Advertisement

Integrated Learning and Assistive Systems for Manual Work in Production - Proposal for a Systematic Approach to Technology Selection and Design

  • Tina HaaseEmail author
  • Justina Radde
  • Alinde Keller
  • Dirk Berndt
  • Michael Dick
Conference paper
  • 29 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1217)

Abstract

Digital assistive systems are becoming increasingly common for production work, e.g., in the fields of assembly and maintenance [1, 2]. Experience with the use of assistive technologies in those various fields of application [3] indicates that their successful use is influenced by different parameters, e.g., the individual prerequisites of the employee, the task to be supported and organizational frameworks [4]. These parameters are to be taken into account when designing human-centered, conducive to learning and work-integrated learning and assistive systems.

Keywords

Assistive system Virtual Reality Augmented Reality Work integrated Conducive to learning Learning theory design 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This paper was written based on experience gained from the project LeARn4Assembly - Didactic and Learning-Friendly Design of VR-/AR-based Learning and Assistive Systems for Complex (De-)Assembly Activities in Production (FKZ 01PV18007A), which is funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research within the framework of the program “Digital Media in Vocational Education and Training”. This paper is a further development of the article published in the scientific journal of the GfA in 2020.

References

  1. 1.
    Funk, M., Schmidt, A.: Cognitive assistance in the workplace. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 14(3), 53–55 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kohn, V., Harborth, D.: Augmented reality-a game changing technology for manufacturing Processes? In: ECIS, p. 111 (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haase, T., Berndt, D., Herrmann, K.: Anforderungen an die lernförderliche Gestaltung arbeitsplatzintegrierter Assistenzsysteme. In: Lernen & Lehren, vol. 135, 3/2019 (2019)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Apt, W., Schubert, M., Wischmann S.: Digitale Assistenzsysteme. Perspektiven und Herausforderungen für den Einsatz in Industrie und Dienstleistungen. Institut für Innovation und Technik (iit) in der VDI/VDE Innovation und Technik GmbH, Berlin (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    EFFRA European Factories of the Future Research Association: Vision For A Manufacturing Partnership. In: Horizon Europe (2019). https://www.effra.eu/sites/default/files/190312_effra_roadmapmanufacturingppp_eversion.pdf
  6. 6.
    BMBF Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung: Zukunft der Arbeit. Innovationen für die Arbeit von morgen (2016). https://www.bmbf.de/upload_filestore/pub/Zukunft_der_Arbeit.pdf
  7. 7.
    Porter, M., Heppelmann, J.: Why every organization needs an augmented reality strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 95(6), 46–57 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dehnbostel, P.: Betriebliche Lernorte, Lernräume und Selbstlernarchitekturen in der digitalisierten Arbeitswelt. In: Magazin erwachsenenbildung.at, vol. 35/36, Wien (2019)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Niehaus, J.: Mobile Assistenzsysteme für Industrie 4.0. Gestaltungsoptionen zwischen Autonomie und Kontrolle, Düsseldorf, p. 13 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schlick, C., Bruder, R., Luczak, H.: Arbeitswissenschaft. Springer, Heidelberg (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    DIN E 6385 2004-05: Grundsätze der Ergonomie für die Gestaltung von Arbeitssystemen (ISO 6385: 2004). Deutsche Fassung EN ISO, 6385 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bloom, B.S.: Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. Syba Signs, Roselle (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ulich, E.: Arbeitspsychologie. Schaffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haase, T.: Industrie 4.0: Technologiebasierte Lern-und Assistenzsysteme für die Instandhaltung, vol. 46. wbv. (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dreyfus, H., Dreyfus, L., Stuart, E.: Künstliche Intelligenz. Von den Grenzen der Denkmaschine und dem Wert der Intuition. Reinbek bei. Rowohlt, Hamburg (1987)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tina Haase
    • 1
    Email author
  • Justina Radde
    • 2
  • Alinde Keller
    • 1
  • Dirk Berndt
    • 1
  • Michael Dick
    • 2
  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Automation IFFMagdeburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of Vocational Education and Human Resources DevelopmentOtto von Guericke University MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations