Advertisement

Employees Perception of the Implementation of Information Technology Systems in the Ghanaian Public Sector

  • Mohammed-Aminu SandaEmail author
Conference paper
  • 10 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1207)

Abstract

This paper explored the consequences of employees’ perception on the digitization of financial management system in a Ghanaian public organization. Guided by the systemic-structural theory of activity, quantitative data was collected from 123 employees and analyzed morphologically to understand how employees perceived the implementation of the digitized system. The results show that while majority of employees perceived the digitization of the financial management system as useful towards improving the organization’s operational efficiency and effectiveness, a minority were skeptical. Such skepticism was cognitively translated into negative employees’ attitude towards the system’s digitization process, which negatively impacted on the successfulness of its implementation. It is concluded that the digitization of financial management systems in Ghanaian public institutions are constrained by minority employees’ skepticism, since such skepticism have cognitive implications that translates into employee’s negative perceptions of digitized systems, and which perceptions can have an impeding consequential effect on the system’s implementation process.

Keywords

Information technology system Manual work system Digitized work system Employee perception Public sector organization Ghana 

References

  1. 1.
    CAGD.: The ghana integrated financial management information system. Controller and Accountant-General Department (2019). http://cagd.gov.gh/gifmis. Accessed 10 July 2019
  2. 2.
    Walton, R.E.: Up and Running: Integrating Information Technology and the Organization. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1989)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Globerson, S., Maggart, M.J.: A conceptual model of self-service. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 11(4), 33–43 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hansen, H.R.: Conceptual framework and guidelines for the implementation of mass information systems. Inf. Manag. 28(2), 125–142 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Markus, M.L.: Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Commun. ACM 26(6), 430–444 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keen, P.G.W.: Information systems and organizational change. Report CISR-46, Center for Information Systems Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (1980)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kling, R.: Social analyses of computing: theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. ACM Comput. Surv. 12(1), 130–139 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ginzberg, M.J.: A detailed look at implementation research. Report CISR-4, Centre for Information Systems Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (1974)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haines, V.Y., Petit, A.: Conditions for successful human resource information systems. Hum. Resour. Manag. 36(2), 261–275 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu, J.-H., Wang, Y.-M.: Measuring ERP success: the ultimate users’ view. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 26(8), 882–903 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fisher, S.L., Howell, A.W.: Beyond user acceptance: an examination of employee reactions to information technology systems. Hum. Resour. Manag. 43(2–3), 243–258 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klenke, K.: Construct measurement in management information systems: a review and critique of user satisfaction and user involvement instruments. Information 30(4), 325–348 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sanda, M.A.: Dichotomy of historicity and subjective perception of complexity in individuals’ activity goal formation and decision outcomes. In: Ayaz, H., Mazur, L. (eds.) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 477, pp. 265–277. Springer, Cham (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sanda, M.A., Johansson, J., Johansson, B., Abrahamsson, L.: Using systemic structural activity approach in identifying strategies enhancing human performance in mining production drilling activity. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 15(3), 262–282 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bedny, G.Z., Karwowski, W.: A Systemic-Structural Theory of Activity: Applications to Human Performance and Work Design. Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sanda, M.A.: Learning from employee perceptions of human-work and work-organization in digitized production-drilling activity in mines. In: Nunes, I.L. (ed.) Advances in Human Factors and Systems Interaction, pp. 432–441. Springer, Cham (2019)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Ghana Business SchoolAccraGhana
  2. 2.Luleå University of TechnologyLuleåSweden

Personalised recommendations