Advertisement

Improving the Usability of a Digital Neurobehavioral Assessment

  • Maria ChaparroEmail author
  • Meredith Carroll
  • Julie Hook
Conference paper
  • 22 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1217)

Abstract

The rapid advancement of technology has encouraged the transition to digital psychological assessment [1, 2, 3]. The most recent trend is the use of mobile devices for neurophysiological, clinical, and/or computerized test batteries [4]. This rate of change has led to new and unique usability challenges [5]. The current work evaluated the usability of a neurobehavioral assessment application developed by the National Institute of Health (NIH) and Northwestern University that assesses neurological and behavioral function. A usability analysis of the NIH Toolbox® application, which is capable of assessing cognition, emotion, motor, and sensation, was performed and redesign recommendations were provided. The analysis consisted of: (1) user feedback, (2) heuristic evaluations, and (3) user testing. The analyses, results and recommendations are presented and focus on: (a) Reorganization to support task flow, (b) Search optimization for transparency of options and selections, and (c) Simplicity, for ease of use.

Keywords

Mobile heuristics Mobile technology Human computer interaction Digital assessment Usability 

References

  1. 1.
    Parsons, T.D., McMahan, T., Kane, R.: Practice parameters facilitating adoption of advanced technologies for enhancing neuropsychological assessment paradigms. Clin. Neuropsychol. 32(1), 16–41 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jones, N., Moffitt, M.: Ethical guidelines for mobile app development within health and mental health fields. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pract. 47(2), 155 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson, C.L., Agarwal, R.: The digitization of healthcare: boundary risks, emotion, and consumer willingness to disclose personal health information. Inf. Syst. Res. 22(3), 469–490 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koo, B.M., Vizer, L.M.: Mobile technology for cognitive assessment of older adults: a scoping review. Innov. Aging 3(1), igy038 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yáñez Gómez, R., Cascado Caballero, D., Sevillano, J.L.: Heuristic evaluation on mobile interfaces: a new checklist. Sci. World J. (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Love, S.: Understanding Mobile Human-Computer Interaction. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Free, C., Phillips, G., Galli, L., Watson, L., Felix, L., Edwards, P., Haines, A.: The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 10(1), e1001362 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, C.K.M., Cheng, M.N., Ng, C.K.: IoT-based asset management system for healthcare-related industries. Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag. 7(Godište 2015), 7–19 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nielsen, J.: Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 152–158 (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Budd, A.: Heuristics for Modern Web Application Development. http://www.andybudd.com/archives/2007/01/heuristics_for_modern_web_application_development/
  11. 11.
    Preece, J., Sharp, H., Rogers, Y.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, 4th edn. Wiley, West Sussex (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Budiu, R., Nielsen, N.: Usability of iPad Apps and Websites, 2nd edn. Nielsen Norman Group, Fremont (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Florida Institute of TechnologyMelbourneUSA
  2. 2.Feinberg School of MedicineNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations