Advertisement

Occupational Hazards in a Pathological Anatomy Service

  • Filipa CarvalhoEmail author
  • Rita Martins
  • Rui B. Melo
Conference paper
  • 4 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1207)

Abstract

Based on an Ergonomic Work Analysis the objectives of this study were to assess and evaluate the working conditions of a Pathological Anatomy Service (PAS) in a Private Portuguese Hospital. Twelve workers participated in the study and six tasks were analyzed and assessed with the RULA method. The main results of this study have highlighted that the work done in this PAS entails risk factors probably responsible for the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms and the high levels of eyestrain. According to RULA results, the risk for the development of MSDs is present in almost all tasks suggesting that investigation and adjustments in the work situation are required. Considering the chemical risk assessment, several nonconformities were found in terms of labeling, storage, workplace and worker’s training. Globally, the obtained results are in accordance with those reported by other studies.

Keywords

Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) Ergonomic Work Analysis Visual fatigue Pathological Anatomy Service Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) Binocular microscopes Microtomes Embedding centers Digital pathology Chemical risk 

References

  1. 1.
    EU-OSHA: OSH in figures: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the EU-Facts and figures. European Risk Observatory Report. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ramos, D.G., et al.: Analysis of the return on preventive measures in musculoskeletal disorders through the benefit-cost ratio: A case study in a hospital. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 1–12 (2015, in Press)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Mukhtad, A.A., et al.: Ergonomic risk assessment among healthcare laboratory technicians in Benghazi medical centre. Int. J. Adv. Res. Dev. 3(3), 318–327 (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martins, R., et al.: Prevalence assessment of musculoskeletal and visual symptoms among pathological anatomy service workers. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 1012, 99–108 (2019)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carvalho, F., et al.: Ergonomic work analysis of a pathological anatomy service in a Portuguese hospital. In: Arezes, P. (ed.) Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp. 449–462. Springer, Switzerland (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    George, E.: Occupational hazard for pathologists: microscope use and musculoskeletal disorders. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 133(4), 543–548 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Navy Heath Research Center: Ergonomic Microscopes reduce the risk of musculoskeletal disorders at naval health research center’s respiratory disease laboratory. https://www.public.navy.mil/navsafecen/Documents/SuccessStories/082_Ergo_Scopes.pdf. Accessed 01 Oct 2018
  9. 9.
    Ferro, A., et al.: Percepção dos técnicos de AP face à perigosidade dos agentes químicos. mícron - Rev. técnica Anat. Patológia. 14, 28–32 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ferro, A., et al.: Avaliação do risco químico no laboratório de histopatologia nos Serviços de Anatomia Patológica. Citológica e Tanatológica. NewsLab. edição 96, 74–82 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Serranheira, F., et al.: Caderno Avulso #3 - Lesões Músculo-esqueléticas e Trabalho: Alguns métodos de Avaliação. Sociedade Portuguesa Medicina do Trabalho, Lisboa (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alcaraz-Mateos, E., Caballero-Alemán, F.: Problemas músculo-esqueléticos en patólogos españoles. Prevalencia y factores de riesgo. Rev. Espñola Patol. 48(1), 9–13 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McAtamney, L., Corlett, N.: Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA). Handbook Hum. Factors Ergon. Methods. 7-1–7-11 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Böckler, M., et al.: Chemical hazards - Guide for risk assessment in small and medium enterprises (2009). http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/bathing/srwe2chap4.pdf
  15. 15.
    Pité-Madeira, C.M.: Matriz de Quantificação do Risco Químico Profissional em Laboratório. In: Soares, C.G., et al. (eds.) Riscos Públicos e Industriais, pp. 935–950. Edições Salamandra, Lisboa (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maulik, S., et al.: Evaluation of the working posture and prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among medical laboratory technicians. J. Back Musculoskelet. Rehabil. 27(4), 453–461 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    El-Helaly, M., et al.: Reported musculoskeletal symptoms among laboratory workers, in relation to individual and work-related physical factors. Egypt. J. Occup. Med. 42(1), 79–92 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CIAUD (Centro de Investigação em Arquitetura, Urbanismo e Design), Faculdade de ArquiteturaUniversidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.Laboratório de Ergonomia, Faculdade de Motricidade HumanaUniversidade de LisboaCruz QuebradaPortugal

Personalised recommendations