Advertisement

An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing Energy Saving Behavior in the Workplace

  • Kine ReegårdEmail author
  • Asgeir Drøivoldsmo
Conference paper
  • 2 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1215)

Abstract

Buildings are estimated to account for 40% of the EU’s energy consumption. Thus, there is a growing body of research on the behaviors of building users and what influences these. While there has been substantial research on energy saving behavior in households, far less research has focused on the context of non-residential buildings. We report on a study to understand energy saving behaviors in the context of workplace, drawing on the theory of planned behavior. A hierarchical regression analysis was performed on data from employees in a Norwegian organization (N = 251). We find energy concern to be a significant predictor of energy saving behavior at work, and that this relationship is partially mediated by perceived behavioral control. In addition, routinization of energy saving behavior seem to be of great importance for engaging in such behavior also at work.

Keywords

Energy saving behavior Workplace Theory of planned behavior Human and organizational factors 

References

  1. 1.
    Bergesen, B., Groth, L.H., Langseth, B., Magnussen, I.H., Spilde, D., Toutain, J.E.W.: Energibruksrapporten 2012 – Energibruk i husholdninger. Report no. 30/2012, NVE, Oslo (2012). ISBN 978-82-410-0818-4Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    European Commission: The Energy Performance of Buildings Directive. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/buildings_performance_factsheet.pdf
  3. 3.
    Chalmers, P.: Climate change: implications for buildings. key findings from the intergovernmental panel on climate change fifth assessment report. BPIE (2014). http://bpie.eu/publication/climate-change-implications-for-buildings/
  4. 4.
    Lucon, O., et al.: Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. In: Edenhofer, O., et al. (eds.) Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Staddon, S.C., Cycil, C., Goulden, M., Leygue, C., Spence, A.: Intervening to change behavior and save energy in the workplace: a systematic review of available evidence. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 17, 30–51 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    NVE: Analyse av energibruk i yrkesbygg. Report no. 24/2016, NVE, Oslo (2016). ISBN 978-82-410-1215-0Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lopes, M.A.R., Antunes, C.H., Martins, N.: Energy behaviours as promoters of energy efficiency: a 21st century review. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 16(6), 4095–4104 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mahdavi, A., Tahmasebi, F., Kayalar, M.: Prediction of plug loads in office buildings: simplified and probabalistic methods. Energy Build. 129, 322–329 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, Q., Augenbroe, G., Kim, J.-H., Gu, L.: Meta-modeling of occupancy variables and analysis of their impact on energy outcomes of office buildings. Appl. Energy 174, 166–180 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sonta, A.J., Simmons, P.E., Jain, R.K.: Understanding building occupant activities at scale: an integrated knowledge-based data-driven approach. Adv. Eng. Inform. 37, 1–13 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, C.-F., Knight, K.: Energy at work: social psychological factors affecting energy conservation intentions within Chinese electric power companies. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 4, 23–31 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wells, V.K., Taheri, B., Gregory-Smith, D., Manika, D.: The role of generativity and attitudes on employees home and workplace water and energy saving behaviors. Tour. Manag. 56, 63–74 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zierler, R., Wehrmeyer, W., Murphy, R.: The energy efficiency behavior of individuals in large organisations: a case study of a major UK infrastructure operator. Energy Policy 104, 38–49 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tetlow, R.M., van Dronkelaar, C., Beaman, C.P., Elmualim, A.A., Couling, K.: Identifying behavioral predictors of small power electricity consumption in office buildings. Build. Environ. 92, 75–85 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50, 179–211 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Madden, T.J., Ellen, P.S., Ajzen, I.: A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 18(1), 3–9 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang, Y., Wei, Y., Zhou, G.: Promoting firm’s energy saving behavior: the role of institutional pressures, top management support and financial slack. Energy Policy 115, 230–238 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yuriev, A., Boiral, O., Francoeur, V., Paillé, P.: Overcoming barriers to pro-environmental behaviors in the workplace: a systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 182, 379–394 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Littleford, C., Ryley, T.J., Firth, S.K.: Context, control and the spillover of energy use behaviours between office and home settings. J. Environ. Psychol. 40, 157–166 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matthies, E., Kastner, I., Klesse, A., Wagner, H.-J.: High reduction potentials for energy user behaviour in public buildings: how much can psychology-based interventions achieve? J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 1, 241–255 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yun, G.Y., Kim, H., Kim, J.T.: Effects of occupancy and lighting use patterns on lighting energy consumption. Energy Build. 46, 152–158 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Frederiks, E.R., Stenner, K., Hobmann, E.V.: The socio-demographic and psychological predictors of residential energy consumption: a comprehensive review. Energies 8, 573–609 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gifford, R., Nilsson, A.: Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: a review. Int. J. Psychol. 49(3), 141–157 (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gardner, B., Abraham, C., Lally, P., de Bruijn, G.-J.: Towards parsimony in habit measurement: testing the convergent and predictive validity of an automaticity subscale of the self-report habit index. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 9, 102–114 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IFE, Institute for Energy TechnologyHaldenNorway

Personalised recommendations