Advertisement

Ergonomic Assessment of the Lifting Tasks Performed by North Indian Workers in LPG Cylinder Distribution Supply Chain

  • Sachin Kapur
  • Mahender Singh KaswanEmail author
Conference paper
  • 19 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1215)

Abstract

Lifting is considered as the most stressful activity in manual material handling and leads to musculoskeletal disorders. The present work was performed to evaluate the lifting index and the risk of low back pain among workers involved in lifting of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) cylinder. 40 workers working in 3 modes of transportation of liquefied petroleum gas cylinders in north India were investigated with the help of the NIOSH lifting equation. The results revealed that 100% of the workers have performed under different levels of risk as their LI > 1. 22.5% were under low risk, 32.5% of workers were under medium risk and 45% of the workers were under high risk. The present work reveals that there is a need to redesign the lifting tasks by reducing the horizontal distance of lifting of cylinders and reducing the weight of the cylinder.

Keywords

Ergonomics Supply chain NIOSH Lifting index ANOVA LPG cylinder 

References

  1. 1.
    Brinham, C., Garg, A.: The role of biomechanical job evaluation in the reduction of overexertion injuries. In: 23rd Annual American Industrial Hygienists Association Conference, pp. 138–144. American Industrial Hygiene Association Press, Fairfax (1983)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chaffin, J., Page, G.: Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight lifting limits. Ergonomics 37, 663–676 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chaffin, D.B.: Primary prevention of low back pain through the application of biomechanics in manual materials handling tasks. GItal Med LavErgon 27(1), 40–50 (2005). The University of Michigan, USA, Ann Arbor 8109-2117Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dempsey, P., Fathallah, F.: Application issues and theoretical concerns regarding the 1991 NIOSH equation asymmetry multiplier. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 23, 181–191 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elfeituri, F., Taboun, S.: The effects of working in restricted workspaces on lifting Capacity. In: Lee, G. (ed.) Advances in Occupational Ergonomics and Safety, pp. 95–100. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gerri, F., Mani, L.: Work-related low back pain prim care. Primary Care: Clin. Office Pract. 27(4), 865–876 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Genaidy, A., Karwowski, W., Christensen, D., Vogiatzis, C., Deraisheh, N., Prins, A.: What is ‘heavy’? Ergonomics 41, 420–432 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hidalgo, J., Genaidy, A., Karwowski, W., Christensen, D., Huston, R., Stambough, J.: A cross-validation of the NIOSH limits for manual lifting. Ergonomics 38, 2455–2464 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hidalgo, J., Genaidy, A., Karwowski, W., Christensen, D., Huston, R., Stambough, J.: A comprehensive lifting model: beyond the NIOSH lifting equation. Ergonomics 40, 916–927 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Honsa, K., Vennettilli, M., Mott, N., Silvera, D., Niechwiej, E., Wagar, S., et al.: The efficacy of the NIOSH (1991) hand-to-container coupling factor. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Human Factors Association of Canada, pp. 158–253. Human Factors Association of Canada, Calgary (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jager, M., Luttmann, A.: A critical survey on the biomechanical criterion in the NIOSH method for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 23, 331–337 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karwowski, W.: Comments on the assumption of the multiplicity of risk factors in the draft revisions of the NIOSH lifting guide. In: Kumar, S. (ed.) Advances in Industrial Ergonomics and SAFETY IV, pp. 905–910. Taylor & Francis, London (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marras, W.S., Karwowski, W. (eds.): The Occupational Ergonomics Handbook, pp. 1063–1074. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karwowski, W., Pongpatanasuegsa, N.: Linguistic interpretation in the human categorization of load heaviness. In: Proceedings of the 11th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, pp. 425–427. Taylor & Francis, London (1991)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leskinen, T., Haijanen, J.: Torque on the low back and the weight limits recommended by NIOSH in simulated lifts. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on 3-D Analysis of Human Movement (session 4, paper no. 7). Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee, K.S., Park, H.S., Chun, K.S.: The validity of the revised NIOSH weight limit in a Korean young male population: a psychophysical approach. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 18(2–3), 181–186 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mital, A.: Maximum weight of lift acceptable to male and female industrial workers for extended work shifts. Ergonomics 27, 1115–1126 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mital, A., Ramakrishnan, A.: A comparison of literature-based design recommendations and experimental capability data for complex manual materials handling activity. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 24, 73–80 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chung, M.K., Kee, D.: Evaluation of lifting tasks frequently performed during fire brick manufacturing processes using NIOSH lifting equations. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 25(4), 423–433 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nussbaum, M., Chaffin, D., Page, G.: A biomechanical investigation of the asymmetric multiplier in the revised NIOSH lifting equation. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting, pp. 709–713. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica (1995)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Norrish, A., Cryer, P.: Work-related injury in New Zealand commercial Fishermen. Br. J. Ind. Med. 47, 726–732 (1990)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Snook, S., Ciriello, V.: The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. Ergonomics 34, 1197–1213 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kaswan, M.S., Rathi, R., Singh, M.: Just in time elements extraction and prioritization for health care unit using a decision-making approach. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 36, 1243–1263 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Waters, T., Putz-Anderson, V., et al.: Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics 36, 749–776 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringLovely Professional UniversityJalandharIndia

Personalised recommendations