Advertisement

Physical Load and Preventive Measures in Metal Manufacturing Industry

  • Henrijs KalkisEmail author
  • Kristine Andza
  • Zenija Roja
Conference paper
  • 19 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1215)

Abstract

In today’s advanced work environment, workers are still exposed to ergonomic risks in the work environment and employees are exposed physically hard work that includes moving loads and frequent repetitive movements at fast pace. For the ergonomic risk analysis and workload assessment, three work operations with the high physical activity were selected: the welder’s workplace, the ironing board sorting line and the ironing board’s packing station. Subjective and objective ergonomics research methods were used. Research results show that employees in selected work operations are exposed to a fast work speed and often, monotonous movements at the sorting line and lifting heavy loads at the ironing board packaging workplace. Improvements in work processes and reduction of ergonomic risks are achieved through organizational and technical solutions that do not require significant material investment.

Keywords

Physical load Ergonomics Preventive measures Manufacturing Heart rate Blood pressure 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by the project “Ergonomic stress indicators in contemporary technological work environment and possibilities of its improvement in social-technical system “Human-Machine-Environment”, Agreement No. Nr.1.1.1.2/VIAA/3/19/546.

References

  1. 1.
    Qin, J., Liu, Y., Grosvenora, R.: A categorical framework of manufacturing for industry 4.0 and beyond. Procedia CIRP (52), 173–178 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bayraktar, O., Ataç, C.: The effects of Industry 4.0 on human resources management. Globalization, Institutions and Socio-Economic Performance Macro and Micro Perspectives, pp. 337–359. Peter Lang (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ayub, Y., Shah, Z.A.: Assessment of work related musculoskeletal disorders in manufacturing industry. J. Ergon. (2018) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    State labour inspection 2018 performance review (in Latvian). Riga (2019)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hernández, J., Castillo, J., Serratos, J., García-Alcaraz, J.: Relationship between workload and fatigue among mexican assembly operators. Int. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 3(6), 315 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lind, C.: Assessment and design of industrial manual handling to reduce physical ergonomics hazards – use and development of assessment tools. Doctoral thesis (No. 2017:7) KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Technology and Health Unit of Ergonomics (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deros, B.M., Daruis, D.D.I., Ismail, A.R., Sawal, N.A., Ghani, J.A.: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among workers’ performing manual material handling work in an automotive manufacturing company. American Journal of Applied Sciences 7(8), 1087–1092 (2015). 2010 ISSN 1546-9239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kalkis, V.: Work environment risk assessment methods (in Latvian). Riga (2008). 242 p.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Klussmann, A., Steiberg, U., Liebers, F., Gebhardt, H., Rieger, M.A.: The Key Indicator Method for Manual Handling Operations (KIM-MHO) - evaluation of a new method for the assessment of working conditions within a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 11, 272 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li, G., Buckle, P.: A practical method for the assessment of work-related musculoskeletal risks Quick Exposure Check (QEC). In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 1351–1355. SAGE Publications (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kalkis, V., Roja, Z., Kalkis, H.: Occupational health and risks at work (in Latvian). Medicinas apgads, Riga (2015). 533 p.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Michael, S., Graham, K. S., Davis, G.M.: Cardiac autonomic responses during exercise and post-exercise recovery using heart rate variability and systolic time intervals—a review. Front. Physiol. 8 (2017). Article 301Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roja, Z., Kalkis, V., Vain, A., Kalkis, H., Eglite, M.: Assessment of skeletal muscle fatigue of road maintenance workers based on heart rate monitoring and myotonometry. J. Occupat. Med. Toxicol. 1, 20 (2006). p. 9Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kalkis, H., Roja, Z.: Strategic model for ergonomics implementation in operations management. J. Ergon. 6(4) (2016) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kalkis, H.: Economic analytical methods for work-related MSD cost prediction. Procedia Manuf. 3, 4181–4188 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business, Economics and ManagementUniversity of LatviaRigaLatvia
  2. 2.Ergonomic Research CenterUniversity of LatviaRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations