Advertisement

Ergonomics Risk Assessment of Graphics Tablet Users Using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment Tool

  • Mengqian XuEmail author
Conference paper
  • 20 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1215)

Abstract

The graphics tablet has become the most used in the field of digital art and the most important hardware equipment, more and more designers are using graphics tablet for painting, which inevitably leads to musculoskeletal disorders such as sore shoulders, cervical spine pain and neck pain. The best approach is to provide good interventions, this research mainly includes three aspects: First, evaluates the ergonomic risk level of graphics tablet users using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) tool. Second, evaluates the correlation between musculoskeletal disorders and ergonomic risk level of graphics tablet users. Third, provides ergonomic intervention measures, wrong posture prevention and correct posture advice for graphics tablet users.

Keywords

Graphics tablet Musculoskeletal disorders RULA Rapid upper limb assessment 

References

  1. 1.
    Padula, R.S., Comper, M.L.C., Sparer, E.H., Dennerlein, J.T.: Job rotation designed to prevent musculoskeletal disorders and control risk in manufacturing industries: a systematic review. Appl. Ergon. 58, 386–397 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McAtamney, L., Corlett, E.N.: RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl. Ergon. 24, 91–99 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Levanon, Y., Lerman, Y., Gefen, A., Ratzon, N.Z.: Validity of the modified RULA for computer workers and reliability of one observation compared to six. Ergonomics 57, 1856–1863 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuorinka, I., Jonsson, B., Kilbom, A., Vinterberg, H., Biering-Sørensen, F., Andersson, G., Jørgensen, K.: Standardised nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl. Ergon. 18, 233–237 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Namwongsa, S., Puntumetakul, R., Neubert, M.S., Chaiklieng, S., Boucaut, R.: Ergonomic risk assessment of smartphone users using the rapid upper limb assessment (RULA) tool. PLoS ONE 13, e0203394 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tola, S., Riihimäki, H., Videman, T., Viikari-Juntura, E., Hänninen, K.: Neck and shoulder symptoms among men in machine operating, dynamic physical work and sedentary work. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 14, 299–305 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ariëns, G.A., Bongers, P.M., Hoogendoorn, W.E., Van Der Wal, G., Van Mechelen, W.: High physical and psychosocial load at work and sickness absence due to neck pain. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 28, 222–231 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoogendoorn, W.E., Bongers, P.M., De Vet, H.C., Ariëns, G.A., Van Mechelen, W., Bouter, L.M.: High physical work load and low job satisfaction increase the risk of sickness absence due to low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study. Occup. Environ. Med. 59, 323–328 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee, J.H., Seo, K.C.: The comparison of cervical repositioning errors according to smartphone addiction grades. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 26, 595–598 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.East China University of Science and TechnologyShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations