Advertisement

Ergonomics in Mobile Fingerprint Recognition Systems: A User Interaction Evaluation

  • Barbara CorsettiEmail author
  • Raul Sanchez-Reillo
  • Richard M. Guest
Conference paper
  • 3 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1207)

Abstract

Fingerprint recognition represents the most installed recognition modality in modern mobile devices. Currently, there are thousands and thousands of smartphones equipped with fingerprint sensors; the type of sensor and its position on the device changes depending on the model. The fingerprints sensors are typically positioned in the home button (front side), even if sensors embedded on the backside or on the lateral side are equally common. In this paper, we research how the ergonomics of the mobile fingerprint systems influences the user experience and consequently the outcome of the identification. For this reason, we assessed the user interaction with a fingerprint recognition system installed in 3 smartphones (differentiated by the position of their fingerprint sensors). Data collected during the experiment let us analyse how the position of the sensors changes the recognition system’s performance and the user feelings while completing a biometric authentication.

Keywords

Biometrics Mobile biometrics Fingerprint recognition User interaction Ergonomics Performance Usability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by Marie Skłodowska-Curie EU Framework for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020, under the Grant Agreement No. 675087 within AMBER (enhanced Mobile BiomEtRics) project.

References

  1. 1.
    ISO/IEC 19795-1:2006: Information technology – Biometric performance testing and reporting – Part 1: Principles and framework. https://www.iso.org/standard/41447.html
  2. 2.
    Ergonomics Definizione significato—Dizionario inglese Collins. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/it/dizionario/inglese/ergonomics
  3. 3.
    Kukula, E.P., Elliott, S.J.: Implementing ergonomic principles in a biometric system: a look at the Human Biometric Sensor Interaction (HBSI). In: Proceedings - International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology, pp. 86–91 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISO 9241-11:1998: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) – Part 11: Guidance on usability. https://www.iso.org/standard/16883.html
  5. 5.
    Blanco-Gonzalo, R., Diaz-Fernandez, L., Miguel-Hurtado, O., Sanchez-Reillo, R.: Usability evaluation of biometrics in mobile environments. In: 2013 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions, HSI 2013, pp. 123–128 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blanco-Gonzalo, R., Miguel-Hurtado, O., Sanchez-Reillo, R., Gonzalez-Ramirez, A.: Usability analysis of a handwritten signature recognition system applied to mobile scenarios. In: Proceedings - International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blanco-Gonzalo, R., Sanchez-Reillo, R., Ros-Gomez, R., Fernandez-Saavedra, B.: User acceptance of planar semiconductor fingerprint sensors. In: Proceedings - International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology, vol. 2015-January, pp. 31–36 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Corsetti
    • 1
    Email author
  • Raul Sanchez-Reillo
    • 1
  • Richard M. Guest
    • 2
  1. 1.University Group for Identification TechnologiesUniversity Carlos III of MadridLeganésSpain
  2. 2.School of Engineering and Digital ArtsUniversity of Kent CanterburyCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations