V., Pappalettera, G.: Preliminary study on residual stress in FDM parts. In: Residual Stress, Thermomechanics & Infrared Imaging, Hybrid Techniques and Inverse Problems, vol. 9, pp. 91–96. Springer, Cham (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wittbrodt, B., Pearce, J.M.: The effects of PLA color on material properties of 3-D printed components. Addit. Manuf. 8, 110–116 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    ColorFabb - ColorFabb Online Store - 3D Printing Filament. https://colorfabb.com/. Accessed 2017
  18. 18.
    Pilla, S.: Handbook of Bioplastics and Biocomposites Engineering Applications. Wiley/Scrivener Publishing, Hoboken/Salem (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Laser Sintering | 3D Printing Materials | Stratasys Direct Mfg. https://www.stratasysdirect.com/technologies/direct-metal-laser-sintering. Accessed 2017
  20. 20.
    Herzog, B., Kohan, M.I., Mestemacher, S.A., Pagilagan, R.U., Redmond, K.: Polyamides, Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jiang, Y., Chen, Y., Zheng, X.: Efficient polyhydroxyalkanoates production from a waste-activated sludge alkaline fermentation liquid by activated sludge submitted to the aerobic feeding and discharge process. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 7734–7741 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Albuquerque, M., Concas, S., Bengtsson, S., Reis, M.: Mixed culture polyhydroxyalkanoates production from sugar molasses: the use of a 2-stage CSTR system for culture selection. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 7112–7122 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pereira, T.F., Oliveira, M.F., Maia, I.A., Silva, J.V.L., Costa, M.F., Thire, R.: 3D printing of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) porous structures using selective laser sintering. In: Macromolecular Symposia, vol. 319 (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peterson, G.I., Yurtoglu, M., Larsen, M.B., Craig, S.L., Ganter, M.A., Storti, D.W., et al.: Additive manufacturing of mechanochromic polycaprolactone on entry-level systems. Rapid Prototyping J. 21, 520–527 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kinstlinger, I.S., Bastian, A., Paulsen, S.J., Hwang, D.H., Ta, A.H., Yalacki, D.R., et al.: Open-source selective laser sintering (OpenSLS) of Nylon and biocompatible polycaprolactone. PLoS One 11, e0147399 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zein, I., Hutmacher, D.W., Tan, K.C., Teoh, S.H.: Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 23, 1169–1185 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tymrak, B.M., Kreiger, M., Pearce, J.M.: Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater. Des. 58, 242–246 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Le Duigou, A., Castro, M., Bevan, R., Martin, N.: 3D printing of wood fibre biocomposites: From mechanical to actuation functionality. Mater. Des. 96, 106–114 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Melocchi, A., Parietti, F., Loreti, G., Maroni, A., Gazzaniga, A., Zema, L.: 3D printing by fused deposition modeling (FDM) of a swellable/erodible capsular device for oral pulsatile release of drugs. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 30, Part B, 360–367 (2015)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Azimi, P., Zhao, D., Pouzet, C., Crain, N.E., Stephens, B.: Emissions of ultrafine particles and volatile organic compounds from commercially available desktop three-dimensional printers with multiple filaments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 1260–1268 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Deng, Y., Cao, S., Chen, A., Guo, Y.: The impact of manufacturing parameters on submicron particle emissions from a desktop 3D printer in the perspective of emission reduction. Build. Environ. 104, 311–319 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest BiomaterialsNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations