Advertisement

The RENAULT Ergonomic Assessment Method V3: Comparing Results with the OCRA Checklist and the Strain Index Methods

  • Filipa CarvalhoEmail author
  • Susana Silva
  • Rui B. Melo
Conference paper
  • 1 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1207)

Abstract

Work related Musculoskeletal disorders affect millions of workers in Europe and cost employers billions of Euros. Concerned about this problematic, the Renault Group has developed methodologies to assess the risks associated with jobs that integrate repetitive tasks such as the Ergonomic Assessment Method V3 (EAM-v3). Bearing in mind that the assessment of certain jobs by the EAM-v3 does not seem to fully reflect the concerns and the complaints reported by the operators performing them, it seemed appropriate to evaluate these jobs with other methods available in the literature. The main objective of this study was to compare the EAM-v3 results with those obtained with the OCRA Checklist Index (OCRA) and the Strain Index (SI). Five workstations were selected and assessed with the three methods aforementioned. The results obtained showed that in 60% of the evaluated cases, the EAM-v3 was robust enough to reflect the concerns of the respective workers, since the results obtained were, at least, similar or even higher than those obtained by the OCRA and SI methods. In 40% of the cases, the EAM-v3 was less protective resulting in lower risk levels.

Keywords

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) Ergonomic work analysis Ergonomic Assessment Method V3 (EAM-v3) OCRA CHECKLIST index (OCRA) STRAIN Index (SI) 

References

  1. 1.
    DGS: Lesões Musculoesqueléticas Relacionadas com o Trabalho: Guia de Orientação para a Prevenção. Programa Nac. Contra as Doenças Reumáticas, 28 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nunes, I.: Ergonomic risk assessment methodologies for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a patent overview (2009).  https://doi.org/10.2174/1874764710902020121
  3. 3.
    Carnide, F., et al.: Doenças Reumáticas em Contexto Ocupacional: Fatores de Risco (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    EU-OSHA: OSH in figures: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the EU-Facts and figures. European Risk Observatory Report. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.2802/10952
  5. 5.
    Bernard, B.P., (ed.): Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. NIOSH, Cincinnati (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Renault: GE75-025R - Methode d’analyse ergonomique pour les activités répétitives - guide d’utilisation (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Occhipinti, E., Colombini, D.: The Occupational Repetitive Action (OCRA) methods: OCRA index and OCRA checklist. In: Stanton, N., et al. (eds.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods, pp. 15-1–15-13. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moore, J.S., Vos, G.A.: The strain index. In: Stanton, N., et al. (eds.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods, pp. 9-1–9-5. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    da Silva, S.M.M.: Estudo comparativo do método de Avaliação Ergonómico V3 Renault com outros métodos de avaliação do risco de LMERT. Dissertação de mestrado em Ergonomia. Faculdade de Motricidade Humana - Universidade de Lisboa (2019)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roman-Liu, D.: Comparison of concepts in easy-to-use methods for MSD risk assessment. Appl. Ergon. 45(3), 420–427 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.05.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chiasson, M.E., et al.: Comparing the results of eight methods used to evaluate risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 42(5), 478–488 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2012.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Antonucci, A.: Comparative analysis of three methods of risk assessment for repetitive movements of the upper limbs: OCRA index, ACGIH (TLV), and strain index. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 70, 9–21 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2018.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Serranheira, F., Uva, A.S.: Work-related upper limb musculoskeletal disorders (WRULMSDS) risk assessment : different tools, different results!: What Are We Measring? Med. Segur. Trab. LIV, 212, 35–44 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Filipa Carvalho
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Susana Silva
    • 2
    • 3
  • Rui B. Melo
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.CIAUD (Centro de Investigação em Arquitetura, Urbanismo e Design), Faculdade de ArquiteturaUniversidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.Laboratório de Ergonomia, Faculdade de Motricidade HumanaUniversidade de LisboaCruz QuebradaPortugal
  3. 3.RENAULT CACIA, Fábrica do Grupo RENAULTAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations